Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
guptveer1469

Peshawar Under Sikh Rule

Recommended Posts

Bijla Singh, HSD or any other Sikhs view on this is highly appreciated.

Decline Under Sikh Rule

Ranjit Singh lead the Sikh army and invaded Peshawar in 1818 after wresting it from Afghanistan - resulting in Peshawar's darkest times as a part of The Sikh Kingdom of Punjab. In the wars between to two nations, the city's population was decimated as up to half of its inhabitants were killed or expelled under the Sikh reign.[21][22] The famous mosque at Ghor Khatri which was built by Jahan Ara Begum, daughter of Emperor Shahjahan, was destroyed by the Sikhs around 1823 and replaced with a temple to Gorakhnath, which remains until the present day. [23][24]

All but one of Peshawar's grand Mughal mosques were destroyed under Sikh rule[25]. In contradiction to some Sikh sources, which continue to insist that no Sikh ever desecrated a mosque,[26] of the many Mughal mosques that existed prior to the Sikh invasion, only the Mohabbat Khan Mosque survived Sikh depredations as it was used as an execution ground. Even there, the Sikhs destroyed the crowns of the minarets which had to be rebuilt later by the British[27].

Sikh rule of the city from 1834 to 1843 was administered under an Italian general named Paolo Di Avitabile, whose reign was described as one of "gallows and gibbets".[28] British Gazetteers noted that General Avitable used the minarets of the famed Mohabbat Khan Mosque as gallows.[29][30][31] Despite claims that no Sikh desecrated a mosque,[32][33] the desecration of Peshawar's mosques by their appointed administrator is well documented.

In regards to Sikh rule in Peshawar, the British noted:

“ Of the monuments of the Muslim period, too very few have survived our own times, not because the Muslim kings were not endowed with architectural tastes and talents or that they did not construct any attractive edifices, but because everything of architectural value that existed here was destroyed by the Sikhs, especially during Avitabile’s reign as the Governor of Peshawar. The only buildings of any antiquity and historical interest are the Gor Khatri, also called Serai Jahanabad, and the Mosque of Mahabat Khan. Even these did not escape the tyrant’s hand, while the mosque was desecrated and its lofty minars were used as gallows, the Serai was converted into the residence of the governor, and the mosque of Jahan Ara Begum built inside was replaced by a temple, which still stands there.[34] ”

The Sikhs also proceeded to destroy Peshawar's own Shalimar Gardens, as well as burn a large portion of the city. They felled many trees in the city gardens for use as firewood[35]. The Sikhs also destroyed much of the Bala Hisar Fort during their reign, but rebuilt it in its current form under the governance of Hari Singh Nalwa, briefly renaming it Samir Garh[36].

Sources:

21. ^ http://faculty.ed.umuc.edu/~jmatthew/naples/blog19.htm

22. ^ http://www.pakistanpaedia.com/psr/peshawar.html

23. ^ http://jang.com.pk/thenews/jan2007-weekly/...01-2007/foo.htm

24. ^ http://www.nwfptourism.com.pk/Gor%20Gatri.html

25. ^ http://pakistaniat.com/2008/02/26/masjid-m...-khan-peshawar/

26. ^ http://www.sikh-history.com/sikhhist/warriors/nalua.html

27. ^ http://www.geocities.com/prpakistan_peshaw...uhabat_khan.htm

28. ^ http://www.thesikhencyclopedia.com/europea...tml?directory=1

29. ^ http://www.nwfpuet.edu.pk/peshawar.htm

30. ^ http://www.geocities.com/prpakistan_peshaw...uhabat_khan.htm

31. ^ http://chowk.com/articles/5763

32. ^ http://www.sikh-history.com/sikhhist/warriors/nalua.html

33. ^ http://www.lifestylepakistan.com/tourism/P...2&MqId=1442

34. ^ http://splus.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-n...ifying-Peshawar

35 ^ http://www.pakistanpaedia.com/psr/peshawar.html

36 ^ ibid

This is taken from WikiPedia. A fellow Hindu wikipedian noticed this and informed me (as i edit on wiki occasionaly) and said that he suspected biased views in this article. So now I need help to correct this article, and also portray Peshawar under Sikh rule.

Bhul Chuk Maaf,

WJKK WJKF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fateh!

Well, regarding this quote:

In regards to Sikh rule in Peshawar, the British noted:

" Of the monuments of the Muslim period, too very few have survived our own times, not because the Muslim kings were not endowed with architectural tastes and talents or that they did not construct any attractive edifices, but because everything of architectural value that existed here was destroyed by the Sikhs, especially during Avitabile's reign as the Governor of Peshawar. The only buildings of any antiquity and historical interest are the Gor Khatri, also called Serai Jahanabad, and the Mosque of Mahabat Khan. Even these did not escape the tyrant's hand, while the mosque was desecrated and its lofty minars were used as gallows, the Serai was converted into the residence of the governor, and the mosque of Jahan Ara Begum built inside was replaced by a temple, which still stands there.[34] "

Look at the source in footnote 35. The above paragraph has just been lifted from the very biased review of the book the reviewer is discussing. It says nothing about the British saying that, it is the author of the review, Syed Mohammad Tahir, who is saying it. If you read the rest of his review and you can see the bias in favour of the Moghuls.

