Jump to content

Chaupa Singh rahit: Sikh from a bad background and an unruly selfish Sikh


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Objectively, it's fascinating reading, lol. Honestly, I do enjoy reading it. But to sincerely follow its edicts to the letter? Nah, it ain't kosher in my opinion.

Let me ask you another question:

Would you have liked it better if all extant puraatan texts like rahits were in full consonance with each other, in terms of post-annexation influenced thinking?

Is it even possible (let alone advisable!) for any evolved, literate culture to ever even have this level of homogeny? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

Objectively, it's fascinating reading, lol. Honestly, I do enjoy reading it. But to sincerely follow its edicts to the letter? Nah, it ain't kosher in my opinion.

You looking for some Sikh equivalent to 10 commandments bro? Our thing can't be broken down as simply as this! Check out Akaal Ustaat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

Let me ask you another question:

Would you have liked it better if all extant puraatan texts like rahits were in full consonance with each other, in terms of post-annexation influenced thinking?

Is it even possible (let alone advisable!) for any evolved, literate culture to ever even have this level of homogeny? 

I wouldn't 'prefer' anything. I'm saying it contradicts the fundamentals of what gianis on stages around the world say our religion is about. I just want to know who's wrong: the mainstream orthodoxy or Chaupa Singh. 

Also, it's interesting how you rail against corrosive Anglo attempts at bastardising Sikhi either to promote colonial adherence or prioritise jatt prominence, but when something that undermines the underlying premise of the religion we follow is supposedly a thing of beauty and nuance worthy of further introspection! What?!? Absolute kekery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

I wouldn't 'prefer' anything. I'm saying it contradicts the fundamentals of what gianis on stages around the world say our religion is about. I just want to know who's wrong: the mainstream orthodoxy or Chaupa Singh. 

 

That whole concept of mainstream religious orthodoxy seems like a modern construct. Hammering dharam into religion. I just think it especially appeals to people who think in binary form, and seeing how rurals seem to either go to one extreme or the other i.e. super orthodoxy that is running towards Bhasauria mindsets, or outright amorphous pendu folk superstition, I understand why some thought they needed to be contained by simplistic concept of orthodoxy.  

I already said, the proBahmunh bits (which are small and easily detectable), are obviously the result of a fear of changing fortunes. They are actually contradicted by a lot of what else is contained therin. So they could be interpolations, or more likely just kneej erk statements that are easily identifiable and not in concert with the rest of the manuscript. 

If you think people take old rahits and try and follow them 'religiously' - well I've never met anyone doing so. Instead today they are more like historical curiosities for most. Or a window into our past.

 

Quote

Also, it's interesting how you rail against corrosive Anglo attempts at bastardising Sikhi either to promote colonial adherence or prioritise jatt prominence, but when something that undermines the underlying premise of the religion we follow is supposedly a thing of beauty and nuance worthy of further introspection! What?!? Absolute kekery.

Well firstly I don't think it's a religion, and secondly, that Bahmunh stuff has long been fully contained in the panth, but that can't be said about jut stupidity, which was obviously promoted because it made the panth easier to control by colonialists.  The former has long since passed to be a threat, the latter continues to drag us down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 I just want to know who's wrong: the mainstream orthodoxy or Chaupa Singh. 

Take out the couple of blatantly pro-baahmunh things out of the Chaupa Singh rahit and I think you've got a more accurate representation of original Singhs and their culture compared to what a modern day giani would tell you - in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Take out the couple of blatantly pro-baahmunh things out of the Chaupa Singh rahit and I think you've got a more accurate representation of original Singhs and their culture compared to what a modern day giani would tell you - in my opinion. 

In that case today's gianis are bang out of order. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

In that case today's gianis are bang out of order. 

They are just products of their time. Do you ever hear any telling the sangat about panj hathiars that keep coming up in puraatan sources? How much studying do the sangats that they cater to, involve themselves in?

You know we had over a century of colonial subjugation that could not co-exist with real militant, weaponised Sikhi. 

We're just waking up to that. Gianis (from what I've seen) are usually scared they'll lose their position in a Gurdwara. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

I assume you've read the rehatnama? It seems to have an uncomfortable heavy bias in favour of Brahmin culture and those who originate from Brahmin backgrounds.

It's one thing for village nobodies to self-aggrandise themselves and their particular castes and backgrounds for secular advancement and perks, but for an author to emerge and claim his work is a divinely inspired order when it repeatedly contradicts the fundamental values of the religion he supposedly belongs to is taking the pi55.

