Kurdistan And Khalistan

[kurtas]

Theres alot of lessons to be learnt from kurds. They have suffered similar tales of persecution but are still able to form their own national armed units, have autonomy in the land they still hold, and so on. Yet Kurds are in a much better position than khalistani's becos their leadership is more dynamic and flexible.. our is rigid and basic thinking only.

Until their is a change of the present leaders of Khalistan movement with ones who can be inclusive with hindu punjabi neighbours and adding sehajdhari / mona Sikhs in their ranks then their is little chance of indepedance of Khalistan any time soon.

114244[/snapback]

The Kurds are riddled with factions who oppose one another. The PKK from Turkey are not welcomed by the Kurds in Iraq (KDP etc). Similar story with Kurds in Iran and Syria.

They are not united and their leadership is very similar to that of khalistani groups. Fighting between groups is common. They have no unified structure of command hence why they have been fighting for 40/50 years in the various Kurdish areas without achieving very much besides an autonomous zone in northern Iraq.

[kurtas]

the kurds are in iraq and iran right?

115190[/snapback]

and in Turkey and Syria.

[CDN]

"we cant have a person ruling Khalistan - we need panj piyare, and guru ji "

LOL

so khalistan will not be a democracy?

what about muslims, hindus, and christians in Khalistan....are they not supposed to drink or eat meat?

Will Khalistan become the next Saudi Arabia or Iran?

[PunjabiPredator]

we cant have a person ruling Khalistan - we need panj piyare, and guru ji "

LOL

We need panj pyaare and Guru Granth Saab Ji for Khalistan

so khalistan will not be a democracy?

what about muslims, hindus, and christians in Khalistan....are they not supposed to drink or eat meat?

I don't think Muslims and Hindus and Christains will be in Khalistan if they are drinking and meat will be banned. Khalistan will be based on Sikhi rules just like USA is based on Christain rules and Iran is based on Muslim rules and India is based on Hindustani rules. I don't know why you people are so worried about others for when others haven't even bothered caring about Sikh issues. Our Guru Ji's taught us the right way to follow our religion people will disagree or agree with us when we achieve Khalistan just like people agree and disagree with USA or Iran on what there policies are. 

Will Khalistan become the next Saudi Arabia or Iran?

It won't become the next Saudia Arabia or Iran because it will be based upon the Guru Granth Saab and Panj Pyare.

[CDN]

^thanks for answering my question

you have proved why khalistan will never be accepted by majority of sikhs and by the majority of people worldwide.

if sikhs want to impose sikh rules on non-sikhs....than the US and Canada should force sikhs to cut there hair and close there gurdwaras.

[Sabre Sword]

Eating meat, drinking is up 2 the individual, if you want to impose the gursikh way of life upon people, that in itself is anti-sikh. sikhs are NOT alowed to force sikhi upon someone.

i mean look at afghanistan, taliban forced islam amongst people, after the fall of the taliban all the men that wer forced to keep beards ran away and shaved n got haircuts.

back in the days of khalsa raj was sikhi forced upon peple?...Nope.

see people who say ANTI-SIKH things like oh eating meat and drikin will be banned and cutin hair will be banned blah blah blah are just giving the anti khalistanis a good excuse fo no khalistan,

[singh surma]

i agree with Sabre Sword...

[PunjabiPredator]

^thanks for answering my question

you have proved why khalistan will never be accepted by majority of sikhs and by the majority of people worldwide.

if sikhs want to impose sikh rules on non-sikhs....than the US and Canada should force sikhs to cut there hair and close there gurdwaras.

What majority of the Sikhs are you talking about the ones that drink, or cut there hair or eat meat and call themselves Sikhs or the ones that are amrit dari and follow there religion which are the real Sikhs. The real Sikhs that are amrit dari all support Khalistan the ones that claim to be Sikh don't support Khalistan. You can find out for yourself by doing a survey :TH: Muslims impose there rule in there countries on Christains and other non Muslims and Hindus force there rule on there people and i don't see US or CANADA forcing muslims to do stuff or Hindus so i don't why you are so againt Sikh rule and against Khalistan.

[PunjabiPredator]

Eating meat, drinking is up 2 the individual, if you want to impose the gursikh way of life upon people, that in itself is anti-sikh. sikhs are NOT alowed to force sikhi upon someone.

i mean look at afghanistan, taliban forced islam amongst people, after the fall of the taliban all the men that wer forced to keep beards ran away and shaved n got haircuts.

back in the days of khalsa raj was sikhi forced upon peple?...Nope.

see people who say ANTI-SIKH things like oh eating meat and drikin will be banned and cutin hair will be banned blah blah blah are just giving the anti khalistanis a good excuse fo no khalistan,

Yeah eating meat and drinking is up to the person. It isn't anti Sikh they can go to another country and do that somewhere else and shouldn't call themselves Sikhs either then. No-one is forcing people to become Gursikhs but if they want to live that life then they can and in Khalistan and if they don't want too then they can follow a different religion or whatever they want to do with there life in another place. Well the Anti Khalistanis are not Sikh you don't see any of our Guru Jis needing meat or drinking when they were here teaching us about the Sikhi life do you and they treated us equal to them when they could have treated us below there level. What is it with you and Sikhi being forced? No-one says Sikhi will be forced it will be made stronger with our own Country and more people learning about it and everyone around the world will know what a Sikh is and where we come from.

[Sabre Sword]

Yeah eating meat and drinking is up to the person. It isn't anti Sikh they can go to another country and do that somewhere else and shouldn't call themselves Sikhs either then. No-one is forcing people to become Gursikhs but if they want to live that life then they can and in Khalistan and if they don't want too then they can follow a different religion or whatever they want to do with there life in another place.

To kick someone out of punjab WHICH IS THEIR HOME MIGHT I REMIND YOU! because they eat meat is ANTI-SIKH.

Regarding our misguided brothers calling themselves sikhs, well like i said before all we can do is teach them about sikhi.

You cant force people not to eat meat and drink, its up to then individual, and yes, by threatining to kick someone out of punjab because they eat meat IS FORCING THEM. dont you think?

Study sikhi and become sikh, the stuff your saying shouldnt come from one of guru gobind jis sons.

Also, khalistan will never force 'sikh' rules upon non sikhs in the country as islamic countries do, if that ever happend in khalistan then it is no longer a sikh state.

remember the 5 qualities khalsa are ment to strive to.

Truth.

Contentment.

Patience.

Compassion.

Righteousness.