Jump to content

Canada to curb activities of ‘pro-Khalistan’ extremists


Azaad
 Share

Recommended Posts

Some of dhumma supporters who used to be khalistani to the core and panthic have turned into badal supporters.

That doesnt automatically mean they dont support Khalistan. Or have stopped supporting it.

beware of goats lurking around if you know what i mean.

LOL.

longowal hired assissns to kill bhai surinder singh sodhi

No he didnt, the whole episode of Sodhi's murder was arranged by Gurcharan Singh, secretary of Akali Dal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude is denying he ever mentioned Sikhs. He said Indian politicians and media are exaggerating. Somebody is lying.

Baird Backtracks On India Trip Comments On Clamping Down On Canadian Sikhs

Canadian Foreign Minister Says He Never Mentioned Sikhs Or Any Group In Addressing Global Terrorism!

“I want to make absolutely clear that at no point during my visit did I make generalized assertions about any community in Canada, including but not limited to Canadian Sikhs,” Foreign Minister John Baird stated in an open letter to the Canadian Sikh community this week

By R. Paul Dhillon

SURREY – The LINK reported last week that during Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird’s recent trip to India to sell them nuclear reactors among other things – he apparently played into the Indian government’s hand by agreeing to clamp down on Sikhs groups demanding Khalistan but in fact agreeing to do India’s dirty work of attempting to curb the free speech of Sikhs groups who have been critical of India’s human rights abuses.

In any case, Baird never really had any authority to promise any such things and it was all cooked up by the Indian media and spread by Congress cronies through NRI news media.

“I want to make absolutely clear that at no point during my visit did I make generalized assertions about any community in Canada, including but not limited to Canadian Sikhs,” Baird stated in an open letter to the Canadian Sikh community this week

“On the contrary, in any discussion of terrorism and violent extremism with the Indian government, I very deliberately distinguished between communities who have a legitimate, democratic right to pursue political causes and those small groups of radicals who may, regrettably, embrace violence or choose criminal activity to pursue their alleged goals.”

Baird went on to laud the Sikh community and the many contributions the community has made to enrich Canada’s fabric

“Indeed, our government recognizes the many important contributions of Canadians of Indian heritage, including our vibrant and diverse Sikh community. For over 100 years, Canadians of Sikh faith have worked hard and contributed to our country in all fields, including through military service. That the Sikh community has preserved, grown, and succeeded despite the challenges the community faced is a testament to the strength and determination of men and women of Sikh background across Canada,” Baird said.

“I would note, in particular, the contributions to public life of Parliamentarians of Sikh heritage, including the Honourable Tim Uppal, appointed to Cabinet by Prime Minister Stephen Harper in May 2011. Prime Minister Harper, the Cabinet and indeed all Canadians benefit from his many talents and considered perspectives.”

On September 12, while meeting his Indian counterpart SM Krishana in New Delhi, the Indian media and as an extension NRI media reported that Minister Baird vowed to prevent activities in Canada by Sikhs campaigning for separate homeland in India.

These comments immediately led to Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), a human rights group, demanding resignation of Baird because his statement maligned the lawful activities of Canadian Sikhs and violates the constitution of Canada.

Since the 2010 visit of Indian Minister Kamal Nath to Canada, Canadian Sikhs have intensified the campaign to raise awareness about the Genocide of Sikhs (1984-98); against the continuous denial of justice for the victims of this Genocide and the blatant practice of impunity for all those responsible for organizing the Genocide. In June 2010 Members of Parliament presented the Sikh Genocide Petition before the House of Commons, which was supported by thousands of Canadians.

According to Jatinder Singh Grewal, Director SFJ Canada, it is alarming that voice of Sikh Citizens of Canada is being muzzled by their own Government under the pressure from foreign regime notorious for its practices of torture, extra judicial killings and impunity towards killers of Sikhs. We strongly object to India’s interference into Canada’s internal affairs and will not allow a foreign regime to dictate our government, added Grewal.

Demanding retraction of Baird’s statement and his expulsion, the NGO’s memo to PM Stephen stated that “the assurance of curbing the activities of Canadian Sikhs given by John Baird to India’s Minister for External Affairs not only violates Canada’s constitution, international law, Canadian values but it also puts into question the moral legitimacy of your government as it fails to stand with the victims of human rights violations to gain economic benefits. Mr. Prime Minister, it is your duty to protect Canadian’s “freedom of speech and expression” as provided in Charter of Rights and Freedom. As Canadians, it is frightening to see the voice of Canadian Sikhs is being muzzled by your Cabinet member John Baird.”

According to Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, legal advisor to SFJ who practices human rights law, Canadian Government has constitutional duty to uphold Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and prosecute those committed or participated in human rights violations. Instead, Canada is shaking hands with India for economic benefits while turning a blind eye to India’s deteriorating record on human rights.

SFJ announced to release “Sikh Genocide-1984” report in November 2012 in Ottawa to appraise the House of Commons about the facts, figures and true magnitude of genocidal attacks on Sikhs and the subsequent cover up by the Indian Government.

Baird said in his letter that all Canadians expect our government to make the distinction between those seeking grievances and addressing human rights issues and those pursuing violent means, and also to do our part to fight terrorism and other forms of violent extremism. In Canada’s case, this includes cooperating with other countries to aggressively combat terrorism in all its forms.

“Canada takes its international obligations and its domestic responsibilities in this regard extremely seriously. Canada also promotes and protects freedom of speech, freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly. These are not mutually exclusive—something not lost on me on this trip, or any other for that matter,” Baird said.

“I appreciate the opportunity to correct any impression to the contrary.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use