Jump to content

Beadbi Of Taksal Is Back !


11Gurus1Jot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh,

Wikipedia had some lies posted onto it via an 'Article' posted by a non-sikh. A Singh corrected the Article a few days ago following the topic I posted below.

However, some how the lies are back on Wikipedia. Is it possible for the same Singh (or another Amritdhari) to have another go at correcting Wikipedia's current Article on Damdami Taksal?

It could be that the correct update posted by the Khalsa Singh a few days ago was reversed by Wikipedia due to the correct protocols not being followed (I can't say I know what those protocols are)

Orignal Post below...

Please note the misrepresentation on Wikipedia is not Wikipedia's fault. It's the fault of whoever posted the article to Wikipedia. Please read on....

Could anybody with a love for the taksal please look at the Wikipedia Article on Damdami Taksal. It seems to totally misrepresent the taksal saying it was not associated to, or initiated by, the Tenth Master Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib Ji Maharaaj. It refers to some conjecture put 'out there' by some individual called 'Oberoi' who almost tries to remove the taksal from history itself, by saying no Sikh work on religion, history, or society eludes to this body (he refers to the taksal as 'this body').

If there are any knowledgeable Sikhs out there who respect the taksal which Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib Ji Maharaaj entrusted to Mahan Warrior Shaheed Baba Deep Singh Ji, then please have a look at this article. Apparently it's just the 'world in general/anybody' that puts the information on Wikipedia. So if there are knowledgeable Sikhs out there, who are Techies too, then please re-write the article.

There's an article on Sikhipedia which is truthful and seems to be much much more accurate and respectful. May be the Wikipedia Article should be much closer to the Sikhipedia Article.

I'd change it myself but I just haven't got the knowledge on Sikhi like the taksali's have. So it's best a taksali changes it.

This is the disrespectful article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damdami_Taksal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Below is an email i received from a Gurmukh pyara, unfortunately he doesn't have a Sikh Sangat account and has asked me to paste his email here on his behalf.

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Singhs have made several changes to the page Damdami Taksal on wikipedia and the original writer continuously reverts it back to his original write up. He [the original writer] has reported the Singh who edited the page and has got him temporarily banned. The original writer's 'About Me' section on his wikipedia account shows his personal views on "sikh fanatics". Once the Singh is no longer banned...he intends to message the original writer. Some may think this is a little thing...but Maharaj's Taksal needs the utmost respect and the truth always needs to be shown.

Below is a snippet from the original writer's 'About Me' section

About Me

I am from a group of Sikh history scholars dedicated to accuracy in portraying Sikhism and Sikh History. I have no allegiance to any Jatha,Sants or any other sects within Sikhism; I am allied only to Orthodox Sikhism.

I believe in publishing the truth, no matter how unpalatable that may be for some sects within Sikhism.

I believe that the Alcoholism, Vegetarianism, Drug addiction, Sexism, Racism, Homophobia etc. expressed in some articles by "Sikh" fanatics undermines the Just and Fair principles of Sikhism. My aim is to work with Wikipedia and challenge biased POV to create a NPOV.

I welcome any constructive criticism or comments. What I do not welcome is meaningless diatribe from religious fanatics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that the Alcoholism, Vegetarianism, Drug addiction, Sexism, Racism, Homophobia, etc. expressed in some articles by "Sikh" fanatics undermines the Just and Fair principles of Sikhism. My aim is to work with Wikipedia and challenge biased POV to create a NPOV.

What does he mean by listing the above? Are some Sikhs endorsing such views or are they against them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh,

Into the Light (and your friend Gurmukh Pyara), and Matheen. What you say is absolutely right !!!

As you say this may seem like a little thing but obviously some anti-Sikh individual owns the account that is doing beadbi on Wikipedia of Guru Gobind Singh Ji's University/Jathabandi (and in turn doing beadbi of Guru Gobind Singh's Amritdhari Singh Mahaan Warrior Shaheed Baba Deep Singh Ji).

How can we stop this individual discrediting the Taksal? Wikipedia is the single most widely used encyclopedia in the world, and some non-Sikh has hijacked it to discredit Sikhi (the Taksal). All around the world people are going to read lies about the Taksal on Wikipedia and think the Taksal is a bad organisation.

I think we need an organised Sikh internet body or internet based SIkh Organisation to help us here.

As Matheen says, lets try and contact as many Sikhs as possible to contact Wikipedia and get them to ban the liar who currently owns the account (please read into the lights', and Matheen's, posts above).

Kaljugi - no Sikhs are endorsing any of those views. The non-sikh is just try give everybody the impression that he knows something about Sikhi. He is just listing the worst qualities he can think of generally, and attaching them to, or associating them to Sikhi. It's an old trick. He just wants to give people a false/bad view of Sikhi. (this liar is so transparent)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This 'Harjot Oberoi' seems to hold himself in high regard, lol. Read the sentence which contains his name. What an ego! :D

I agree, it's hard to believe an individual can be so wrong, and then call themselves a researcher! :lol:

However, it still hurts to See Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji's Taksal being maligned like this! :sad:

I'd change it, but sometimes if you haven't got the knowledge you can do more harm than good (I hope a taksali can save the day here!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd change it, but sometimes if you haven't got the knowledge you can do more harm than good (I hope a taksali can save the day here!)

To be honest, he seems to be afraid of saying anything definitive, as such he skirts around the issues almost as if he's scared. I don't think he has the strength of his own convictions to really make the statements he wishes to. But I agree it is confusing for someone who is unaware of the history behind the Taksal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use