Jump to content

Canada to curb activities of ‘pro-Khalistan’ extremists


Azaad
 Share

Recommended Posts

ਇਹ ਵੀ ਠੀਕ ਹੈ ਸਿੰਘੋ, ਪੰਜਾਬੀ 'ਚ ਟਾਈਪ ਕਰਣ ਨਾਲ ਸ਼ਾਇਦ ਸਾਡਿਆਂ ਗੱਲਾਂ ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨੀ ਟਾਊ ਟੱਪਾ ਲੰਡੀ ਪੁਚੀ ਨੂ ਸਮਝ ਨਾ ਆਵੇ |

Eh tan hai, par google ne Punjabi nu vi computer vich paudena!

Barde chalaak ne google wale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting to read that Indian embassy officials Surinder Malik and Davinder Singh Ahluwalia were asked to leave Canada when the Canadians found out their spying network and attempts to destablise Sikh movements. The Canadians should highlight this more to the media.

Canadian youth should respectfully ask their representatives to organize a meeting where you can coolly discuss this issue and bring it out to the wider spectrum. Obviously someone who is well spoken, educated and classy like Jagmeet Singh should take the lead.

From what I hear there are a lot of 'Sikh' representatives, but are silent on this issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnny,

It's pretty evident. Had these singhs were akali nihang singhs who did jhatka and sukha, you guys be first one to jump on the bandwagon - demonize them until cows got home so stop playing victim here and try throw an guilt on me.... It's all tribalism at the end of day no one cares about khalsa ideals anymore..may i remind how fanatics have hijacked sikh dharam for their silly wars- babars killing nihangs for jhatka and sukha ring a bell?..!! nihangs killing akj babars? ring a bell..??

Go cry a emotional river to someone else man who gives two hoots..!!

I don't take either sides as i said earlier since bagri who is doing his kirtan in soltitude..i won't mentioned his name again. But i will fight fascism until death whether i have take brunt from any jatha or samparda. I don't pay allegiance to your babars nor i pay allegiance to 96 crori budda dal- santa nor i pay allegiance to ISYF or small tribals groups who are trying to hijack the panth.

I pay allegiance to Satguru gobind singh maharaj and his ideals so try guilt trip on someone else man..!!!!

ਬਰਿੰਦਰ ਸਿਆਂ, ਕਰਨ ਦਿਯਾਂ ਹੈ ਬੜੇ ਤੂੰ ਅਧਰਮੀ ਕਰਮ।

ਭਰਾਵਾਂ ਦੀ ਬਦਨਾਮੀ ਕਰਕੇ, ਲਥ ਗਈ ਹੈ ਤੇਰੀ ਸ਼ਰਮ।

ਨਾਹੀ ਹੈ ਤੂੰ ਜੂਲੀਅਨ ਉਸਾੰਜ, ਨਾਹੀ ਹੈ ਹਕੀਮ ਲੁਕਮਾਨ।

ਛਡ ਆਪਣਾ ਹੰਕਾਰ ਗਾਫਲ, ਵਿਚੋਂ ਕਡਕੇ ਖੁਦੀ ਗੁਮਾਨ।

ਕੂੜ ਕੁਬੋਲ ਬੋਲ ਕੇ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੈ ਬੜੀ ਤੂੰ ਆਪਣੀ ਮਸ਼ਹੂਰੀ।

ਅਕਲ ਦਾ ਨਮੂਨਾ ਵਿਖਾਕੇ ਮਾਰਦਾ ਏ ਟਪੂਸੀ ਵਾਂਗ ਲੰਗੂਰੀ।

ਸਿਖਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਹੀ ਬਦਨਾਮੀ ਦੇਕੇ, ਗੁਰੂ ਨੂੰ ਕੀ ਵਿਖਾਇੰਗਾ ਸ਼ਕਲ।

