Jump to content

UK Sikhs giving their children western names


ChardikalaUK
 Share

Recommended Posts

The western naming is part of a larger scheme of thinking that somehow this will provide social mobility which means it will somehow propel you into higher white society.

This mentality relates to social standing, schooling, profession, or moving into a posher area. 

The reality is the whites don't give a stuff what you call your kids. 

Here is the kicker, the whites are more likely to accept you as you are with your heritage and your traditional names.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The western naming is part of a larger scheme of thinking that somehow this will provide social mobility which means it will somehow propel you into higher white society.

This mentality relates to social standing, schooling, profession, or moving into a posher area. 

The reality is the whites don't give a stuff what you call your kids. 

Here is the kicker, the whites are more likely to accept you as you are with your heritage and your traditional names.

 

The Chancellor is called Rishi Sunak, the secretary of state is Priti Patel.

Their names clearly did not hold them back.

We've already achieved so much in this country.

Also we're not white like the Ashkenazi jews who often give themselves English names to blend into Anglo society. We will always stick out, whether we are called Jaspreet or James.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ChardikalaUK said:

The Chancellor is called Rishi Sunak, the secretary of state is Priti Patel.

Their names clearly did not hold them back.

We've already achieved so much in this country.

Also we're not white like the Ashkenazi jews who often give themselves English names to blend into Anglo society. We will always stick out, whether we are called Jaspreet or James.

Yup even the lightest of our kind is not gora colour, its more light weatish colour

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ChardikalaUK said:

The Chancellor is called Rishi Sunak, the secretary of state is Priti Patel.

Their names clearly did not hold them back.

We've already achieved so much in this country.

Also we're not white like the Ashkenazi jews who often give themselves English names to blend into Anglo society. We will always stick out, whether we are called Jaspreet or James.

And here's the thing, there is nothing wrong in sticking out. 

In the current climate with diversity, it's a plus point. 

Even the Ashkenazis have a few tell tale signs, if you know what to look for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we compare the Carribean blacks and African blacks I would say that the whites mingle more with the Carribeans as they have English names and a culture which is slightly more similar to themselves.

However the Africans are more successful academically and economically. 

So if you want your kid to have a gora/gori partner then go for a western name but it won't do much for their career.

In fact goreh might ask your kid 'is that your real name?' And they will never be able to escape the classic question- 'where are you really from?'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ChardikalaUK said:

If we compare the Carribean blacks and African blacks I would say that the whites mingle more with the Carribeans as they have English names and a culture which is slightly more similar to themselves.

However the Africans are more successful academically and economically. 

So if you want your kid to have a gora/gori partner then go for a western name but it won't do much for their career.

In fact goreh might ask your kid 'is that your real name?' And they will never be able to escape the classic question- 'where are you really from?'

You know what the biggest difference between Afro-Carribean and Black Africans?

The Africans don't allow colonial baggage to stifle them.

If you see the Africans in acting roles (their traditional African names) aren't stifling them like Idris Elba. To get into acting roles, you are mixing with Luvvies who are tending to be upper classes.

Even the profression of Rugby which is seen as a middle class sport has quite a lot of Black African players with African names. 

To the gorah, if you have an Anglicised name, they are asking the question "what are you hiding?".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason Africans do better is because most of them (particularly those from West Africa) came here as professionals with degrees whereas the ones from the Caribbean obviously didn't. The Afro Caribbeans have assimilated into western/white working class culture (and with that comes poor academic attainment and low social mobility).The other reason is those form the Caribbean have an individualist culture (Like White Brits) whilst Africans have more of a collectivist one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, learningkaur said:

‘Ciaras’ parents most likely weren't brought up in proper Sikhi, more Punjabi culture.

There are actually not as many people taking a letter to name their child any more- this is mostly because new parents now haven’t ever been educated with a reason as to why to do that.
 

 

Not really tbh

I wasn't raised as a Sikh either, all i knew was the mool mantar that Guru Nanak Dev ji is our 1st guru and that Guru Gobind Singh ji is our 10th guru. As i kid i used go Gurdwara every Sunday but stopped going when i was a teenager, and that was it!  So i wasn't raised as a Sikh.

But i still knew basic stuff like when you have a baby you are supposed to go Gurdwara and do hukkam for a letter and when the baby is born you first take it Gurdwara from the hospital and then take it home. Thats basic stuff!  Even my cousins who dance around with pints on your heads know this stuff.

And most new parents are in their 30s, so kind of surprising that they don't know these basic things. But then again they probably know them but just prefer not to because they prefer raising their kids less traditionally and more westernized ...  

But maybe it just depends on the families .... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Whitewashed Punjabis, especially the ones in Asian areas, you can easily tell them apart. Its hard to explain but its the body language, the nuance, which give it away. You don't even need to hear them talk, you can just tell. Its hard to explain lol 

A lot of Whitewashed Punjabis also love to laugh at Indian culture and make curry jokes with their White mates. Back when i used to use trains/public transport i used to notice this quite a bit especially the office boys. 

Its these same people that give their kids White names. 

Anyway, its up to them at the end of the day, maybe they have chosen not to raise their kids in Sikh culture and have actually decided to raise them with White culture, in that case you can't really question their decision to give their kids White names 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Niara said:

The reason Africans do better is because most of them (particularly those from West Africa) came here as professionals with degrees whereas the ones from the Caribbean obviously didn't. The Afro Caribbeans have assimilated into western/white working class culture (and with that comes poor academic attainment and low social mobility).The other reason is those form the Caribbean have an individualist culture (Like White Brits) whilst Africans have more of a collectivist one

Yes so them having English names did not help them. There are more important things such as education.

Barack Obama managed to become President with a very African sounding name.

He achieved more than Colin Powell, Jesse Jackson and Condoleeza Rice.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So, are you saying Guru ji isn't God? Or are you saying the British encouraged this belief?
    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use