Jump to content

A True Gursikh Wedding???


Akaali
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

grin.gif well, firstly i dont think the people who posted their pics online want to know whether we see them as TRUE gursikhs or not. Secondly i dont think two bottles of wine if that is wine gives us enough information as to whether the Amritdharis were drinking or not. Its probably a gift or someting that someone brought with them.

Its million times better than any punjabi wedding where you dont see any wiskey bottles on the tables, but u do see the drunken uncles on the floor with the bottle next to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said they were drinking, and I don't care if they want me to judge them as true gursikhs or not, I'm still gonna do it cuz they're representing the Sikhi saroop.

How can you say this is any better than any punjabi party? Apparantly not all parties have drunken uncles on the floor, most of them have the decency to hold a decent party for the entire family, there maybe some idiots who get drunk.

Having the saroop of Guru Gobind Singh ji, and doing those things is not suitable for any Singh/Singhni, and especially kissing in public its just disgusting, let alone it shows them being overpowered by moh or kaam, whatever you wanna call it.

Sure they might've got the bottle as a present, but it just goes to show what type of friends they have and how much they know each other. Giving a Singh, a bottle of wine or whisky is just absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having the saroop of Guru Gobind Singh ji, and doing those things is not suitable for any Singh/Singhni, and especially kissing in public its just disgusting, let alone it shows them being overpowered by moh or kaam, whatever you wanna call it.

Sure they might've got the bottle as a present, but it just goes to show what type of friends they have and how much they know each other. Giving a Singh, a bottle of wine or whisky is just absurd.

[sarcasm] Rather you should show no emotions towards your wife, be a straight face thru your wedding. If you don't that would mean you are enjoying 'your' wedding and if you are kissing your wife showing affection you are engrossed in Maya and are showing Sexual Desire. [/sarcasm] Kaam is Kaam regardless if you do it in the Seclusion of your house or if you do it in Public. You cannot say with 100% Certainty that they are expressing Kaam. Physically Kissing could be more innocent and pure than someone just thinking about kissing in a Sexual Manner.

Not everyone has a conservative and expressionless view on Sikhi.

Kissing being 'disgusting' is your feeling on somone expressing their Love for each other. Who are you to get in their way and judge their actions without fully knowing them. Just as you say they dont know their friends well to give them such a gift of wine, well it just goes to who how little you know them to pass judgement on their actions.

Forgive me if this sound overboard but your judgment on the couple and their friends from seeing them in a picutre ONLY is rather premature and frankly arrogant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having the saroop of Guru Gobind Singh ji, and doing those things is not suitable for any Singh/Singhni, and especially kissing in public its just disgusting, let alone it shows them being overpowered by moh or kaam, whatever you wanna call it.

Sure they might've got the bottle as a present, but it just goes to show what type of friends they have and how much they know each other. Giving a Singh, a bottle of wine or whisky is just absurd.

[sarcasm] Rather you should show no emotions towards your wife, be a straight face thru your wedding. If you don't that would mean you are enjoying 'your' wedding and if you are kissing your wife showing affection you are engrossed in Maya and are showing Sexual Desire. [/sarcasm] Kaam is Kaam regardless if you do it in the Seclusion of your house or if you do it in Public. You cannot say with 100% Certainty that they are expressing Kaam. Physically Kissing could be more innocent and pure than someone just thinking about kissing in a Sexual Manner.

Not everyone has a conservative and expressionless view on Sikhi.

Kissing being 'disgusting' is your feeling on somone expressing their Love for each other. Who are you to get in their way and judge their actions without fully knowing them. Just as you say they dont know their friends well to give them such a gift of wine, well it just goes to who how little you know them to pass judgement on their actions.

Forgive me if this sound overboard but your judgment on the couple and their friends from seeing them in a picutre ONLY is rather premature and frankly arrogant.

98089[/snapback]

I totally agree with pheena veer ji. it depends on person to person how they express their love. For some people even "holding hand" in public is a BIG thing or 'disgusting'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats my view towards those pictures, I don't argue over such stupidity. Its common sense for those who know from right and wrong.

98095[/snapback]

Don't get me wrong veer, i am not against one expressing their views, just as i have expresed mine. But i do feel as your views perhaps unintentionally are suffocating the essense of expressing affection and the freedom to express ones self in a manner that is rightous to them. Farmost of all you and I have no idea who these people are and here we are making assumption on whether what they are doing is right or wrong. One thing i have learned is never conclude on half the information. Until one does not know for certain he/she can only make Assumptions and create false impressions.

Its also common sense to not base assumptions on preconceived pattern of actions that are without the intent of seeking the reality of the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So, are you saying Guru ji isn't God? Or are you saying the British encouraged this belief?
    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use