Jump to content

Is it better to join the Army or Armed Police?


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, californiasardar1 said:

Why do you want to put your life on the line defending corrupt governments/systems?

What if you was attacked by a gun man who was committing a crime. Would you refuse the help of the original poster as you believe they are representing a corrupt government?

Most likely you would sh1t your pants and hope the original poster came to your aid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Big_Tera said:

What if you was attacked by a gun man who was committing a crime. Would you refuse the help of the original poster as you believe they are representing a corrupt government?

Most likely you would sh1t your pants and hope the original poster came to your aid. 

 

Where in my post did I say anything about individual police officers?

 

All I am saying is that there is a better way of making a living than putting your life on the line for (in many instances) morally ambiguous reasons.  This is more true of the military than the police.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, californiasardar1 said:

 

Where in my post did I say anything about individual police officers?

 

All I am saying is that there is a better way of making a living than putting your life on the line for (in many instances) morally ambiguous reasons.  This is more true of the military than the police.

You clearly said, "why would you put your life on the line for corrupt governments" Which essentially means you would not do the job of being and armed police officer. You are basically discouraging him from doing the honorable and brave job of protecting the public crime. 

Your obviously to sh1t scared to to the job yourself. Then why interfere with someone that has got the ballz to do it. 

Get back to hiding under your bed next time you hear a loud noise and let the real men do what they can to protect your sorry good for nothing a$$. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

You clearly said why would you put your life on the line for corrupt governments. Which essentially means why would you do the job of being and armed police officer. You are basically discovering him from doing the honorable and brave job of protecting the public crime. 

Your obviously to sh1t scared to to the job yourself. Then why interfere with someone that has got the ballz to do it. 

Get back to hiding under your bed next time you hear a loud noise and let the real men do what they can to protect your sorry good for nothing a$$. 

 

 

Before you go around insulting others, you should learn how to write properly.

Anyway, you are obviously hot-headed and immature.  And I am not impressed by your bravado.  Calm down a little bit and think about the situation carefully.  There is a difference between doing honorable work protecting those who need it and getting mixed up in a world filled with moral ambiguity where you may be doing (or be asked to do) a lot of harm (in addition to putting your life on the line).  My grandfather was a police officer, and things aren't as simple as you try to make them out to be.

I am "interfering" with my advice because I'm not a teenager who thinks that everything in life is about having the "ballz" to do something or not.  What is the point of potentially dying over something stupid? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, californiasardar1 said:

 

Before you go around insulting others, you should learn how to write properly.

Anyway, you are obviously hot-headed and immature.  And I am not impressed by your bravado.  Calm down a little bit and think about the situation carefully.  There is a difference between doing honorable work protecting those who need it and getting mixed up in a world filled with moral ambiguity where you may be doing a lot of harm (in addition to putting your life on the line).

I am "interfering" with my advice because I'm not a teenager who thinks that everything in life is about having the "ballz" to do something or not.  What is the point of potentially dying over something stupid? 

I am not going to engage with you anymore as you fail to see the point. Our gurus told us to be honorable and respectful and uphold the law. 

Armed police do a great job of protecting the public from gun crime. People with guns who go around firing at innocent people. You think it is not right to take one of these guys out who want to injure and endanger innocent people. Or you think its too dangerous job. I will have you know that Sikhs fought in wars just so you can have a right to live. 

Go backing to pushing your pencils and writing letters and let the real men do their job to protect your sissy a$$ from harm you ungrateful snowflake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use