Jump to content

Washing Darbar Sahib Floor With Milk Is Equal To ShivJi's ** - Singh Sabha Canada


DSGj
 Share

Recommended Posts

Rotation of Mecca and Panjokhra Sahib issue veerji I don't either believe leave aside Dilgeer.

Showing miracles is against Gurmat.

Then you have to discard Bhai gurdas from sikhism. Do you believe that sikhi is a mystic religion.

Miracles are not caused, they happen by will of God. Those who do not believe in this may join another religion.

You have no inkling what you are talking about? Do you believe that Guru sahib went to Mecca or not?

No. u'r wrong.

Do you contest that Bhai Mani singh has put Harmandir sahib maryada in black and white? Answer yes or no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many times sahib singh read Guru Granth sahib? he never did naam simran. What does he know about sikh traditions without naam simran? Bhai Randhir singh ji lived sikhi.There is no comparison.



What do you mean by yes or no?

Your translation of Gurbani is right and mine is wrong who taught you this.

Bhai Mani Singh started washing darbar sahib with kachi lassi lol you need some serious study of history.

I am asking you a question. The question is do you contest that Bhai mani singh put Haramdir sahib maryada in black and white?

have you seen the floor of Harmandir sahib?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bhai Randhir Singh translated according to his understanding and jathebandi.

Prof. Sahib Singh never did naam simran. Reading and living according to gurbani is also simran.

Kachi lassi is not a maryada started by Bhai Mani Singh. This is fact.

Which maryada was started by Bhai Mani Singh?

I am asking you a question? Do you know that Bhai mani singh put maryada in black and white.Black and white means in written form? Do not stray from that. We will talk about simran separately and i will prove that those who do not believe in naam simran are misled people.

Plus you have to give reference of facebook contents that you posted.It is a propaganda without proper reference.Do not be misled.Those who manage Darbar sahib are well aware of sikh traditions and are following a maryada of letting people in with IDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gurdip s johal writes

Prof. Sahib Singh never did naam simran. Reading and living according to gurbani is also simran.

Essence of Guru Granth sahib teachings is naam simran. You write gurbani is naam simran.What happens if a person is not lettered and cann't read Guru Granth sahib or Gurbani? Is he debarred from realizing God?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am asking you a question? Do you know that Bhai mani singh put maryada in black and white.Black and white means in written form? Do not stray from that. We will talk about simran separately and i will prove that those who do not believe in naam simran are misled people.

Bring that Maryada black and white?

Regarding literacy that is what distorted our history sikhs were not learned enough to write there history

and people who were well versed with ramayana and mahabharat wrote our history.

Anpad people goes to dera, follow them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring that Maryada black and white?

Regarding literacy that is what distorted our history sikhs were not learned enough to write there history

and people who were well versed with ramayana and mahabharat wrote our history.

Anpad people goes to dera, follow them.

So your answer is Bhai Mani singh did not write maryada of darbar sahib. Am i getting you right.

So you say if a person is not lettered and can not read Gurbani cann't realize God. Am i getting you right?

So you are taeching us biparvaad now.

Keep in mind academic and spiritual education are not same>Missionaries have none of them neither academic ( 8 and 10 graders writing themselves professors) nor spiritual as they deny existence of soul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So your answer is Bhai Mani singh did not write maryada of darbar sahib. Am i getting you right.

So you say if a person is not lettered and can not read Gurbani cann't realize God. Am i getting you right?

So you are taeching us biparvaad now.

Keep in mind academic and spiritual education are not same>Missionaries have none of them neither academic ( 8 and 10 graders writing themselves professors) nor spiritual as they deny existence of soul.

Hahahaha

You are getting everything wrong.

Missionaries are 8 or 10 grades who cares.

Most of the Baba lot never even went to school.

Bring that maryada that was written by Bhai Mani Singh.

Guru Sahib invented gurmukhi and his followers are still stuck with literacy factor.

Literacy was the basic reason why our history is distorted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use