Jump to content

Gurudwara Discrimination Against Caste


Jaipal2004
 Share

Recommended Posts

I fail to see the real benefit of commiting people to the kaur/singh post-fixes within their names if there is no advise to encourage that person to take on a Gursikh lifestyle. Without the reni beni the Singh/Kaur name is just a word added to a name. Would you consider someone like Narinder Kaur of Big Brother fame an example of a Sikh because she keeps Kaur in her name? Or the many Singhs who have the wonderful post fix in their name, yet down a bottle of whiskey every night?

wjkk wjkf

veer ji, i am NOT agree with your.... i have been to over 30-40 wedding (may be more) and every time after the wedding, the bahi sahib at gurughar gives some important lessons to the couple. have you listened to these lessons? now you tell me whos responsibility is to remember what that bhai sahib said or even what our guru ji said? none of then ever said that go and have a shot, go to pub, cut your hair, do anything and everything that a sikh must not do. BUT still we do them, dont we???

no one from any gurughar will come down your house every night and check if you have a bottle of whisky opened or not? its down you the individual to remember that wisky is not allowed in sikhism and thats what the lesson was from both bhai sahib and guru ji.

hope you get my point.

bhul chuk maaf karni.

wjkk wjkf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think everyone has gone off on a tangent. It's clear that this Gurdwara is showing a caste discrimination. Is this not contrary to what the Gurdwaras should be teaching, let's not get into the state of Gurdwaras today, in an ideal world, should we not be breaking te caste barriers down again which have risen their ugly heads once again?

I agree Anand Karaj should be for Sikhs, but it shouldn't be restricted to caste distinctions, as this is wrong, is it not?

Ask yourselves this, does caste have a place in Sikhi? That will then help Bhaji with what he is asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Bhai sahib jaipal used the word gursikh to describe themselves, a gur sikh translates into "guru da sikh" i.e. guru granth sahib ji is your guru and you are his sikhs, if this is what you believe then accept the hukam that was laid down by guru gobind singh and only accept the title of singh and kaur. You have stated that it is wrong for the gurdwara sevadar to judge you on your names rather than your deeds, changing your title is a deed and an action that shows you follow the way of the sikh gurus i.e. the khalsa panth.

Gurfateh Ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

changing your title is a deed and an action that shows you follow the way of the sikh gurus i.e. the khalsa panth.

changing a title on it's own can also be easily exploited. If people adopt Singh and Kaur as names to simply have a wedding and then carry on with their jeevans as normal, then we are not promoting anything valuable. Wouldnt it be more beneficial to get the couple to commit to pandya di sewa or participate in making langar for several weeks leading to the Anand Karaj. Or get them to sit with a Granthi and learn Jap Ji Sahib. Surely these are better actions than changing your title in deed poll.

Also, making people put Singh and Kaur in their names will only make it a middle name. Surnames will still hold precedent and you will find most people wont even use the Singh or Kaur on official documentation. All in all I am not sure any respect for the Singh/Kaur name would be promoted by pushing people to use them, the effect could be adverse.

Anyway, back to original post. I do think the Gurdwara committee have a responsiblity to encourage Sikh values within the couple, but I dont think the forced use of Singh/Kaur in the name is really going to add any value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Bhai sahib good points made, and i agree the foundations of sikhi are important such as seva simran. But i also believe keeping the sole surname as kaur or singh is the hukam of guru gobind singh which should not be taken lightly, for example i use the khalsa greeting whenever i speak to a gursikh or do sikhi vichaar, it doesnt make you a sikh or a good sikh if you use the khalsa greeting but it is good practice.

Gurfateh Ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But i also believe keeping the sole surname as kaur or singh is the hukam of guru gobind singh which should not be taken lightly

The sole hukam of Guru Gobind Singh Maharaj was that we all take Khande Da Phaul and become tyar bar tyar not just keep Singh and Kaur as names. I think promoting just an adoption of the singh/kaur as a surname will be interpretted by some as an easy option of being a sikh. Just like wearing a kara does not fastrack anyone to Sikhi, the same applies to just keeping Singh or Kaur in your name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But i also believe keeping the sole surname as kaur or singh is the hukam of guru gobind singh which should not be taken lightly

The sole hukam of Guru Gobind Singh Maharaj was that we all take Khande Da Phaul and become tyar bar tyar not just keep Singh and Kaur as names. I think promoting just an adoption of the singh/kaur as a surname will be interpretted by some as an easy option of being a sikh. Just like wearing a kara does not fastrack anyone to Sikhi, the same applies to just keeping Singh or Kaur in your name.

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Bhai Sahib ji i think you misunderstood what i meant, i didnt mean only accepting the title of singh and kaur obviously we should try to follow everything the Guru sahibs have told us, keeping surnames of singh or kaur helps us in so many ways such as hiding the filthy castes associated with them, accepting that we belong to the family of Guru Gobind Singh. The Surnames people keep have not been given to us by the Guru sahibs so why attach ourselves to them?

Gurfateh Ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the Gurdwara policy and the premi's who have posted on this topic that if you call yourself a 'Gursikh' (I think my friend should research the term Gursikh because its not to be used so loosly) but don't accept that you must atleast have Singh and Kaur in your name (aswell as living the life of a Sikh), then your lieing to yourself and others by calling yourself a Sikh.

Another point, you keep on stating that your wife is also a 'Gursikh' but on the other hand your stating she is a 'Ravidassian,' so what is she then? Is she a Sikh? Because if she is then she's not a 'Ravidassian'

Also I feel couples want an Anand Karaj (because its something they have to do), without even knowing what the Anand Karaj ceremony actually means and its significance in a Sikhs life.

Are you sure your partner is a Sikh and not a Ravidassian? And do you know what the Anand Karaj is about and who Satguru Sahib Sri Guroo Granth Sahib jee Maharaaj is to you?

If your offended then I'm sorry, but these are basic Sikh principles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another point, you keep on stating that your wife is also a 'Gursikh' but on the other hand your stating she is a 'Ravidassian,' so what is she then? Is she a Sikh? Because if she is then she's not a 'Ravidassian'

Also I feel couples want an Anand Karaj (because its something they have to do), without even knowing what the Anand Karaj ceremony actually means and its significance in a Sikhs life.

Are you sure your partner is a Sikh and not a Ravidassian? And do you know what the Anand Karaj is about and who Satguru Sahib Sri Guroo Granth Sahib jee Maharaaj is to you?

If your offended then I'm sorry, but these are basic Sikh principles

im sorry to say but i have to agree with the statement made above, we complain about being stereo-typed as castes but tat the same time we allow ourselves to be defined by them...........you cannot not be a Gursikh AND a Ravidassian............

Ive got the best soultion............u and ur partner both take Kandeh Paul da Amrit and become TRUE GURSIKHS and apply all of Guru Jee teachings to your jeevans and then there are no problems hanna? If you consider yourselves True Gursikhs, im sure the next logical step is to take amrit hanna?

Gud Luck Jio and Bhul Chuck Maafi

:s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use