Jump to content

Abortion


puzzled
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh
On 2/1/2019 at 10:44 AM, Guest London jwaan said:

A pathetic jibe jagsaw......

 

London jawan, no "jibes". As a father of 2 young children I am well used to teaching how important it is to be able to express viewpoints and opinions without resorting to childish abuse and "jibes" are certainly not the way to go about getting that message across.

For you I think there is a mixture of sadness and hope. I genuinely feel sad that something in your personal life has turned you into someone just so full of anger and vicious hatred but at the same time I am hopeful that you might be able to self-reflect and see how immature and sad you come across to other people.

But, if you insist on carrying on with the anger, hatred and abuse I feel I should point out to you that you have used these 3 sentences so many times on this forum over the last year or so that people might begin to think you don't know any other sentences:

  • "Sikhs are Extremists"
  • "Sikhs wave their Kirpans about in the air like extremists"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest london jwaan
On 2/4/2019 at 9:33 AM, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

London jawan, no "jibes". As a father of 2 young children I am well used to teaching how important it is to be able to express viewpoints and opinions without resorting to childish abuse and "jibes" are certainly not the way to go about getting that message across.

For you I think there is a mixture of sadness and hope. I genuinely feel sad that something in your personal life has turned you into someone just so full of anger and vicious hatred but at the same time I am hopeful that you might be able to self-reflect and see how immature and sad you come across to other people.

But, if you insist on carrying on with the anger, hatred and abuse I feel I should point out to you that you have used these 3 sentences so many times on this forum over the last year or so that people might begin to think you don't know any other sentences:

  • "Sikhs are Extremists"
  • "Sikhs wave their Kirpans about in the air like extremists"

 

Now you see? there you go again Jagsaw - imodium time again!

Where exactly did I say that "Sikhs are extremists"? I have stated that you, amongst others, are in actual fact are extremists - and I stand behind that. Warm your 2 brain cells up by rubbing them together to try and comprehend that if a sikh is an extremist - it does not mean that all sikhs are extremists. You c0ck.

And as far as kirpans go, just the tone of your bukwaas, jattism and the logic you portray shows that you are an exaggerating, hyperbole, tabloid newspaper type of <banned word filter activated> that probably did a bit of work experience at the Sunday sport and is stupid enough to think that quoting entirely made up statistics validates your bukwaas. And yes i do believe that you sit at home looking for an excuse to wave your kirpan around your head thinking that you are standing up for the community or performing some sort of agitation (against no one in particular), when in actual fact you are acting like a c0ck and living up to stereotypes.

And dont act all hard done by, getting banned from this forum for your extremism and having to change your nickname from West London Sikh to Jagsaw to Jigsaw to disassociate yourself from your earlier vitriol is pathetic in the extreme. Whats Next? Jogsaw or Jugsaw?

Waheguru ji ka khalsa, waheguru ji ki fateh

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh
13 hours ago, Guest london jwaan said:

Now you see? there you go again Jagsaw - imodium time again!

Where exactly did I say that "Sikhs are extremists"? I have stated that you, amongst others, are in actual fact are extremists - and I stand behind that. Warm your 2 brain cells up by rubbing them together to try and comprehend that if a sikh is an extremist - it does not mean that all sikhs are extremists. You c0ck.

And as far as kirpans go, just the tone of your bukwaas, jattism and the logic you portray shows that you are an exaggerating, hyperbole, tabloid newspaper type of <banned word filter activated> that probably did a bit of work experience at the Sunday sport and is stupid enough to think that quoting entirely made up statistics validates your bukwaas. And yes i do believe that you sit at home looking for an excuse to wave your kirpan around your head thinking that you are standing up for the community or performing some sort of agitation (against no one in particular), when in actual fact you are acting like a c0ck and living up to stereotypes.

And dont act all hard done by, getting banned from this forum for your extremism and having to change your nickname from West London Sikh to Jagsaw to Jigsaw to disassociate yourself from your earlier vitriol is pathetic in the extreme. Whats Next? Jogsaw or Jugsaw?

Waheguru ji ka khalsa, waheguru ji ki fateh

 

?   What a thoroughly strange and twisted fellow you are London Jawan. A very strange fellow indeed.

Anger is an Acid by Mark Twain - Source: TheDailyQuotes.Com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest London jwaan
On 2/6/2019 at 11:27 AM, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

?   What a thoroughly strange and twisted fellow you are London Jawan. A very strange fellow indeed.

Anger is an Acid by Mark Twain - Source: TheDailyQuotes.Com

Thoroughly strange and twisted?? Why is that? Because I have yet again highlighted where you are openly talking out of your jagsaw and talking total nonsense? Or because I have highlighted that you were banned and have to keep changing your nickname?

Go on, show me where I said that all Sikhs are extremists. You can't. 

I would suggest that what is thoroughly strange and twisted, is that you are standing there with your cucha around your ankles again, desperately trying to divert the attention from the fact that you have been caught out talking out of your jagsaw, hoping that quoting an irrelevant quip from Mark twain will some how pull your cucha up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh
16 hours ago, Guest London jwaan said:

Thoroughly strange and twisted?? Why is that? Because I have yet again highlighted where you are openly talking out of your jagsaw and talking total nonsense? Or because I have highlighted that you were banned and have to keep changing your nickname?

Go on, show me where I said that all Sikhs are extremists. You can't. 

I would suggest that what is thoroughly strange and twisted, is that you are standing there with your cucha around your ankles again, desperately trying to divert the attention from the fact that you have been caught out talking out of your jagsaw, hoping that quoting an irrelevant quip from Mark twain will some how pull your cucha up.

steve coogan shrug GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Guest Medusa
On 1/24/2019 at 5:44 PM, Akalifauj said:

Abortion is killing a baby.  

Would someone kill their parent who is solely dependent on his children because of having something wrong with his spine?

The feminist and their supporters use the word fetus to dehumanize the baby that has a distinct DNA at the point of concpetion.

A high majority of babies are aborted today because the woman was having casual sexual relationships and got pregnant.

 

 

On point Ji. very true this is. These people are in denial life begins at conception 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jigsaw_puzzled-singh

Dunno who brought this old abortion back up again but...now that is back up....I remember how, in my younger years,  one of my favourite pastimes was to tease and torment a group of African Christian fanatics that used to preach in Hanwell and West Ealing.  Reminding them that Frankincense was used in biblical times as a deodrant to hide bad odour and Myrrh was used as an abortifacient (a thing that induces an abortion) I used to ask why the wise men bought jesus's mother and father something to hide the smell and something to kill the baby with. 

Point is.....this sad debate about abortion has been around since the start of this sad faith called Christians. Away from the sad environment that perpetuates around anything Christian the rest of the world always has and always will leave it as a private decision to be made by the husband and wife themselves after much deliberation. Unless it involves the killing of a baby that is fully developed in the mother's womb this is a personal decision for the prospective parents themselves according to their own personal circumstances. None of us have any business lecturing others on what they should or should not do. Leave that sad tomfoolery to the Christians. They're good at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use