Jump to content

Going out when engaged


*S I |\| G H*
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sat Shri Akal Virji

Hmm... I would suggest that it's rather important to get to know phanji a bit more. It shouldn't even stop u if ur Amritdhari... Right?

In some situations parents don't want their kids to get to know each other before marriage... I would just suggest them to meet each other secretly, though to a limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously it's not the best to do. But Virji, I feel that it's important to get to know a little about ur lifepartner before going one step ahead, ie. marriage. I hope u agree with me. Regardless, many parents are still stopping their kids to meet each other privately. The society's thoughts just can't die out by accepting them... u have to be the change to see the change! They can either accept or reject it. If they reject it u can just go out infront of them and create problems at home or u can go out unknowingly (im not telling u to lie, but just trying to ignore to tell it). Sometimes it's just good not to let ur parents know everything you do. Of course, that's up to the individual her/himself... it's a matter of prioritizing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"dating" even in such a circumstance is still somewhat shady. Even then, it is not 100% that you will be married, and also, its just not appropriate for gursikhs.

an alternative is to spend time together with your families etc..

I am not saying dont get to know each other, but just dont act as if you are already married.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume that many ppl get engaged coz they definately will get married. Hope that we all have that much buddhi to judge that ourselves... it takes a lot to go there. Of course, getting to know each other dosn't allow u to act as an already married pair... there should be some distance! Talk with the eyes, not with the hands! blush.gif

However, I cannot exclude that it can happen. And if it won't work... then Virji let's just say that u didn't read my post. shhh.gif But it's just a matter of finding a balance rite... what ur conscience tells u to do and how far u can go if u can judge that there is something speciel!

Mkhalsa virji... why isn't it appropriate for GurSikh's? Of course we have 2 different oppinions but maybe I could learn something from you... if it's persuasive enough:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is another alternative, instead of going out alone , why not take some cousins and friends with you. Do something as a group rather than just date type thing.

Engagement doesnt always end up in marriage so you have to make sure things dont happen that will make things difficult if the mariage doesnt take place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that there's a think in your previous posts that I could possibly agree with, barring the know people before marriage. What you're suggesting is that it's alright to lie to your parents, that you can go out and about sneaking, and that the old society's ways should be changed. I don't agree with any of that. It's ridiculous to keep secrets like that from your parents, and it shouldn't be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

perhaps our parents should just know everything about us..... after all, no matter how much we front it, we're not perfect.... perhaps we should tell our parents things that they will, in fact, be disappointed with..... after all, they should know everything..... we should tell our parents every single time we've ever lied to them (even if it was a small one).... we should tell them (if they're not rehitdhari) that they're just wrong, and stupid, and should be better sikhs..... what other things can we tell our parents! :TH: :TH: :TH: :TH:

after all, i guess i'm the king of sarcasm on this board... what i'm trying to say is let's say that me and whatever singhnee decides to get married.... i dunno, maybe i'm the only "messed up" one out there, but if i go with a group of people to meet my future wife, and we wanna have a heart to heart (or is that word not allowed... i mean, gain a serious understanding about this person....perhaps a "mind to mind"?), things are most probbaly going to be said that either me or this hy

pothetical singhnee haven't told many, if any, other people..... that's the trust i'd hope exists between husband and wife (or even "future husband" and "future wife)....

and now the obvious question will arise (forgive me for assuming, but i'm sure this would come from either smartsingh or mkhalsa)

"why not just wait till after marriage to "understand" your spouse"

well, cuz straight up, what if it's too late? let's take the hypothesis that mkhalsa laid out that engagement really means nothing till you're married...what you're essentially saying is that if there's something about your "fiance" (the term used lightly in this scenario) that you're totally disgusted with, and that you feel is a severe obstruction on your path with him/her....isn't it better to say no BEFORE you've made that trip around Guruji 4 fateful times? or perhaps we should jus wait till after the couple's promise made to guruji before we break it?

do you see where i'm heading with this? all in all, i think, especially in the case of arranged marriages, if you're not gonna get to know your wife before getting married, then why even stop calling her bhanji, right? it's all the same if you're jus gonna walk into it blind like that....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah sure why not?? at last they gonna be together forever.. Parents aren't gonna make decision for YOU the whole life. Their job/sewa is to teach you good teachings till you hit mature age which normally is after college or around 21yrs old. If parents taught person nice, then basically the kids will know what to do and what NOT TO DO before marriage.

As balait said.. It doesn't have to be all alone moment !! go along with friends, cuzins and so on..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use