Jump to content

Dr. Sukhpreet Singh Udoke On Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Ji


Mehtab Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

He is caught here on his word. He is the one who creates doubt about dasam bani. How he is trying

to dodge the question.

He has not understood this line at all. If one reads this part of bachitra natak, one concludes

that this line does not eulogise caste but says that caste is of no significance and God remmeberance is

supreme act.

This is what happens when such dummies who can chirp lfast are given an undue importance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In sri Guru Granth sahib we read

ਮਰਦਾਸ ਭਲੇ ਕਉ ਦੀਆ ॥

अमरदास भले कउ दीआ ॥

Amarḏās bẖale ka▫o ḏī▫ā.

which He passed on to Guru Amar Daas, of the Bhalla dynasty.

ਤਿਨਿ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਦਾਸੁ ਸੋਢੀ ਥਿਰੁ ਥਪ੍ਯ੍ਯਉ ॥

तिनि स्री रामदासु सोढी थिरु थप्यउ ॥

Ŧin sarī Rāmḏās sodẖī thir thap▫ya▫o.

Then, He firmly established the Great Raam Daas of the Sodhi dynasty.

ang 1401

Now dynasty of two Guru sahibans is mentioned.What is view of this fake dr udoke about this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In sri Guru Granth sahib we read

ਮਰਦਾਸ ਭਲੇ ਕਉ ਦੀਆ ॥

अमरदास भले कउ दीआ ॥

Amarḏās bẖale ka▫o ḏī▫ā.

which He passed on to Guru Amar Daas, of the Bhalla dynasty.

ਤਿਨਿ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਦਾਸੁ ਸੋਢੀ ਥਿਰੁ ਥਪ੍ਯ੍ਯਉ ॥

तिनि स्री रामदासु सोढी थिरु थप्यउ ॥

Ŧin sarī Rāmḏās sodẖī thir thap▫ya▫o.

Then, He firmly established the Great Raam Daas of the Sodhi dynasty.

ang 1401

Now dynasty of two Guru sahibans is mentioned.What is view of this fake dr udoke about this?

Dasam Granth is only the first step. After they have discarded Dasam Granth they will next target will be Sri Guru Granth Sahib Jee. They will first start by doubting banis the Vaar of Satta and Balwand, then Batta de swaye, and Bhagat Banis and so one and so forth. Dr Udoke is like those Khalistani uncles in the west who have been influenced by the Kala Afghanis and have gone away from the Khalistan movement of Sant Bhindranwalay and the Shaheeds to the heretics side. Although Udoke is not as bad at the missionaries yet, as he does beleive in some Dasam Banis, but he is heading the wrong way. He needs to focus on his political theories instead of trying to act like a religious scholar by giving verdicts on religious matters.

I'll never understand why it is only in Sikhism where we have non religious, or political type people who have half or no knowledge of religion passing religious verdicts on religious matters. In any other religion it is always scholars who pass religious verdicts on religious matters. In a way it is our own fault that we give political people the respect of a religious scholar. We need to see people for what they are. Political people are political, not religious scholars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dasam Granth is only the first step. After they have discarded Dasam Granth they will next target will be Sri Guru Granth Sahib Jee. They will first start by doubting banis the Vaar of Satta and Balwand, then Batta de swaye, and Bhagat Banis and so one and so forth. Dr Udoke is like those Khalistani uncles in the west who have been influenced by the Kala Afghanis and have gone away from the Khalistan movement of Sant Bhindranwalay and the Shaheeds to the heretics side. Although Udoke is not as bad at the missionaries yet, as he does beleive in some Dasam Banis, but he is heading the wrong way. He needs to focus on his political theories instead of trying to act like a religious scholar by giving verdicts on religious matters.

I'll never understand why it is only in Sikhism where we have non religious, or political type people who have half or no knowledge of religion passing religious verdicts on religious matters. In any other religion it is always scholars who pass religious verdicts on religious matters. In a way it is our own fault that we give political people the respect of a religious scholar. We need to see people for what they are. Political people are political, not religious scholars.

Udoke says in this video that one should not comment on religious scripture like Dasam Granth sahib.Yet it is him who himself is doing that. He had no answer to the question. He was beating about bush.He is a maverick who will change his stand overnight just like he discarded his amrit after he put his foot on foreign soil first time.

Guru sahib's writings are word of God and no human should try to interpret those per his/her wisdom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Udoke says in this video that one should not comment on religious scripture like Dasam Granth sahib.Yet it is him who himself

is doing that. He had no answer to the question. He was beating about bush.He is a maverick who will change his stand overnight

just like he discarded his amrit after he put his foot on foreign soil first time.

Guru sahib's writings are word of God and no human should try to interpret those per his/her wisdom.

Yes thats also a valid point that he is going against what he said on this video.

Also, dont understand the discarded amrit part either??

Firstly the amrit was not 'his' as you have said. And 2ndly, I swear it can't be that easy to discard!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

d veo

Yes thats also a valid point that he is going against what he said on this video.

Also, dont understand the discarded amrit part either??

Firstly the amrit was not 'his' as you have saidm. And 2ndly, I swear it can't be that easy to discard!!

Udoke was in the news along some other Gursikhs in early 2000s after kala afghana had written his books.

He wrote an article against Kala afghana and these gursikhs raised money and sent him abroad.

After setting his foot on foreign soil firs time he got dazzled.He considered his articles of khalsa faith as an

obstacle in becoming a modern sikh. So he removed his kirpan( sri sahib) and kachhehra.He was reprimanded

on return to india and those gursikhs disassociated themselves from udoke since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So, are you saying Guru ji isn't God? Or are you saying the British encouraged this belief?
    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use