Jump to content

Abortion


puzzled
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

I don't have very strong opinions either way about this

What?? The one issue where Jigsaw doesn't have an opinion? How can this even be possible?

I mean if it's not a matter of praising your jihadi friends, brother Jigsaw has no strong opinion.

20 hours ago, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

I'm not a doctor and have no medical training whatsoever I'm not knowledgable enough to know about the development of mind and feelings in fetuses.

Do you have to be a medical doctor to know whether killing an adult is bad or not?

Do you have to be a gerontologist to know whether killing a old man is bad?

20 hours ago, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

I would like to think that when a fetus is able to experience pain it is plain murder to subject it to that pain by causing it's destruction.

OK, I applaud you for saying at least this. Which is much more than your lefty friends will admit.

20 hours ago, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

This is really a philosophical discussion about the essence of 'being'. At what stage is that fetus in it's mother's belly an actual being. ?  I don't know.

A man of philosophy. I wonder, dear Jigsaw, if you would consent to having your body torn limb from limb, to study the effects of pain, and also to delve into the nature of "being". 

All in the interests of Science, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Guest London jwaan said:

At the time of the gurus, abortion did not exist.

If you mean that tearing babies' limbs with forceps did not happen, OK, fine. However, that does not mean abortifacient herbs did not exist.

11 hours ago, Guest London jwaan said:

So by definition, sikhi does not have a clear position on abortion.

No.

No.Someone invents a new way of killing, and you say that "by definition" Sikhism doesn't have a clear position?

Is killing with chemical injections "by definition" unclear morally?

Is killing by electrocution "by definition" unclear? 

By running someone over with a car?

11 hours ago, Guest London jwaan said:

 In giving an answer, please refer to the precise slok that stipulates this or not unconditionally.

The very fact that you say that means you haven't a clue about what Gurbani is supposed to be. It's not a rulebook like the Old Testament.

It's a testament to Godliness. There's no way a Godly person could kill another being for their own benefit other than to save their life.

If that's your approach to Gurbani, you can go your entire life and not get the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Was abortion as we know it today (exterminating life in the womb) possible back in the day, or did they use to wait until the kid was born to get rid of it?

The preferred method of killing by paapis was to bury an undesired child (usually girl). Or just put her into a pot or something and not give sustenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like some have mentioned the aatma/soul enters the baby at a particular time, 3 months? I guess that's when the baby goes into a medative state,  so it would be wrong to kill it after that stage, so what about before the stage when the soul enters  is it ok to abort it then?

I'm not talking about rape cases but more about parents who are told their baby is not well and will live a challenging life. 

Parents look after their child but who will look after Him/Her when the parents are dead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, puzzled said:

Like some have mentioned the aatma/soul enters the baby at a particular time, 3 months? I guess that's when the baby goes into a medative state,  so it would be wrong to kill it after that stage, so what about before the stage when the soul enters  is it ok to abort it then?

Where is your proof to say the soul enters at 3 months?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to ask these Sikh feminists who like murdering babies in the womb how are you different than the indian government who murdered innocent Sikhs in India?  Bhai Jaswant Singh Khalra went out to find out where the bodies were and gave the body back to the family. He risked his life to stop the murders of innocent Sikhs. You place his picture on your social media walls to further your cause of being 'human' rights activists.  What makes you think  Bhai Jaswant Singh Khalra would ever support murders like you?  Did he support the indian government for murdering Sikhs?  Taking a HUMAN life is murder.  True Sikhs and human right activists will never stand for the torture and murder of anyone innocent baby, no matter where the baby is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use