Sant Samaj

[KhoonKaBadlaKhoon]

I see that recently Sant Samaj has sided with Sikhs, over Badal/SGPC, in the whole Ram Rahim mess. Even though in the past they have often submitted to Badal raj. They've also in the past taken pro-Bhindranwala stances. The fact that they seem to be jumping ship all the time, makes me want to learn more about this little "board of directors" thing they got going on. Anyone on here more knowledgable about the Sant Samaj? Its history? or which organizations are allowed to have members in it?

[SadSingh]

I see that recently Sant Samaj has sided with Sikhs, over Badal/SGPC, in the whole Ram Rahim mess. Even though in the past they have often submitted to Badal raj. They've also in the past taken pro-Bhindranwala stances. The fact that they seem to be jumping ship all the time, makes me want to learn more about this little "board of directors" thing they got going on. Anyone on here more knowledgable about the Sant Samaj? Its history? or which organizations are allowed to have members in it?

Remember Sant Samaj and its head Harnam Singh Dumma are close friends of badal. Badal could easily make harnam singh dumma jathedar to quiet everyone and still have control of akal takhat.

[SadSingh]

On a side note why would someone be part of a group call "Sant Samaj", wouldn't that be a ego boost

[jkvlondon]

On a side note why would someone be part of a group call "Sant Samaj", wouldn't that be a ego boost

As far as I know the only legit sants are the ones that never found the need to be on a board of 'sants'....

considering that this current situation may remove the other four jathedars who may not be as probadal as bachana and replace them with proRSS ones for sure should be considered ...after all the meeting took 6 hours to persuade them to follow the party line .

[KhoonKaBadlaKhoon]

Remember Sant Samaj and its head Harnam Singh Dumma are close friends of badal. Badal could easily make harnam singh dumma jathedar to quiet everyone and still have control of akal takhat.

While I agree Dhumma can't be trusted 100% we have to remember, many of the groups involved in organizing this Sarbat Khalsa are not under the control of Badal. This is the only that gives me some hope for this Sarbat Khalsa.

As far as I know the only legit sants are the ones that never found the need to be on a board of 'sants'....

considering that this current situation may remove the other four jathedars who may not be as probadal as bachana and replace them with proRSS ones for sure should be considered ...after all the meeting took 6 hours to persuade them to follow the party line .

Isn't it just the Akal Takht jathedar who they intend on removing?

[jkvlondon]

While I agree Dhumma can't be trusted 100% we have to remember, many of the groups involved in organizing this Sarbat Khalsa are not under the control of Badal. This is the only that gives me some hope for this Sarbat Khalsa.

Isn't it just the Akal Takht jathedar who they intend on removing?

can't the sarbat khalsa clear house totally by firing appointed staffers of sgpc also apart from removing jathedars , announce badal pariwar as excommunicated (A clear idea that should be implemented and the removing of panth rattan to replace with panth dokhi)

[DSGkeepingitreal]

On a side note why would someone be part of a group call "Sant Samaj", wouldn't that be a ego boost

Exactly, it's all a made-up show.

And I won't even begin on the chelas.....

As far as I know the only legit sants are the ones that never found the need to be on a board of 'sants'....

considering that this current situation may remove the other four jathedars who may not be as probadal as bachana and replace them with proRSS ones for sure should be considered ...after all the meeting took 6 hours to persuade them to follow the party line .

Exactly.

Also, the Jathedars are already under RSS, almost everything is.

While I agree Dhumma can't be trusted 100% we have to remember, many of the groups involved in organizing this Sarbat Khalsa are not under the control of Badal. This is the only that gives me some hope for this Sarbat Khalsa.

http://www.tribunein...10919/main1.htm

It's the so-called saintly people who themselves team up with Badal-type people.

And you're talking about puppets? The same people that are 'Panthic' and 'Gursikhs' and that you want controlling Sikh affairs/management....they themselves are the biggest puppets.

Not too long ago people wanted Gurbakhsh Singh (hunger strike) to become Jathedar and now people are calling him a traitor. Who is going to become leaders/managers/position holders?

Read the following articles and you will see, 99% of people are fake.

True!

Back to topic of RSS, it seems like everyone has a link to RSS. Recently Bhai Baldev Singh Vadala has said on video/recording that Hazoor Sahib or Patna Sahib (I forget which one he said) is going to be given to RSS and that other lands/buildings and institutions are going to be in the hands of companies.

Go through the following links, and it will be very clear that everyone has their hands dirty unfortunately. Even Khalsa College is in the hands of RSS.

Please once again, take the time to go through the following links, you will see how 99% of people are fake, very few keep it real.

Go through each link with an open mind, don't be stuck with a certain Baba or Jathebandi. Read the links with the thought in mind that your only alliance is with Vahiguru. Then the whole picture will be revealed to you about what is going on.

1. http://www.<span>pan...>/articles/3705
2. http://www.panthic.o...2006-01-08.html
3. http://www.panthic.o...2006-01-15.html
4. http://www.panthic.o...2006-01-22.html
5. http://www.panthic.o...2006-02-05.html
6. http://www.panthic.o...2006-02-12.html
7. http://www.<span>pan...>/articles/2232
8. http://www.<span>pan...>/articles/3107
9. http://www.<span>pan...>/articles/5355
10. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/5036
11. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/4985
12. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/4684
13. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/4530
14. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/5071
15. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/5047
16. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/4556
17. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/4540
18. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/4169
19. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/4060
20. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/4108
21. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/4356
22. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/3791
23. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/3153
24. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/3126
25. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/3828
26. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/3788
27. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/3792
28. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/3768
29. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/2938
30. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/2767
31. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/3082
32. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/2890
33. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/2683
34. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/2247
35. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/2209
36. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/2391
37. http://<span>panthic...>/articles/2044
38. http://www.<span>pan...>/articles/2676
39. http://www.<span>pan...>/articles/4754
40. http://www.panthic.o...2008-07-25.html
41. http://www.panthic.o...2008-08-29.html