Jump to content

Abortion


puzzled
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Redoptics said:

ਮਾਤ ਗਰਭ ਮਹਿ ਆਪਨ ਸਿਮਰਨੁ ਦੇ ਤਹ ਤੁਮ ਰਾਖਨਹਾਰੇ

॥ Maath Garabh Mehi Aapan Simaran Dhae Theh Thum Raakhanehaarae ||

In our mother's womb, You blessed us with Your meditative remembrance, and You preserved us there.

ਸੋਰਠਿ (ਮਃ ੫) (੧੮) ੧:੧ - ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ : ਅੰਗ ੬੧੩ ਪੰ. ੧੬  Raag Sorath Guru Arjan Dev - Ang 613

Yeah that's why it's wrong   even in the womb the child is remembering waheguru so why should the parent destroy that? 

In would never kill my child regardless of its health. What ever waheguru gives you you should accept it

Waheguru loves all children and trusted you with that child 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, puzzled said:

Yeah that's why it's wrong   even in the womb the child is remembering waheguru so why should the parent destroy that? 

In would never kill my child regardless of its health. What ever waheguru gives you you should accept it

Waheguru loves all children and trusted you with that child 

Yeah I know, thought I would post it again so it sinks in.

When we are born into rhe world, we start to forget about Vaheguru. 

Its like how as babies we can breath under water, then as we grow we just forget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

quickening is the term used to describe the point at which the child is more active and you can feel it

Right.

It's just that people (who didn't have scientific knowledge) took that to be the first sign of life.

And then, without any basis, they then took it to be the point where the soul enters the body.

Which is something that they can believe in if they want.

The problem comes about when Yogi Bhajan picks up that piece of superstition and passes it off to his followers as some kind of legitimate Sikh belief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Guest London jwaan said:

I'm sorry, but I think you might be 5......

Frustration in being able to explain a matter to someone else is generally correlated with fuzzy thinking.

21 hours ago, Guest London jwaan said:

"Meaningless sounds"??? What the devil are you on about?

You do realize that verbalized words are sounds, don't you? I was asking you whether "baby" and "fetus" have semiotic content, or are merely meaningless sounds (like a grunt).

In response, you have given what I take to be your definition of the words.

21 hours ago, Guest London jwaan said:

A baby is a person and a foetus is not. It's a scientific definition.

Is it really, now? In what medical school or premed, nursing school, or biology course is a baby defined as "a person"? That's a scientific definition?

I'd like to know exactly how you mean your definition. Do you mean to say that that all non-persons are fetuses? So your dog is a fetus?

How does your statement that "a baby is a person" clarify the debate?

Why don't you try again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest London jwaan
8 hours ago, BhForce said:

Frustration in being able to explain a matter to someone else is generally correlated with fuzzy thinking.

You do realize that verbalized words are sounds, don't you? I was asking you whether "baby" and "fetus" have semiotic content, or are merely meaningless sounds (like a grunt).

In response, you have given what I take to be your definition of the words.

Is it really, now? In what medical school or premed, nursing school, or biology course is a baby defined as "a person"? That's a scientific definition?

I'd like to know exactly how you mean your definition. Do you mean to say that that all non-persons are fetuses? So your dog is a fetus?

How does your statement that "a baby is a person" clarify the debate?

Why don't you try again?

Bhforce,

I think you are lacking any type of intellectual capability whatsoever. Indeed, I think you are talking right out of your jagsaw......

Semiotic sounds?? One is a foetus, the other is a baby that has been born. That is not my definition, that is what these terms mean. What in the hell are you talking about grunts and meaningless sounds?? I'm afraid that had the stupidest response I have ever heard to qualify an opposite view to anything......

And as for your other bizarre quip, about your dog being a foetus, next to jkvs typical medical diagnoses, that really is the dumbest think I have heard for a long time. So congratulations for that.  If I were to say bhforce was a <banned word filter activated>, does it follow that every <banned word filter activated> is called bhforce???

And for the avoidance of doubt, I'm still waiting to hear about aborting pregnancy from rape, and we are on the edge of our seats here waiting for you to tell us more about the limbs being ripped off with forceps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest London jwaan
On 1/28/2019 at 11:01 PM, BhForce said:

Do the words have fixed meanings? Or are they merely meaningless sounds? If the latter, no further discussion is warranted.