I wouldn't be surprised if the rest of the sources are misrepresented as well.

Regards

K.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fateh!

OK, I'm going to check through each of the sources mentioned. I'll come back and edit this when time permits until I have done all of them.

Source 21. It points to an encyclopaedia of Naples. Presumably the author of the article wants us to read the bit about Abu Tabela (Avitabile). Well, this source says the following about Maharaja Ranjit Singh:

"One of the stories they tell about Singh is that despite his many conquests, he did not allow wanton destruction of life or property, and that throughout his life he never passed a sentence of death. "

Regarding Avitabile, he says:

"Avitabile quickly earned the reputation of being a bloodthirsty and ruthless enforcer of Sikh authority. Every morning, they say, Avitabile would have a few Muslims thrown to their deaths from a minaret just as a warning to the locals. He meted out absolutely gruesome "justice" as governor of Peshawar, something that no doubt helped to drive the population away from the city; the population of Peshawar was reduced by half in the years of Sikh rule. "

It's clear this is hearsay. The author mentions no historical sources to support this. Even if Avitabile was a sadist, he was a Christian not a Sikh, and to blame his excesses on Ranjit Singh is pretty silly.

Source 22. Is from pakistanpaedia, another wiki that claims that the population of Peshawar was halved, but provides no sources. So basically the proof of this assertion is that some other guy said it first.

Source 23 and 24. Both point to the same news article by the same author, who is a Pakistani politician, who makes the claim that this mosque was destroyed and replaced with the Goraknath temple, but he doesn't give any reference to historical texts to prove this. Pretty much hearsay again. Besides, why would Sikhs build a Hindu temple?

Source 25. An article blogged by a Pakistani author who says that this mosque was the only one that survived the depredations of the Sikhs. He cites no historical source, so again its hearsay. This author even points out that the legendary cruelty of Avitabile is unconfirmed, especially the legend of his using the minarets as gallows.

Source 26. A Sikh History article on Hari Singh Nalwa. It says he never destroyed any mosques. :-)

Source 27. A paragraph on the Muhabat Khan mosque by an anonymous author who says the same thing about Avitabile using the minarets as gallows. No historical source cited. But the author put this sentence in quote marks, so it must be true - right? Um, no. There is no mention of the minarets being destroyed by the Sikhs and being rebuilt by the British.

Source 28. A paragraph about Avitabile from the Sikh Encyclopedia which mentions the same rumours about Avitabile's rule of Peshawar being described as one of "gallows and gibbets". There are sources here, yay! Alas, none mention where this description originated and whether there was any truth to the rumours.

Source 29. From a page on the Engineering University of Peshawar. It is the same as one of the earlier source. There is no mention of Avitabile. Repetitious and irrelevant.

Source 30. Exactly the same as source 27. Repetition. Maybe saying it twice will make it true?

Source 31. This is an article written by a travel journalist. It mentions the same claims regarding the minarets, but it does not claim to be based on anything but the journalists knowledge of Peshawar, and of course therefore there is no historical text referenced to verify this rumour.

Source 32. Exactly the same as source 26. Repetition.

Source 33. A paragraph from a tourism guide. The actual line here that the author of this article is probably referring to is this one: "A guide told us that during the Sikh-period, the minarets were used a lot as gallows." So an old illiterate peasants words constitutes historical prrof, I guess.

The authors in his next sentence after citing these sources claims that "the desecration of Peshawar's mosques by their [the Sikh's] appointed administrator is well documented," which might be true, but this article certainly proves no such thing.

Sources 34 and 35 and 36 (which is the same as 35). These I have discussed above. The Sikhs may have destroyed the Shalimar gardens for firewood (I suppose the author would prefer the Sikhs to perish in the cold?), but these sources do not offer any evidence to support the claim. The Columbia Encyclopaedia claims that Bala Hisar fort was still being used as military headquarters in the 21st century so the claim that it was destroyed by the Sikhs is likely false. What is definite is that the authors cited source certainly doesn't substantiate his claim.

If this guy had handed in this essay at university to be marked, it would have been thrown back in his face.

