Jump to content

Has anyone watched Nanak Naam video on thw meaning of Ik?


Redoptics
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Redoptics said:

Think this guy is doing great seva, does anybody watch his videos.

 

its just like making a two hour video on what is the meaning of a table.

 

''ohh its gods creation..'' '''ohhh its practical too'..'' ''ooh its got four legs, symbolizing the power of four and four pillars of the system..'' all of it is codswallop,

IK just means one, lets leave it at that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, mahandulai said:

its just like making a two hour video on what is the meaning of a table.

 

''ohh its gods creation..'' '''ohhh its practical too'..'' ''ooh its got four legs, symbolizing the power of four and four pillars of the system..'' all of it is codswallop,

IK just means one, lets leave it at that

Did you watch it, it has nothing to do with ego, Ik is what the rest of Guru Grant Sahib Ji describes 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy from appearance and from this video seems like a good guy.  However I was watching a video he did on kaam at a Toronto singhs camp and he let out his true identity.   24 or so minutes into the video he loses all credibility. He gives credit to a nastik Harinder Singh of Sikh Research Institute who used to take Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji in a carry on luggage and rolled the luggage with Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji like Guru Sahib was another piece of item in his carry on luggage. It could have been checked in luggage.   Either way Harinder Singh mistreated Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. 

Then the Nanak naam guy goes further and says Harinder Singh says Gurbani celebrates common sexual practices.  After saying this, the Nanak naam guy, satpal Singh, says he has respect for Harinder Singh.   This is called having a perverted mind by Sikhi standards.   These guys can't control their sexual behavior and thoughts so they try legitimizing their behavior by misquoting Gurbani.

Forward the video to 24 minutes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

This guy from appearance and from this video seems like a good guy.  However I was watching a video he did on kaam at a Toronto singhs camp and he let out his true identity.   24 or so minutes into the video he loses all credibility. He gives credit to a nastik Harinder Singh of Sikh Research Institute who used to take Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji in a carry on luggage and rolled the luggage with Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji like Guru Sahib was another piece of item in his carry on luggage. It could have been checked in luggage.   Either way Harinder Singh mistreated Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. 

Then the Nanak naam guy goes further and says Harinder Singh says Gurbani celebrates common sexual practices.  After saying this, the Nanak naam guy, satpal Singh, says he has respect for Harinder Singh.   This is called having a perverted mind by Sikhi standards.   These guys can't control their sexual behavior and thoughts so they try legitimizing their behavior by misquoting Gurbani.

Forward the video to 24 minutes.

 

I appreciate that Satpal Singh is doing prachar but I think his idea of Waheguru ji is more like the universe and nature and not all loving, all powerful being as Maharaj describes.

23 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

Then the Nanak naam guy goes further and says Harinder Singh says Gurbani celebrates common sexual practices.

About this. Yes Maharaj says love your wife daily but celebrating sexual practices is going a bit too far. I don't think Mahapurakh would say that of do any of that for pleasure. Later on the video around 32 minutes he says it's okay to have it for pleasure not just procreate. Isn't that just fueling lust. And then he also says that we should not stop ourselves for going out and just staying in the Gurdwara instead. But Maharaj clearly say Gun Gava Din Raat Nanak Chao Ehu. And that we should be absorbed in Naam all day and night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RajKaregaKhalsa1 said:

I appreciate that Satpal Singh is doing prachar but I think his idea of Waheguru ji is more like the universe and nature and not all loving, all powerful being as Maharaj describes.

About this. Yes Maharaj says love your wife daily but celebrating sexual practices is going a bit too far. I don't think Mahapurakh would say that of do any of that for pleasure. Later on the video around 32 minutes he says it's okay to have it for pleasure not just procreate. Isn't that just fueling lust. And then he also says that we should not stop ourselves for going out and just staying in the Gurdwara instead. But Maharaj clearly say Gun Gava Din Raat Nanak Chao Ehu. And that we should be absorbed in Naam all day and night.

Just remember this guy isn't a Guru and will make mistakes,  the video on Ik he uses Gurbani to back up his thoughts on what Ik is, problem is we shouldn't have this split view on the matter it should be known to us all.

Just my take on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use