Jump to content

Washing Darbar Sahib Floor With Milk Is Equal To ShivJi's ** - Singh Sabha Canada


DSGj
 Share

Recommended Posts

@ Jonny Paji ... Bilcul kissay nay ay nayhee kay'ah kay Sikh Panth Langar da prabandh nayhee kar rayah haii laykin sirf kay assi ik "expenditure" hohr vi seva vaal lah sak'dhay ah (and Paji you have to tell me how you manage to type in Gurmukhi and what the program you have is!? :-)

Essentially the point being not that the Sikh Panth doesn't do seva - we all know that Sikh Panth does more seva in India than all the Mandirs, Masjids and Churches combined - however, nevertheless when it comes to gold, marble, construction costs on new Gurdwaray (particularly in the West), using milk for cleaning etc, etc we have to be very careful not to lose sight of our primary focus of uplifting the oppressed and downtrodden ... rather than succumbing to the same issues that the Hindu's, Muslims and Christians are guilty of - namely that the Hindu's, Muslims and Christians often look at what looks good for "dakhaavah" first ... instead of tackling statistics like the fact that 47% of children in India suffer from a degree of malnutrition as the first issue as Guru Sahib has commanded us to do.

veerji, if someone is feeling hungry they have Guru da Langar where they can eat as much as they want. No one is stopping them. ਹਾਂ, ਜੇ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਵਾਧੂ ਕੁਝ ਹੋਰ ਕਰਨਾ ਚਾਹੋ ਤਾਂ ਬੇਸ਼ਕ ਕਰੋ। ਆਪ ਕਰੋ ਤੇ ਹੋਰਨਾ ਨੂੰ ਭੀ ਕਰਵਾਉ। ਪਰ ਪਿਹਲਾਂ ਆਪ ਮਿਸਾਲ ਬਣਕੇ ਤਾ ਵਖਾਉ।

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Writer of Twarikh Sri Amritsar and Twarikh Amritsar writes

Water was used to clean the floor but when did this Kachi lassi concept came is not clear.

Written by the same author as below. Are we going to trust such authors now?

In his latest writings, Dilgeer rakes up further controversy by:

� Claiming Guru Gobind Singh Ji never took Khanday-battay-da-Amrit from the Panth Piyaray, negating the concept of "ਆਪੇ ਗੁਰੁ ਚੇਲਾ".

� Dismissing the historical fact that Guru Arjan Dev Ji was were never martyred on a "ਤੱਤੀ ਤਵੀ"

� Dismissing the historical fact connected to Panjokhra Sahib regarding Sri Guru Harkrishan Sahib Ji blessing Chajju the water carrier to recite the Gita.

� Dismissing the historical fact of Guru Nanak Dev Ji's rotation of the Kabba at Mecca.

� Dismissing the historical fact of Guru Tegh Buhadur Sahib saving Makhan Shah Lubana's merchant ship from sinking.

http://www.panthic.org/articles/5168

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Written by the same author as below. Are we going to trust such authors now?

In his latest writings, Dilgeer rakes up further controversy by:

� Claiming Guru Gobind Singh Ji never took Khanday-battay-da-Amrit from the Panth Piyaray, negating the concept of "ਆਪੇ ਗੁਰੁ ਚੇਲਾ".

� Dismissing the historical fact that Guru Arjan Dev Ji was were never martyred on a "ਤੱਤੀ ਤਵੀ"

� Dismissing the historical fact connected to Panjokhra Sahib regarding Sri Guru Harkrishan Sahib Ji blessing Chajju the water carrier to recite the Gita.

� Dismissing the historical fact of Guru Nanak Dev Ji's rotation of the Kabba at Mecca.

� Dismissing the historical fact of Guru Tegh Buhadur Sahib saving Makhan Shah Lubana's merchant ship from sinking.

http://www.panthic.org/articles/5168

Twarikh Amritsar written by Karam Singh Historian

Twarikh Sri Amritsar written by Giani Gyan Singh.

Both Author are from pre-gurdwara reform movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Missionary ideology will never stop raising unnecessary stuff and diverts Kaum energy from important issues.

Fact is that, People when do not agree with facts starting saying missionary ideology.

The fact about Makhan Shah Labana is that he came on Diwali(October) to give his daswand.

In August Ardass of Gurship for Guru Teg Bahadur was done.

Guru Nanak Sahib "ਆਪੇ ਗੁਰੁ ਚੇਲਾ"

Well I hope Paaji you know that.

Rotation of Mecca and Panjokhra Sahib issue veerji I don't either believe leave aside Dilgeer.

Showing miracles is against Gurmat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fact is that, People when do not agree with facts starting saying missionary ideology.

The fact about Makhan Shah Labana is that he came on Diwali(October) to give his daswand.

In August Ardass of Gurship for Guru Teg Bahadur was done.

Guru Nanak Sahib "ਆਪੇ ਗੁਰੁ ਚੇਲਾ"

Well I hope Paaji you know that.

Rotation of Mecca and Panjokhra Sahib issue veerji I don't either believe leave aside Dilgeer.

Showing miracles is against Gurmat.

Do you also believe as Dilgeer that Panja Sahib saakhi did not happen?

The Makkah rotation Saakhi is mentioned by non other than Bhai Gurdas Jee. I have more faith in Bhai Gurdas Ji than in dilgir. Even Bhagat Naamdev Jee's jeevani there is Saakhi of a Mandhir that was rotated and is mentioned in Gurbani. In Bhagat Kabir Jee's bani there are mentions of miracles occurring Makhan Shah Lubana saakhi cannot be dismissed because of a date issue. Historically dates have been written wrongly in primary sources as well. Guru Ji is the master of Akaali Shaktis. He can use them as he pleases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dilgeer Does not deny Panja Sahib sakhi.

He is a historian and have resources to differentiate between truth and myth.

In that case, he is denying a credible source like Bhai Gurdas Jee which mentions Makkah rotating. He does deny Panja Sahib saakhi. I heard him say it in a recorded interview about 2 years ago. Panja Sahib there is physical proof of that miracle occuring, the big rock till date has the imprint of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Jee's hand. I have met Pakistani Muslims who also believe the Panja Sahib Saakhi occured. Seems like we have non Sikhs who have more faith in Panja Sahib Saakhi than Kala Afghanists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that case, he is denying a credible source like Bhai Gurdas Jee which mentions Makkah rotating. He does deny Panja Sahib saakhi. I heard him say it in a recorded interview about 2 years ago. Panja Sahib there is physical proof of that miracle occuring, the big rock till date has the imprint of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Jee's hand. I have met Pakistani Muslims who also believe the Panja Sahib Saakhi occured. Seems like we have non Sikhs who have more faith in Panja Sahib Saakhi than Kala Afghanists.

You are entitled to your views, Dilgeer has his own and I have my own view.

People who believe in Bipar ideology will believe in miracles.

ਕੋਈ ਮੁਗਲੁ ਨ ਹੋਆ ਅੰਧਾ ਕਿਨੈ ਨ ਪਰਚਾ ਲਾਇਆ ॥੪॥

Koee Mugal N Hoaa Andhhaa Kinai N Parachaa Laaeiaa ||4||

कोई मुगलु न होआ अंधा किनै न परचा लाइआ ॥४॥

None of the Mugals went blind, and no one performed any miracle. ||4||

At time of Babar People claimed that they will make enemy army blind.

This incident is in the above Tuk.

And veerji if you go by believing then christian and muslime believe in Adam and eve, what can we make of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use