-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
-
It goes both ways. If you hear the Islamic narrative they also prob up Islamic invaders and rulers as benign. You should hear what they say about an invader like Muhammad Bin Qaasim who is hailed as a hero and who they claim just came to save a few Muslim women while the defender Raja Dahir is portrayed as an evil scheming, degenerate pervert. But historic Muslim sources like the Chachnama convey a different story and testify how the invading Muslim Arabs had taken thousands of Hindu Sindhi women back with them. Or look at how they view Aurangzeb. They shamelessly justify his hate and war crimes against the Hindus and Sikhs. Many even call him a Wali of Allah or a great saint much like how the Buddhists view King Ashok. He is universally respected by Sunni Muslims. He is basically the main reason why most Punjabi and Mirpuri Rajputs and Jatts are Muslims in Pakistan today. The Hindu and Muslim grand narratives are very different. The Sikh grand narrative can best be read at the starting of Bhangu's Panth Prakash. Bhangu very elaborately explains the condition of India before Guru Nanak Dev ji took avtar and then what followed and how Sikhs got raaj by Vaheguru -
see doing stuff like that is just stupid! but then again you cnt expect anything else from india. marathas were deafed by afghans but eventually without a doubt they took over india and made it into a hindu state again iv heard that captain amrinder wanted to remove sikh ithiaas from punjab txt books? -
i really liked this movie the last scene gave me goosbumps! i wanna watch ajay devgans tanhaji next
-
-