Chaupa Singh's origins was surprise surprise  brahmin ...and he was often corrected by Guru ji for his bias , my guess is he took advantadge of his position of hazoori sikh  to 'add' later his own thoughts about brahmins sikhs to the rehitnama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is nothing wrong with starched pagg. The Guru is omniscient (all-knowing). You think he doesn't know our intentions? If somebody wears a starched pagg but still respects it as a crown then whats wrong with that? People think that starch automatically makes people lose their respect for their pagg but thats just false.  And dont make this a caste thing I’m Rajput Jatt sikh (not an ounce of Tarkhan or anything else) and we all starch our INDIAN style punjabi paggs (patiala shahi), but respect them as our crowns and our literal lives. A respected starch pagg is better by far than a freshly tied one which people just disrespect. And people forget that these are not ready made or pre-tied turbans. You still tie them initially but just of course not as frequently. What’s wrong with that?  When your relationship is that strong with the Guru then you know what he means. Speak to him directly, explain why and ask him if it’s okay. Btw I know people who dont starch their turbans (all punjabi/morni style btw) and they just wear it again the next day without tying it if they have toed it really nicely the day before. 😂 You cant really even tell who had tied it and who just wore it again without starch. At least we’re open about it. Bhul chuk maaf    
    • Its called a “fifty” becuase when Singhs were fighting in the British army, they would recieve an 8 metre pagg, with a cour four base, because the base layer was half (50%) of the main turban, it’s called a fifty. The practise of tying a keski under your main one is now seen as pretty weird (except for a patka), but the small coloured strip inder the pagg is still used as a fashion statement since its pretty visually appealing. And so, people now just tie a small little “kung-fu strip” sort of thing under their pagg to imitate that effect.
    • Found how to do it. For anybody else wondering, heres how. No one even helped me btw. So much for Guru Ji’s lhalsa always ready to help (and having their Singhs’ backs smh). (Notes: Aim to do this on a hot summer’s day, and dedicate a full day to this, since you only have to do this once every 4 months at least (normally the turban will stay in shape until you wish to untie it and physically pull it open again). This helps it to dry faster, since you have to starch it, HALF DRY IT, pooni it, tie it and then wear it for around four hours for the rest of it to dry, all in the same day. It’s a one day process but it serves you for months). This works for both the UK/Kenyan style (starch is best for this style) as well as the normal Punjabi paghs (such as Patiala shahi, wattan wali and morni paghs). Not sure about dumallas though. Probably not . Pagg Starch: 1) Boil 6 cups of water in a saucepan on low heat (always low heat) 2) Seperately dissolve 4 tablespoons of maida (all purpose flower) with a little water until it is 100% smooth.  You could also use rice or corn starch. Add more water if it is not a smooth liquid 3) Once completely smooth, pour this mixture through a strainer (to make it even smoother) into the boiling water. 4) Now continuously stir it until it goes completely see through. Keep on stirring it on the low heat until it goes totally transparent (it can take a little while to cook, but the pagg will last you for months!) It will at become a thick paste first, but keep stirring until it becomes see through and thinner.    5) Once it’s transparent, pour the starch (again through a strainer) into a big enough, clean bucket to cool down. 6) Once cool, take a clean, dry turban and completely and mix it in with the starch for around 5 minutes. Make sure that it is all evenly and completely soaked and wet with the starch. (Most people use mal-mal material, but I use full voile and I have used Rubia too. They’re all fine. Maybe use Rubin for smaller turbans and mal mal for larger ones) 7) Leave it out in the sun to HALF DRY ONLY!!!!!!! (Don’t ever let your starched turban fully dry before you tie it. If you do, then you will have to spray/ sprinkle water on it which will weaken the starch and ruin the turban) ONLY HALF DRY THE TURBAN IN THE SUN!!! 😎 Once HALF DRY ONLY take the now semi damp turban, and fold/pooni and then tie it like normal (straight on your head, with no base layer such as a Keski or patka underneath). Leave it on your head for around 4 hours just to fully dry and it will be ready and set for months now. Like I said, do try to tie your dastar every day, but if you can’t or really don’t want to, I hope this helps! Like I said this works on both the traditional Punjabi/Indian style paggs, and the more recent UK/Kenyan style paggs. It does for my morni pagg, but the first larr slips up in to the pagg. This is normal dw. Wjkk, Wjkf
    • I guess easier ways of learning have taken precedence. There are so many Youtube channels and podcasts available that people are more ready to listen for knowledge at their own leisure. There are so many great kathas available online that take months to listen, so that people may not really get the time to come here and write.
    • *Bump The current conflict (w/ Iran getting involved) is being orchestrated by a 3rd party in my opinion. We all are going to blame the Jewish community (how they run the banks, how they are brutal and etc.) but they have a point in this conflict.  As soon as people start finding about the truth that's when the real movement will begin. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use