Jump to content

Lost The Plot Sangat Tv


AKSANTALI
 Share

Recommended Posts

My apologies if this offends anyone, but I don't understand what the big deal is? I thought the riots brought the UK sikh and muslim communities together? And, the death of those 3 men was a big part of the riots for which Sangat TV got its fame worldwide. Isn't it just responsible journalism to do follow up reporting on those events? ie. report on the funerals. I don't think Sangat Tv should simply go back to broadcasting as normal after such a significant event that was the riots. Atleast for a few weeks there should be follow up reporting, and the promotion of more unity.

And who cares if muslim channels would do the same or not. When did we start comparing ourselves to others. Maybe that is the point, nobody else would do it, but our community will continue to display to the world the results of the riots and how and brought together communities.

Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My apologies if this offends anyone, but I don't understand what the big deal is? I thought the riots brought the UK sikh and muslim communities together? And, the death of those 3 men was a big part of the riots for which Sangat TV got its fame worldwide. Isn't it just responsible journalism to do follow up reporting on those events? ie. report on the funerals. I don't think Sangat Tv should simply go back to broadcasting as normal after such a significant event that was the riots. Atleast for a few weeks there should be follow up reporting, and the promotion of more unity.

And who cares if muslim channels would do the same or not. When did we start comparing ourselves to others. Maybe that is the point, nobody else would do it, but our community will continue to display to the world the results of the riots and how and brought together communities.

Just my opinion.

Its about perception and its about the reality of the situation on the "streets". Lets not kid ourselves, the Sikh and Muslim communities have not been brought together. The unity lasted for a few hours if that. After that, everyone went their own way. I don't understand the desire to keep flogging this dead horse and prolong the cessation of hostilities. Its like a desperate kid trying to seek approval from a parent. "Oh look at me daddy, I'm a good boy. Please love me". It makes us look weak. The "world" has moved on and does not care whether Sikhs and Muslims are chums or not. I suggest we do the same too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sarabhpanjab said :

Yo why don't you ask so called india's dharmic channel "astha tv" to do the same.. considering the Sikhs are responsible for any dharam being left in india.

at the moment they deliberately only show dehdhari pakhandis, dashan dass, narakdharis - that's how hindus thank the Shaheedi of Sri guru Teg Bahadhaur ji Maharaaj. Nice to know we're highly appreciated

-------------------------------------------

Listen Sarabh I dont know what you problem is with me? I been ignoring u but now ur begining to annoy me.

Obviously its the fact that Im Hindu. Dont go leaving me ur silly messages via PM, and then not give me the chance to PM an answer back.

If you got a problem with 900,000,000 million Hindus for the events of 1984, (which incidentally many Hindus especially Hindu punjabis like deplore, and condem), and were the fault of a Congress govtm lead by rajiv Ghandi and in essence politicians have no real religion or dharma DONT take it out on me.

pS : Its pretty SAD that your crying to me about Astha tv, if YOU dont like there TV content, have the vigour to complain to them.

Personally I think their programs are pretty good on the whole and prove there is DHARMA all over India, not just in Punjab.

I dont paaji paaji with people, I talk striaght and speak as a I feel, so if you dont like my posts cause im Hindu dont comment on them and vice versa.

PS : Dont go bringing Tegh Bahadur shaeedi into it, his shaheedi just liek that of many Hindus and Sikh mahapursh was for dharma, and without needing appreciation or thanks. Dont go belittling it by using it to take a shot at me.

( I edited this post because in hindsight it wouldnt have been right to insult sarabh back, as two wrongs dont make a right, and the post below is right).

Sarabh, I understand ur anger with respect to 1984, but trust me, not 1 Hindu I know applaudes it, infact we condemn it.

PEACE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am quite taken aback by some of the closed minded attitudes by some of the people on this thread; and yet they have the cheek to complain when it is they who are victims of other peoples close mindedness.

What many of you fail to see here is that three innocent men have died as a result of the disgusting attitude of others during the recent riots. Forget the stupid use of mere labelling - they are human beings above everything else. So what if Sangat TV are broadcasting the funeral? Good for them! Sorry but some of you must have forgot the part where Sri Guru Nanak Dev Jee said there is no Hindu or Muslim and that we are all one and that God is in everyone and everything. The funeral reminds the viewer of God does it not? So what if its Islamic-orientated? God has no religion. Whether the channel was spending this time on something sikhi orientated, its still "God-focused". Besides, this programme is a one off in memory of those poor men who lost their lives. Sangat TV is not bladdy broadcasting the Adhaan every morning instead of or alongside Nitnem baania, nor is it broadcasting regular muslim programmmes - only then I could begin to understand some of your criticisms.

The channel is doing the right thing. The producers or whoever, are being decent human beings who are paying respects to those innocently killed. The last time I checked, I didn't know Sikhs only cared for or remembered the death of "their own". Also, so what if muslim channels wouldn't do the same if it was a group of Sikhs who died? The attitude of "I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine" is not only childish, but it completely opposes the concept of sevaa.

For example, take the case of langar. Just because the church, synagogue, mandir or mosque don't serve langar like the gurdwarae do - it doesn't mean we will stop feeding people who belong to such.

Even if the muslim channels never ever acknowledge the Sikhs or any personal losses within the community, remember - two wrongs don't make a right.

Keep up the good work Sangat TV.

Vaaheguroo Jee Kaa Khaalsaa Vaaheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use