Jump to content

How Successfull Are Second Generation Sikhs In England


yubacitysingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

ask the previous generation and they say sabh " KUTEE JUM GEY HEEN" and as all they do is spend spend spend the previous generations kamaeeee. they have no sense of hard work and earning

an honest living. current generation is totally lost on hard work - kirat karnee , vand shakana -- to be honest even the Current sikhiee CAMPS such as boss camps FAIL TO EDUCATE YOUTH ON HARD WORKING - HELPING PARENTS THE BASICS-- Current gerenation is just hooked up on facebook, social internetworking phones etc..leading to gang culture and that is it -- and they will flat on their face for it for being so laxed -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ask the previous generation and they say sabh " KUTEE JUM GEY HEEN" and as all they do is spend spend spend the previous generations kamaeeee. they have no sense of hard work and earning

an honest living. current generation is totally lost on hard work - kirat karnee , vand shakana -- to be honest even the Current sikhiee CAMPS such as boss camps FAIL TO EDUCATE YOUTH ON HARD WORKING - HELPING PARENTS THE BASICS-- Current gerenation is just hooked up on facebook, social internetworking phones etc..leading to gang culture and that is it -- and they will flat on their face for it for being so laxed -

It is hard enough having to convince campers about Sikhi and Amrit. Now you want them to do lessons on how to behave at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Educationally Sikhs are doing very well. Most sikh young people go on to higher education. Those that dont often continue in successful family businesses. Most Sikhs are relatively well off compared to other communities.

Politically Sikhs are weak. Not enough Sikh MPs, councillors etc therefore Sikh influence in the higher tiers of society such as government, funding, community resources etc is pretty weak. Sikhs themselves are rich but sikh institutions are poor. Gurdwaras are rich but elections, community in fighting and lack of vision means that they tend not be of any big community value other than a place where ceremonies are carried out. There are no Sikh hospitals, very few sikh schools, charity organisations etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is hard enough having to convince campers about Sikhi and Amrit. Now you want them to do lessons on how to behave at home.

mate what you normally get as campers is internet/facebook brats who haven't a clue on how to respect elders and their own parents- respect don't mean jack all to this young upcoming generation -- and that is about 70% of them ...so it wouldn'nt be a bad idea that before you teach them amirt and sikhe - you check on their respect level - do they even have an iota of respect for anything let alone sikheee. Their punjabi is only bhangra knowledge mostly and therefore the root of the problem of understanding our culture - sikhe or not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use