Jump to content

Why every sikh shud be environmentalist!


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, shastarSingh said:

We hv one last chance.

The world needs to do 3 things.

Accept Guru Nanak Dev dev ji as Satguru and take Naam from punj pyare.

Reduce world population.

Make eco villages and live green lifestyle even in cities.

Sorry one more thing.

Humans shud totally reject tobacco.

When I was in Delhi, I could feel tobacco while breathing air.

All the fake babaas and bhainchods like ram rahim, ashutosh, radhasoamis tell their chellaas to give up alcohol but not tambakku.

Alcohol is not bajjar kurehit but still it shud be avoided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

.

All the fake babaas and bhainchods like ram rahim, ashutosh, radhasoamis tell their chellaas to give up alcohol but not tambakku.

 

Why don't they tell them to give up Tobacco ?

Most people I think are aware of the need to protect environment, but moving away from living 'modern' life is quite a big commitment for most people. 

I agree with what you said somewhere about plastic. 

I think natural disasters will be Nature's way of protesting (as I have heard in Katha)

 

@shastarSingh Panjabis are terrible from what I have seen with regards to overusing cars. My uncle in Jalandhar would not walk 10 minutes from his house to his workplace because walking is not seen as something 'wealthy' people do in the city ? And the area was reasonable/not dirty

23 minutes ago, proudkaur21 said:

d.ou see people who don't believe in Karam like these abrahamics it is very easy for them to be selfish and do things that better their own interests at the cost of others. But we forgot that. We have done so much paap by destroying the rivers, cutting down the forests , industrializing the meat industry and causing so much terror to innocent animals. The fact that people think all this will not come back to bite them? 

I think 'Dharmis' in India are exactly the same if  not worse, if they are maya/business-minded

 

Does anyone else think that the pressure from Western countries towards India and China to reduce pollution is hypocritical and with an agenda to stop India and China's economic progress ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Why don't they tell them to give up Tobacco ?

Most people I think are aware of the need to protect environment, but moving away from living 'modern' life is quite a big commitment for most people. 

I agree with what you said somewhere about plastic. 

I think natural disasters will be Nature's way of protesting (as I have heard in Katha)

 

@shastarSingh Panjabis are terrible from what I have seen with regards to overusing cars. My uncle in Jalandhar would not walk 10 minutes from his house to his workplace because walking is not seen as something 'wealthy' people do in the city ? And the area was reasonable/not dirty

I think 'Dharmis' in India are exactly the same if  not worse, if they are maya/business-minded

 

Does anyone else think that the pressure from Western countries towards India and China to reduce pollution is hypocritical and with an agenda to stop India and China's economic progress ?

It is hypocritical.

The world wants to buy cheap things made via Chinese labour and then do drama that China is doing pollution.

All the politicians, media etc. Are bhainchods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Why don't they tell them to give up Tobacco ?

Most people I think are aware of the need to protect environment, but moving away from living 'modern' life is quite a big commitment for most people. 

I agree with what you said somewhere about plastic. 

I think natural disasters will be Nature's way of protesting (as I have heard in Katha)

 

@shastarSingh Panjabis are terrible from what I have seen with regards to overusing cars. My uncle in Jalandhar would not walk 10 minutes from his house to his workplace because walking is not seen as something 'wealthy' people do in the city ? And the area was reasonable/not dirty

I think 'Dharmis' in India are exactly the same if  not worse, if they are maya/business-minded

 

Does anyone else think that the pressure from Western countries towards India and China to reduce pollution is hypocritical and with an agenda to stop India and China's economic progress ?

These western countries get their textiles made in third world countries so as to not pollute their own environment and also sell the products at way higher prices while making the poor people work in sweatshops. They are all only for money but in order to reduce pollution in their own countries sent manufacturing to 3rd world countries. People think colonialism is over.  Look at these places like LA and all and how much waste they must produce everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

It is hypocritical.

The world wants to buy cheap things made via Chinese labour and then do drama that China is doing pollution.

All the politicians, media etc. Are bhainchods.

facts. They want cheap products made in China and then sell it for way higher prices to make profit and also reduce pollution in their own countries but then do drama of being all for the environment. Buying the latest phone is their priority even if the old one works fine. These so called environment activists living in LA drinking fresh green juice out of plastic cups and talking about saving animals and planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use