Regards,

K.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks brother :D

WJKK WJKF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what you have quoted in the first post seems to me to be from a english man called olaf caroe. he was the british envoy to afghanistan during the british rule in india. he was a friend of the afghans and hated the sikhs. he wrote a book about how great the afghans were. I read this book over 15 years ago but could still remember how he said the sikhs had destroyed the afghan heritage blah blah blah and all that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wikipedia is a joke. although it is interesting but it has become boring and a lot of unstable people edit a lot there. i used to edit wiki a lot and have created a lot of mischief, which is still there, but i am not going back. i am stable now lol !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

muslim authors from the region often portray the sikh rule as a joke and a period of death and lawlessness. yet they do not take into account that pakistan is just as bad.

as for peshawar all i have to say that the article is a lie - to some extent. at first many people welcomed the sikh rule over the tribal conflicts of old. but then maharaja ranjit singh (in his infinite wisdom!) appointed an italian to rule peshawar called Avitabile. this man had served under napoleon but became a british agent when he came to the punjab. ranjit singh was always impressed with foreigners and often trusted their lies and hyperbole over his own sikh commandeers. he gave him rule of peshawar after he had done other things for the maharajah. avitabile had no respect for non-europeans or their way of life. he built or took over a palace and took many local girls and women as concubines. he used dogras and other non-sikh troops to rule with an iron fist. a sikh ruler would have known these actions would have sown unrest and dissatisfaction among the populace and made the work of the soldiers and commandeers in afghanistan harder but he did it nonetheless. the money he gained from ruling was transferred to europe as he was not interested in staying in the punjab. he offered the british ridiculous amounts of help when they went to afghanistan. god knows what else he told them. so all in all, i say it was the italians fault and had nothing to do with sikhs.

also, the british army destroyed or took over a lot of buildings they thought were sikh regimental HQs, regardless of whether they were or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's a great deed in itself to have the Gurus Roop but sadly most women decide not to. We should encourage men and women alike don't get me wrong, but girls tend to feel more insecure about the way they look in the first place.   Chup kar. 
    • I've always wondered what the first edition covered that caused so much upset in the colonialist establishment of the time?       “ONE OF THE MOST VALUABLE BOOKS EVER PUBLISHED IN CONNECTION WITH INDIAN HISTORY”: RARE FIRST EDITION OF CUNNINGHAM’S HISTORY OF THE SIKHS, 1849, HANDSOMELY BOUND (INDIA) CUNNINGHAM, Joseph Davey. A History of the Sikhs, from the Origin of the Nation to the Battles of the Sutlej. London: John Murray, 1849. Octavo, modern full brown calf, raised bands, burgundy morocco spine label.$4800. First edition, with map of Punjabi political divisions until 1803 outlined in color, color folding map of Punjabi political divisions after the treaty of 1846, and folding genealogical table of the Gooroos, handsomely bound. Cunningham joined the Bengal Engineers in 1831 and arrived in India in 1834. “In 1837 he was selected by Lord Auckland to join Colonel Claud Wade, who was then the political agent upon the Sikh frontier, as assistant, with the special duty of fortifying Firozpur, the agent’s headquarters. This appointment brought him into close connection with the Sikhs, and, as he spent the next eight years of his life in political employments in this part of India, he was able to obtain that thorough knowledge of their manners and customs which makes his History of the Sikhs one of the most valuable books ever published in connection with Indian history. In 1838 he was present at the interview between Lord Auckland and Runjeet Singh, the great Sikh chieftain; in 1839 he accompanied Colonel Wade when he forced the Khyber Pass, and he was promoted first lieutenant on 20 May in that year; in 1840 he was placed in charge of Ludhiana, under G. Russell Clerk, Colonel Wade’s successor, and as political officer accompanied Brigadier-general Shelton and his army through the Sikh territory to Peshawur on his way to Cabul, and then accompanied Colonel Wheeler and Dost Muhammad, the deposed ameer of Afghanistan, back to British territory; in 1841 he was sent on a special mission to the principality of Jammu; in 1842 he was present at the interview between Lord Ellenborough and Dost Muhammad and the Sikhs… He spent four years on [the History], and on its publication in 1849 it was received with the greatest favor by the English press, a verdict which posterity has ratified, for it is universally recognized as the one authority upon the subject. But though this history made his name as an historian, it brought him into deep disgrace with his superiors. In his last chapter he treated of the history of the first Sikh war, and in it he made use of the knowledge he had obtained while acting as political agent with the army in the field, and distinctly asserted that two of the Sikh generals, Lal Singh and Tej Singh, were bought. Both Lord Hardinge and Colonel Henry Lawrence, who had acted as political agent after the death of Major Broadfoot, asserted that there had been no private negotiations with any of the Sikh leaders; but the confidential position which Cunningham had held, and still more his disgrace which followed, are strong arguments that such negotiations did pass” (DNB). As a result of the controversy, Cunningham was stripped of his authority and ordered to go on regular regimental duty. He lost most of his income in the process and any possibility of political advancement. Indeed, the publication of The History of the Sikhs marked the end of his career. He was known primarily for revealing confidential documents and his great accomplishments were little recognized, The History of the Sikhs having been largely suppressed. Cunningham died unexpectedly in 1851. Indeed, the second edition—featuring Cunningham’s own corrections and additions—was not published until 1853, too late for Cunningham’s reputation to matter. Folding map expertly linen-backed, interior generally quite nice, binding fine. A lovely copy in fine condition.   https://www.baumanrarebooks.com/rare-books/cunningham-joseph-davey/history-of-the-sikhs/89967.aspx
    • Like a UK SGPC........ Guaranteed corruption, and our enemies will know exactly who to target for compromising our community. 
×

Important Information

Terms of Use