Do words have "fixed meanings"? In fact, are we really here or is all just an illusion? 

And more to the point, are you capable of actually understanding anything factual or do you think you are contributing to this e-forum by metaphorically doing an e-lindee on it as above?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh
12 hours ago, Guest London jwaan said:

Bhforce,

I think you are lacking any type of intellectual capability whatsoever. Indeed, I think you are talking right out of your jagsaw......

Semiotic sounds?? One is a foetus, the other is a baby that has been born. That is not my definition, that is what these terms mean. What in the hell are you talking about grunts and meaningless sounds?? I'm afraid that had the stupidest response I have ever heard to qualify an opposite view to anything......

And as for your other bizarre quip, about your dog being a foetus, next to jkvs typical medical diagnoses, that really is the dumbest think I have heard for a long time. So congratulations for that.  If I were to say bhforce was a <banned word filter activated>, does it follow that every <banned word filter activated> is called bhforce???

And for the avoidance of doubt, I'm still waiting to hear about aborting pregnancy from rape, and we are on the edge of our seats here waiting for you to tell us more about the limbs being ripped off with forceps. 

You, London Jawan, are exactly like a teenage boy upset and unable to deal with his acne. BHS's arguments may be wrong but unlike you he is at least intellectually mature enough to be able to express his points with resorting to abuse. I don't think this forum has ever experienced someone as immature and pathetic as yourself....someone who is just so lacking in any mental ability to express points without resorting to teenage level vileness. Very sad that anyone in our community could be so intellectually backward.☹️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2019 at 4:30 PM, Guest Thought said:

Well from my life all I can say is please do not think of Abortion because if you decide to keep the baby you will not be able to love that child. You will put the child in life time misery. I am one of them and I could never swallow that the mother and the father are my true parents.  You will feel you are not from this world. The fetus knows everything around the surroundings. The child will not be able to learn why they are acting this way. I found out and it made lots of sense why I used to say I was not born through a mother even when I 5 years old. I do not have left the family because I feel I am not supposed to be here in this world. 

Either the parents should decide to abort or not even think about ending a fetus life. I came to learn it was because I was a very active fetus and the mother did not like me for that.

the fact you are alive is proof positive you are wanted and needed in this world , don't make a couple of folks the basis of judging your status here. Waheguru ji is with you always wills you to live; make your life a sign of positivity . I'm sorry your mother was incapable of putting her ego aside to give you tha support you needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest London jwaan
12 hours ago, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

You, London Jawan, are exactly like a teenage boy upset and unable to deal with his acne. BHS's arguments may be wrong but unlike you he is at least intellectually mature enough to be able to express his points with resorting to abuse. I don't think this forum has ever experienced someone as immature and pathetic as yourself....someone who is just so lacking in any mental ability to express points without resorting to teenage level vileness. Very sad that anyone in our community could be so intellectually backward.☹️

A pathetic jibe jagsaw......

And you? Possibly the most idiotic person to have graced the Internet. Openly lies, use fake statistics to make a point, try to create caste hatred, pro Islam, show extremist views but want other people to do your extremism for you?? In fact, you have been banned lol. And then go into a sulk when I tear you a new one with facts......and for the avoidance of doubt, I shall continue to do so.

Bhforce is talking out of his jagsaw. And like when you spout diahorrea, im trying to give him some e-immodium

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest London jwaan
On 1/28/2019 at 11:01 PM, BhForce said:

Your fear is merely of words, not a deadly weapon

I can safely say, I'm not afraid of your words, nor of any other person on this forum. There are a few balanced views on here, some extremists, and the downright behvkoof.

It is heavily skewed to the latter. And that in itself is a downright reality of why the kaum is becoming an irrelevant minority on the world stage with no voice, importance, and whose opinions carry no weight.

But fear you? I certainly do not. I laugh at you. And I laugh loud at the other behvkoofs lack of intelligence. On the contrary I find your stupidity entertaining. Like the scarecrow in wizard of oz. If I only had a brain la la la.

But no, fear you I do not. If you were in front of me I would knock you behvkoofs straight out and would consider it my duty as a righteous sikh to do so.

Waheguru JI ka Khalsa. Waheguru JI ki fateh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use