Jump to content

Maharani Jind Kaur plaque


puzzled
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, puzzled said:

@intrigued it was a while back but i remember reading that the essay was dated a few days after his meeting with Bhai Randhir Singh ji.

So maybe he changed his mind again? Idnno ... 

But he definitely is growing a joora in that last photo taken of him in prison. 

Yh I heard that the granthi saw that he kept his vaal long when he died...think it was 6 months after meeting Bhai Sahib Bhai Randhir Singh

Found an old thread on it: 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, intrigued said:

Yh I heard that the granthi saw that he kept his vaal long when he died...think it was 6 months after meeting Bhai Sahib Bhai Randhir Singh

Found an old thread on it: 

 

So Bhai Sahib met him on 4th October, but there are different dates for when Bhagat Singh wrote the essay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, KingTarunjot said:

She tried to save the sikh raj but it was too little too late. If only sardar sham singh attariwala knew about the gaddari by jammu hindu dogras and other sikh generals we could have kicked british out of india 200 years ago and established sikh raj as far out as our armies could travel. All of hind would be under khalsa raj and maybe even the whole world....

 

Sham Singh Attariwala's most visible direct descendant is a "secular," liquor-drinking Indian government lapdog who takes every opportunity he can to remind people of his military title (which he no doubt garnered by a being a lapdog) and the fact that he is Sham Singh Attariwala's descendant. His son is clean-shaven and is married to a Bollywood actress/politician (who also comes from a pathetic "Sikh" military family) who takes every opportunity she can to go on twitter and call Sant Ji a terrorist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, puzzled said:

So Bhai Sahib met him on 4th October, but there are different dates for when Bhagat Singh wrote the essay. 

Yh but on the other side he kept his kesh when he died so its kinda interesting to see the contradiction lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, intrigued said:

Yh but on the other side he kept his kesh when he died so its kinda interesting to see the contradiction lol

Unless he had written the essay before his meeting but the British decided to publish it afterwards, to make it look like he died an atheist so Sikhs won't be inspired by him, it's the kind of thing the British would have done. 

 

Because he definitely has a joora in the last photo taken.Bhagat-Singh-in-Jail.jpg.f87533f3ad581cf8ff4a796f80e05bd6.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KingTarunjot said:

rest of Sant ji's family all came out as gadars so what does that mean?

Family members of guru's came out gadars  and anti-sikh so does that mean they are as well?

Sham singh was last military stand against imperial british and lost solely because of gadari

read a really good book on him, il see if i can find it

Fair enough.

But I want to point out that Ranjit Singh's empire was not a "Sikh Raj". A "Sikh Raj" would not be an empire with a monarch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Unless he had written the essay before his meeting but the British decided to publish it afterwards, to make it look like he died an atheist so Sikhs won't be inspired by him, it's the kind of thing the British would have done.

Yh that sounds like something the British would do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Whatever problems the Afghan Sikhs have or Punjabi Sikhs have, it's much better to support them than the Muslims.
    • So, are you saying Guru ji isn't God? Or are you saying the British encouraged this belief?
    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use