ਸਿਆਣਫ ਤੇਰੀ ਮਿਹੰਗੀ ਪੈਂਦੀ, ਵੇ ਸਾੰਬ ਰਖ ਆਪਣੀ ਅਕਲ।

ਸਿਖ ਹੀ ਸਿਖ ਨੂੰ ਬਦਨਾਮ ਕਰੇ, ਸਮੁਚੇ ਸਿਖਾਂ ਦੀ ਹੈ ਹਾਰ।

ਛਡ ਜ਼ਿਦ ਢੀਠਪੁਨਾ, ਅਕਲ ਰਖ ਵੇ ਵਿਚ ਸਿਖਾਂ ਦੀ ਛਾਰ।

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ਬਰਿੰਦਰ ਸਿਆਂ, ਕਰਨ ਦਿਯਾਂ ਹੈ ਬੜੇ ਤੂੰ ਅਧਰਮੀ ਕਰਮ।

ਭਰਾਵਾਂ ਦੀ ਬਦਨਾਮੀ ਕਰਕੇ, ਲਥ ਗਈ ਹੈ ਤੇਰੀ ਸ਼ਰਮ।

ਨਾਹੀ ਹੈ ਤੂੰ ਜੂਲੀਅਨ ਉਸਾੰਜ, ਨਾਹੀ ਹੈ ਹਕੀਮ ਲੁਕਮਾਨ।

ਛਡ ਆਪਣਾ ਹੰਕਾਰ ਗਾਫਲ, ਵਿਚੋਂ ਕਡਕੇ ਖੁਦੀ ਗੁਮਾਨ।

ਕੂੜ ਕੁਬੋਲ ਬੋਲ ਕੇ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੈ ਬੜੀ ਤੂੰ ਆਪਣੀ ਮਸ਼ਹੂਰੀ।

ਅਕਲ ਦਾ ਨਮੂਨਾ ਵਿਖਾਕੇ ਮਾਰਦਾ ਏ ਟਪੂਸੀ ਵਾਂਗ ਲੰਗੂਰੀ।

ਸਿਖਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਹੀ ਬਦਨਾਮੀ ਦੇਕੇ, ਗੁਰੂ ਨੂੰ ਕੀ ਵਿਖਾਇੰਗਾ ਸ਼ਕਲ।

ਸਿਆਣਫ ਤੇਰੀ ਮਿਹੰਗੀ ਪੈਂਦੀ, ਵੇ ਸਾੰਬ ਰਖ ਆਪਣੀ ਅਕਲ।

ਸਿਖ ਹੀ ਸਿਖ ਨੂੰ ਬਦਨਾਮ ਕਰੇ, ਸਮੁਚੇ ਸਿਖਾਂ ਦੀ ਹੈ ਹਾਰ।

ਛਡ ਜ਼ਿਦ ਢੀਠਪੁਨਾ, ਅਕਲ ਰਖ ਵੇ ਵਿਚ ਸਿਖਾਂ ਦੀ ਛਾਰ।

Even though your poems accuses me of doing nindya/adharmi karam or doing badnami of sikh which i never intended to... I only wish to state truth nothing but truth how painful it might be for everyone to fathom as guru never hide the wrong doings of sikh to avoid further consequences or negative press ..for satguru gobind singh maharaj its all sam dristhi..its same dristh/rules for all humanity.

Despite of all accusations against me and despite of all that, i really like your poem style..!! its lovely man where did you learn it?..let me guess ? soraj parkash??.!! :D :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I must say, I never knew Jonny veerji was such a great poet!

It's quite clear that just because they "could have been" GOI agents, it's quite obvious that they weren't. The same thing can be applied to Sant Jarnail Singh Khalsa Bhindranwale when people make up rubbish. It may be possible, but it doesn't mean it's true.

N30, i've got to agree with Jonny, mainly because it's quite clear that the attack was orchestrated by the Indian government. The only way to get our voice heard is if we unify and solely blame the Indian government for it.

After we do this, the touts will come out themselves. Pointlessly pointing blame and conspiracy theories of a shaheed and someone who got acquired in a court of law doesn't help at all.

Anyone who makes a speech to harm innocent people should be shut up and disciplined and never allowed public speaking again and someone who harms an innocent person should be dealt with in the court of law.

Might read this book soon if I have time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use