Jump to content

Radhasoami Beas Biggest Secret 2005.


Mahavir
 Share

Recommended Posts

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh.

To all my brothers and sisters out there, we all know that Radhasoami exists. Sikhs in this very modern time do tend to follow their beliefs, and still class themselves as sikhs. This email is not a hatred email, nor supportive, this email is here to open the eyes of sikhs out there. Recent studies and investigations show that Radhasoami are aiming to take over sikhi by conversion. They are now making sure that sikhs that do attend their weekly dereh to take naam. Naam is an official baptism process, where an indvidual says five words: "onkaar, satnam, jhot-nirankaar, surang, noraag" and are there on classed as a Radhasoami. The head of each dereh all around the UK, Canada, and America have made formal decisions that the year 2005 is the year where all sikhs will be converted to Radhasoami. The following are questions to raise the Radhasoami masters, and believers, if their religion is such of purity, why are they repeating the same actions of the mughals? But without physical power, only mental power? Why do they take out passages from our Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, and yet do not believe in it? Why do they only believe in our first five guru's, and not the following five? After all the ghatee of Guru Nanak Dev Ji was passed down ten times after wasnt it? Why did Gurbachan Singh, a former guru of Radhasoami, wear a kara? have 'Singh' in his name? Have a kess? Give the impression that he is apart of the khalsa-panth, which was created by Guru Gobind Singh Ji in 1699, whom of which they do not believe in...? Why was Jaimal thrown out of the satsangs of Sal

ig Ram and Misra, why did they try to convert everyone in those locations to RS beliefs? Who actually wrote the letters attributed to Jaimal in Beas books? Who killed Path of the Masters author Julian Johnson at the Dera? Why did Jagat's wife attempt suicide off a tower at Beas, and his son actually succeed? Read the first hand account of a rep whom smuggled goods into India for Charan at the risk of going to jail. Did you know Swami was not the founder of Radhasoami undermined faith? According to Faqir Chand, whom Sawan endorsed as an RS master and gave permission to change the teachings, modern day Radhasoami masters have no power, do not project their radiant forms, do not come for the disciple at death, do not take the disciple’s karma and do not even know what happens after death. Did you know RS initiation is almost identical to Yogananda’s group and it is kundalini yoga? Did you know Darshan stood before a crowd and proclaimed he was not the successor to Kirpal? Read Sawan's registered wills and find out what ordinary seva job he allocated to Kirpal at the Dera after his death. Did you know many RS “guru’s” may be millionaires claiming to live off their own earnings and will not provide financial statements to the public for their non profit organizations nor disclose the salaries they receive?

Gurfateh Ji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

www.nirankari.org

- check out some old photos of their ex-Guru - late Gurbachana

.. there are photos of ministers, the president of india, and the prime-minister of india paying respect and offering support to this Pakandi Baba and his Nirankari Cult

Radha Soami similarly - loads of MLAs, politicians and high ranking Indian Govt. officials show support by going to Satsangs, paying respects and given money donation or asking for blessings.

wot more do u need to show that u r supporting them (directly or indirectly)???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use