Is Sikhism A Organised 'religion' If So Is That Antithetical To The Teaching Of Gurmat?

[singh598]

Look at what SGPC has done to Darbar Sahib making it a tourist attraction like as if it's the Sikh Vatican 

 

where only certain individuals issues commands whereas Gurmat is that the sangat select the rehitvaan chardikala persons to direct the panth

[MisterrSingh]

3 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Since the above poster has taken the thread off topic. .

Explain how WITHOUT getting personal, offended, or generally doing what you do.  

[Not2Cool2Argue]

Ofc sikhi isnt against gurmat!!!!

The Gurus were not just rebels against tradition, denouncers of hypocrisy, questioners of prevalent practices. The gurus did not just question and find fault with religions. Like modern liberals do. They also offered a solution, an alternative path, and the answers. The Gurus did not come just to condemn society, they came to bring a message, a path, a panth, a religion.

How is an organized religion antithetical to wat the gurus wanted? Sangat is very much praised by the gurus. Dharamsalas, gurudwaras, and cities like kartarpur were built to bring sikhs all together. Also sikhs were to believe the same things, come to meet regularly at divaali, vaisakhi, sangraad, as well as meet locally at nearest dharamsala daily.

How is that not an organized religion? As for the priestly class, we r not supposed to have one, i think. But guru ji talks alot about sants, sadhus etc.and meeting them and learning from them. 

So like, ya, guru ji himself gave us doctrine, scripture, code of conduct, ceremonies such as amrit sanchaar, commanded us to meet up regularly and praised the saints. 

So how is it that gurmat is not organized religion?