Jump to content

Sikhs attack restaurant in Leicester


Jpal3
 Share

Recommended Posts

Pakiz were charged regarding a case that is several weeks old and it was done purely to pacify the tensions in leicester - arrest some Singhs and arrest some Muslims, this how these situations work. We will see what happens to them in the trial - that will be the true test. Are you able to confirm to me that the guys who were stabbed up were paedo groomers? Or were they just at the wrong place at the wrong time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations to those Singhs who have risked their own livelihoods to avenge this rape.

One wonders, had they not done what they did, would we have ever known about this heinous crime? Would these pakistani muslims have been arrested, let alone charged? Afterall, it was only last week that Nihal was discussing this and the general theme that emerged from that discussion (the majority of the callers were pakistani muslim) was "it's simply a rumour" and "Sikh men have a habit of violence" as well as "when will Sikh men accept that their women prefer us over them?".

Within 7 days, 5 pakistani men arrested and charged with one 15 yr old pending further enquiries. 21 sexual offences. Not bad considering only last week it "was only a rumour".

Yes, I agree this is the tip of the ice berg. Yes, many more crimes have been committed against Sikh women from pakistani muslims. Yes, when questioned on discussion programmes by commentators like Nihal, we the Sikh community fail to convey how/where/why this occurs. That doesn't mean it doesn't occur!

This should serve as a catalyst to other Sikh women to also come forward.

It is on record that some Imam's have been commiting paedophiliac and sexual acts towards children in mosques for three decades in the Lancashire, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire and West and East Midlands regions. It is on record that younger pakistani muslim men have been grooming non-pakistani, non-muslim women in the north of England (and currently a trial is ongoing in Oxfordshire) for several years also. Pakistani muslims have an inherent sick disorder of sexual repression and a disproportionate and alarming practice of sexual exploitation concerning vulnerable young women outside of their community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hammertime007,

Nihal is simply facilitating the discussion. It was the callers (nearly all pakistani men) who were saying those things. Not Nihal. Afterall, it isn't Nihals fault if the Sikh dont call in and give the other side or truth as it were. He is chairing the discussion and therefore can not take sides.

I know Nihal reads these forums and if you're reading Nihal, I would welcome it if you were to revisit this topic on your live call-in discussions given the arrests and the pakistani men being charged. Surely, without doing so you've simply only allowed one side of the discussion to be given airtime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hammertime007,

Nihal is simply facilitating the discussion. It was the callers (nearly all pakistani men) who were saying those things. Not Nihal. Afterall, it isn't Nihals fault if the Sikh dont call in and give the other side or truth as it were. He is chairing the discussion and therefore can not take sides.

I know Nihal reads these forums and if you're reading Nihal, I would welcome it if you were to revisit this topic on your live call-in discussions given the arrests and the pakistani men being charged. Surely, without doing so you've simply only allowed one side of the discussion to be given airtime.

The debate Nihal had turned in to a talk just "Pakistani Men Going out With/Marrying Sikh Girls" Grooming of children wasn't even mentioned.

Mixed Relationships between adults is nothing like grooming of children.

All the callers were talking about marriages/relationship of Pakistan men and Sikh girls, this is not why the incident took place in Leicester.

When the Pakistani men were calling in talking bout their marriage or Sikh girls friends Nihal should have stopped them, and said the incident in Leicester was to do with Grooming of Children (including Sikh Girls) by Pakistani Men, but he didn't.

Nihal's programme is very anti Sikh, the fact he or The Pakistani callers didnt mention grooming of Sikh girls by Pakistani men just shows they don't acknowledge it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Singh

Answer my question please - can you confirm if the guys who were stabbed up were Paedo groomers or were they randoms?

Not all Pakstani men groom Girls, but most on street groomers are Pakistani.

Urgent attention required: the leicester singhs who stood up against those grooming paedos will be attending Leicester crown court on 1st Feb @ 9am. To all you out there, let's turn up to show our support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A question to "Sri-Lankan Nihal", i am calling you "Sri Lankan Nihal" as you always bracket people and now i am bracketing you.

When Muslims are in the news for negative disorder in the UK or negative reporting you calling them "Asian" When its Sikhs you call them Sikhs why is this, i've heard this in your debates and BBC reporting many times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uk sikh sangat seriously needed a strong political voice and presence who can raise such issues and introduce laws. Oversmart such low class people by putting strict law against their evil actions. I don't find any reason why such laws concerning child safety won't pass by public. That is the only most effective way to do things in this age.

