Jump to content

Central London in the early hours


Guest West London Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Regarding the act of trying to get rid of Brar, what does sangat think? Was it a wise thing to do taking into account the possible ramifications for Sikhs and Sikh rights in the UK, or does what happened in 1984 override any sense of trying to get things done through official, peaceful channels?

I ask because I can foresee a situation where we're going to start having to pull out the classic "Sikhism is a peaceful religion" whenever the media wants Sikhs to condemn certain acts by other pumped up Sikhs acting on their own volition. Without blowing my own trumpet I said this time would come around two years ago, whereby there'd be situations like these occuring. It seems that time has arrived much quicker than I thought.

I understand what you're saying, but first we should see what comes out of this first and handle it accordingly.

There is something fishy and the second we admit otherwise is when we stop questioning what really was the reason for what happened or what led up to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the act of trying to get rid of Brar, what does sangat think? Was it a wise thing to do taking into account the possible ramifications for Sikhs and Sikh rights in the UK, or does what happened in 1984 override any sense of trying to get things done through official, peaceful channels?

IF it actually was Sikhs who were behind this attack, I would be proud and disappointed. Proud because they actually tried and disappointed because they messed up so badly. As regards to whether it was a wise thing...there comes a point in time where you know justice is not going to be served, and you become so, so angry because it will never happen, that you just need to do something. And even though I'm sure that those people knew who attacked Brar (assuming they were Sikhs), that this would cast Sikhs in a negative light, they decided to do so anyway. That was because they believed that punishing him was more more important than the way Sikhs were viewed in the eyes of the general public.

There will be those who totally disagree and say "Why did you do this our community, you tarnished us in the public's eyes", and then there are those who agree. It basically comes down to this, would you rather Brar punished for his heinous acts than be viewed highly in the eyes of Britishers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF it actually was Sikhs who were behind this attack, I would be proud and disappointed. Proud because they actually tried and disappointed because they messed up so badly. As regards to whether it was a wise thing...there comes a point in time where you know justice is not going to be served, and you become so, so angry because it will never happen, that you just need to do something. And even though I'm sure that those people knew who attacked Brar (assuming they were Sikhs), that this would cast Sikhs in a negative light, they decided to do so anyway. That was because they believed that punishing him was more more important than the way Sikhs were viewed in the eyes of the general public.

There will be those who totally disagree and say "Why did you do this our community, you tarnished us in the public's eyes", and then there are those who agree. It basically comes down to this, would you rather Brar punished for his heinous acts than be viewed highly in the eyes of Britishers.

It's not about being viewed highly in the eyes of the British or anything like that. It's about having the moral higher ground so you can say "We've done things the right way, because this is what our faith is about."

The British government and their supporters are as hypocritical as the rest of them, but when we want our voice to be heard then we must function in a manner which shows us to be whiter than white, free from accusation, etc.

If some people did know Brar was in the UK, what would've been fantastic is if they'd devised some placards with the word "MURDERER" written on them, and hounded him (keeping a safe distance of course) and followed him wherever he went for a full day. Sooner or later someone in the general public would've fished out their phone and recorded the disturbance and uploaded it up to YouTube or somewhere like that. You never know a news camera crew may have turned up as well. THEN we have the initiative, then we can educate the public what this man did to innocent Sikhs in 1984, then we tell the public there are others like this man who have not been brought to justice for their actions. It would've sent the ball rolling! That's what I would've done.

What's happened now is that WE are on the back foot, on the defensive, when we should've every right to have gone on the - metaphorical - attack by saying "Look at how India shields the perpetrators of violence and death on Sikhs". Now, the news is dominated by how an elderley ex-army general fought off 4 Sikhs and lived to tell the tale! Wow, what a hero for facing down those young bucks and is still kicking! He must be a very brave man, etc.

So like I said earlier the initiative has been lost, and at a moment when we had every right and opportunity to shepherd our plight towards the attention of the wider public we've managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. And yes, Brar's death may have been a victory in the eyes of some, but it would've been temporary. To see him leave England with his tail between his legs - after having been exposed in the public - would've been the true victory and a message to the likes of Tytler, Kumar, etc., that you aren't welcome to walk the streets of this country without having your past evil acts brought to the attention of the public.

Then what propaganda would the Indian media machine have spun against Sikhs? That we are waging "war" using peaceful means such as protests, etc? Imagine the positive P.R. for Sikhs if that would've happened! The Indians wouldn't have a leg to stand on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest West London Singh

Well now. God moves in mysterious ways. Things haven't turned out quite the way the Indians would have liked. Imagine for one moment you get caught eating an extra plate of buffet than you were allowed to. There will be some sort of police punishment, but not the sort that we see you winning a free holiday at one of her majesty's hotels. Thats exactly the sort of slap on the wrist the 2 that are charged are facing, with their 'assault' charge. So thats the British police, the British crown prosecution service and the British criminal justice system basically saying to Brar and the Indians : "No !!! It was NOT an attempted murder. It was an assault".

Of course we will now see wall to wall coverage on the Indian news media with the headline 'Sikhs did not attempt to murder Brar'. Won't we ???? :blink2:

So lets recap :

Britain tells India Sikhs did not attempt to murder Brar.

Britain as a whole has found out about the crimes against humanity committed by Brar.

The British police, in their zeal to please the Indians, are now the subject to vast and clear claims of making illegal arrests, for which they will have to pay vast compensation.

My advice to Britain is to stay well clear of the Indians in future. When you come into too close a contact with feaces, the feaces has a habit of rubbing off on you. You get tainted with the same feaces smell.

I for one will certainly do my best to ensure the British public are made aware of how the lying, cheating Indians have blackened the good name of the British justice system in the space of a week.

This whole thing really hasn't turned out quite the way India would have liked. :biggrin2:

btw Mehtab Singh. I can log on no problem, but just as before, each thread I visit when logged on says I cannot post a reply to this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use