Jump to content

Sikhs Been Living In Uk For About 150 Years


cool water
 Share

Recommended Posts

I been doing some research into Sikh geneology and it turns out, alot of Sikh immigrants in the early years of settling in the UK married white women. And found names such as "James Singh" and "Cathrine Kaur" living in various area's of england. Suprisingly even in posh and well off parts of london. I wonder where their descendants are now, and do they even know about their Sikh heritage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Intesting point. It's a trend common throughout those times. In California, Argentina and Caribbean islands you will find the same phenomenon with Singh names. In fact the character of Johnny Depp in Pirates of the Caribbean was based on a real pirate from the Caribbean with a Singh in his name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Intesting point. It's a trend common throughout those times. In California, Argentina and Caribbean islands you will find the same phenomenon with Singh names. In fact the character of Johnny Depp in Pirates of the Caribbean was based on a real pirate from the Caribbean with a Singh in his name.

Yeah some Sikhs settled in Mexico in 1900s, and some in carribean and south america in the 1960s. Sad thing is that mixed race kids even those who are born recently have little or no knowledge or loyality towards their Sikh heritage. I dont know if the parents are teaching them or not but it seems like, When Sikhs get married to non-sikhs its always to the disadvantage to our community, they never seem to carry on the pride in their faith and chose western hedonistic athiest destructive lifestyles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's true. The bulk of our community however came over from the 50's onwards. Many of them were serving veterans and came on the military visa scheme, alongside workers from Punjab. We then had a influx from African Sikhs, from Kenya, Uganda, Siera Leone etc. Our most recent additions have been the Sikh Afghan community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

yeah it seems he is, I wonder if he knows?

Can we get sikh channel or Sangat TV to interview him? would be fascincating.

Yeah he knows. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-518674/Routine-test-reveals-white-debt-collector-Halifax-secret-great-great-grandson-king-Sikhs.html

Many of these Sikhs who came over were royalty or members of the Royal Court back in Lahore. Therefore, when Maharaja Duleep Singh went to Britain they all went with him. When Maharaja Duleep decided to go on a tour of Europe to drum up support for an invasion of British India it's not surprising they ended up getting left behind. When he failed they probably had no choice but to just 'go native'. Any modern day descendents wouldnt care less about all this unless it meant they could claim a title for part of the old Sikh Empire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use