However respect to those who did something rather than people like me sitting on couch and let things do on their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol if only it was that simple.

There is legislation and laws against this. But that doesnt mean anyone in power cares.

Britain has a history of secret societies who love sexual exploitation and using sex to reinforce the class system. Sexual exploitation also took place in their colonies, including Punjab whether we like to admit it or not. Muslims coming here and doing this is excused because if it was stopped it would draw light onto the depravities that take place in white society. Many well to do middle class men in England travel abroad to abuse children in places like Thailand/Vietnam/India etc. Many of them have positions of responsibility in the very institutions that should stop this - but what do you think they do for the rest of the year when they arent on holiday?

If a Sikh leader even broached this subject, most people would pay lip service, drag up Islamophobia or play it off as 'Sikhs being stupid'.

If you dont believe me about what Britain really is like, watch this video and then tell me if the parallels arent there:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know a Rajput Uncle who is a councillor and he wears the regular panjabi pagh. I wouldn't know he is a rajput because coul easily fit into any panjabi sikh or jatt background. But I can tell from his surname.  However when I look at proper Rajputs they were warriors and kings with those kind of paghs, similar to wearing dumallas or shahi turbans, some looked like Nihang Singhs! And Rajput background sikhs were involved in shastarvidiya training with Guru Hargobind and Guru Gobind Singh, as well as becoming their sikhs.    A rajput background sikh has double responsibilities to maintain turban and also training shastar. I think a Nihang Singh type look is more suitable for a sikh from Rajput background than any patiala shahi or average panjabi pagh
    • "Preserve Shastar Vidiya any way you can."(Rattan Singh Bhangu, Siri Guru Panth Parkash, ed. Dr Balwant Singh Dhillon, 36)
    • what kinda pagh are you tying that is taking more than 5 minutes? Actually puraatan maryada is to sit cross legged and cover your feet, tying pagh sitting down. The standing up may hurt your head.  Turban is not a hatm, many shaheediyaa have been given for the cost of this turban. MAryada is to tie fresh each time, and also twice a day. I kanga my kes twice a day and do keski twice a daym sometimes do my pagh or dumalla the 2nd time as well if I am going out. Just sit down, put a mirror in front and there should be not stress on your neck.
    • I was at the Slough Singh Sabha gurdwara last week. I think he was a teen, a tall young Singh got a deep gash wound on his arm from gatka, somewhere near his wrist. He was already on the floor when I entered through the langar hall, but I am sure he did it to himself not through a gatka "battle". I am unsure which shastar he used. I checked and the shastars seemed lightweight for the children. I picked up the khanda and it was light, not like a real khanda. I really want to emphasise that we should not be promoting twirly sword dancing as a "sikh martial art". This young Singh was hurting and gasping - why are we teaching twirling swords around in a way that may hurt oneself?? Promote shastarvidiya savai raksha and other martial arts which are about causing damage to the enemy. Why are we teaching this style of twirly gatka that's detrimental/harmful to ourselves and our allies? A twirly sword might hurt an ally in a battle, and doesn't allow allied warriors good movement around the sword twirler. This also reminds me during the summer, they were teaching some move to kids where you do some spins with the feet and then do a backwards bhangra type jump. I wasn't sure if this was a martial art or bhangra being taught?! Also at another gurdwara in another city/town in the midlands, the year before at a kids sikh club a guest gatka teacher was teaching basics to little kids by making then practice making infinity symbols with the gatka sticks!!! If we are showing off something ineffective and also harmful to the practitioner and allied warriors, then it's nothing to be proud off! If we are going to show our puraatan shastars off, we need to do it in a respectable manner not in this archaic colonial gatka era! The teaching is just as embarrassing as the last 2 decades and I don't understand why we want to promote it as a sikh martial art, to the sangat and to outsiders? the injuries are just not worth it for learning this modern gatka!    "Preserve Shastar Vidiya any way you can."(Rattan Singh Bhangu, Siri Guru Panth Parkash, ed. Dr Balwant Singh Dhillon, 36)
    • Bro, as stated above, you can do whatever you want. No one is snatching your starched turban, 2 weeks old, from your head. But what you want is for Guru's Singhs to call your turban in accordance with rehit. That's not going to happen. Also, why can't you simply tie your starched turban fresh every day? (Genuine question)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use