Jump to content

Panjab Radio


Mahakal
 Share

Recommended Posts

Panjab Radio says it is a panthic station in accordance with Sri Akal Takht, and yet continuously and repeatedly they interview those people who are going against Sikhi with their Kala Afganaesqe views and agreeing with them. Even now they are interviewing someone who has no respect for Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Ji.

Whats to be done?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Veer Akal_Sehna, ring next week.

If beating up a person is a good thing (who apparently has a disability), then I feel sorry for you. If you are defending yourself or someone else from physical attack then I can understand, but other than such a situation we are committing a crime. If we read Guru jees maha vak we would not find it necessary to attack anyone.

nw ko bYrI nhI ibgwnw sgl sMig hm kau bin AweI ]1]

naa ko bairee nehee bigaanaa sagal sa(n)g ham ko ban aaee ||1||

|

We dont know how to sit together and respect each other and if we disagree with someone we end up attacking the person. Guru Sahib never attacked anyone for having different views, even when Guru Hargobind jees father had been made shahid he never had this anger of attacking Jehanghir (which we would have done). Where Guru Gobind Singh jee or Guru Hargobind jee was attacked by others they defended themselves.

ijQY jwie bhIAY Blw khIAY Joil AMimRqu pIjY ]

jithhai jaae beheeai bhalaa keheeai jhol a(n)mrith peejai ||

I dont know what this radio presenter had done, but we should follow the updesh of Guru maharaj.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Veer Akal_Sehna, ring next week.

If beating up a person is a good thing (who apparently has a disability), then I feel sorry for you. If you are defending yourself or someone else from physical attack then I can understand, but other than such a situation we are committing a crime. If we read Guru jees maha vak we would not find it necessary to attack anyone.

nw ko bYrI nhI ibgwnw sgl sMig hm kau bin AweI ]1]

naa ko bairee nehee bigaanaa sagal sa(n)g ham ko ban aaee ||1||

|

We dont know how to sit together and respect each other and if we disagree with someone we end up attacking the person. Guru Sahib never attacked anyone for having different views, even when Guru Hargobind jees father had been made shahid he never had this anger of attacking Jehanghir (which we would have done). Where Guru Gobind Singh jee or Guru Hargobind jee was attacked by others they defended themselves.

ijQY jwie bhIAY Blw khIAY Joil AMimRqu pIjY ]

jithhai jaae beheeai bhalaa keheeai jhol a(n)mrith peejai ||

I dont know what this radio presenter had done, but we should follow the updesh of Guru maharaj.

Why do not preach this philosophy to Darshan lal bhatra. He considers dasam granth as his enemy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Veer Akal_Sehna, ring next week.

If beating up a person is a good thing (who apparently has a disability), then I feel sorry for you. If you are defending yourself or someone else from physical attack then I can understand, but other than such a situation we are committing a crime. If we read Guru jees maha vak we would not find it necessary to attack anyone.

nw ko bYrI nhI ibgwnw sgl sMig hm kau bin AweI ]1]

naa ko bairee nehee bigaanaa sagal sa(n)g ham ko ban aaee ||1||

|

We dont know how to sit together and respect each other and if we disagree with someone we end up attacking the person. Guru Sahib never attacked anyone for having different views, even when Guru Hargobind jees father had been made shahid he never had this anger of attacking Jehanghir (which we would have done). Where Guru Gobind Singh jee or Guru Hargobind jee was attacked by others they defended themselves.

ijQY jwie bhIAY Blw khIAY Joil AMimRqu pIjY ]

jithhai jaae beheeai bhalaa keheeai jhol a(n)mrith peejai ||

I dont know what this radio presenter had done, but we should follow the updesh of Guru maharaj.

Why do not preach this philosophy to Darshan lal bhatra. He considers dasam granth as his enemy.

Veer jee Prof Darshan Singh jee said on the radio, if people want to read the dasam granth they should, Im not telling people not to read the dasam granth. however, he said he feels that there are bani in the dasam granth which cannot be Guru Gobind Singh jees bani. The main issue he said he feels is with parkash of any other granth with the Guru Granth Sahib jee, that is what he says he cannot agree with. (I dont know if you heard the discussion, but that was one of the points he made regarding the dasam granth) So I dont know where enemy comes in.

I agree with his last point (which written in the panthic Sikh rehit maryada and reinforced in the gurmatta), but disagree with the first (which is a violation of the gurmatta).

The problem is veer jee that neither you nor Prof Darshan Singh follows the Akal Takhat. Its a sad state of affairs. Just as you are picking and choosing parts of the Gurmatta, so are people like prof Darshan Singh (they qoute the part about not doing parkash of any other granth, yet still keep arguing over the contents).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ragi Darshan has just defied the latest edict of Akal Takhat Sahib dated June 6 by talking against Sri Dasam Granth. He was clearly warned not to rake up this issue, and he goes on doing the same.

Listening to him it is clear that he has no knowledge of history of Sri Dasam Granth, whatsoever. He mixes up things that make no sense.

Darshan bases all his arguments on the notion that there is challenge to the supremacy of Sri Guru Granth Sahib…Which is totally false…I am sure that a single Sevadar at Takhat Hazur Sahib has more respect for Sri Guru Granth Sahib than Darshan, Joginder Spokesman and all Kala cult put together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use