A Bahman's Blog:khalistan Jokes

[Lionchild]

He is a jatt dont u see agarwal on his name.

i find comment number 11 quite funny but how do you know he's a brahmin???

agarwals are banias .... not jatts ..... he is a behari bania .... because of singh and agarwal in his name ...

lol

[khalsaforce]

maybe he is bania bro. chal koi na apa ki lehna dehna. online bhonkda via,personally nai.

He is a jatt dont u see agarwal on his name.

i find comment number 11 quite funny but how do you know he's a brahmin???

agarwals are banias .... not jatts ..... he is a behari bania .... because of singh and agarwal in his name ...

[manjot]

maybe he is bania bro. chal koi na apa ki lehna dehna. online bhonkda via,personally nai.

[Amrit World]

(1) First of all, he wrote about Sindhi Hindus...... Adwani, Lalwani etc are Sindhi Hindus' surnames.

(2) Then, he wrote about Malyalis. Nair, Menon are Hindu Brahmans' Gotras.

(3) He then wrote : - What are the degrees of egoism in Tamil Nadu?

I, Iyer, Iyengar.

Iyengers are Tamil Brahmans.

(4) Then he makes comments about Khalistan.

(5) He goes further and makes fun of A.P. (Andhra Pradesh, a state of India).

( 6) He makes comments about India's nation song 'Jan Gan Man'......

(7) He wrote, "What do you call a bong who talks a lot, sometimes without making sense?

Mr. Chatter Jee."

Chatterjee is a surname of Hindu Bengalis.

(8) See these comments, "What do you call a bong who takes bribe?

Mr. Goosh"

Ghosh is a surname of Bengali Hindus.

So, if you think he is anti-Sikh because he made comments on Khalistan, then you will have to accept that he is anti Hindu, anti-Andhra and anti-India.

Agrawal is a surname of Vaishya community. In Hindi or Punjabi, they are mostly known as Baniyas. Agrasen (as in its url) was a mythological (many believes him a historical) figure of Vaishyas, who was once King of Agroha in India.

So, he is niether Brahman, nor Jatt. He is vaishya. And if he is anti-Sikh (as a few of you think), he is then anti-Hindu also.

A few comments by visitors against Hindus on that blog are very bad. A Sikh cannot use such a bad language.

[Guest PunjabSingh]

i find comment number 11 quite funny but how do you know he's a brahmin???

Doesnt the name Sher Singh 'Aggarwal" tell you something ?

Who says Aggarwals are jatts or Sikhs ?

[Gupt Lion]

agree with amrit world

agree with amrit world

[Guest PRITAM SINGH KHALSA]

I though the "break dancing"{breakdan Singh} one was funny. :TH:

[Bad Girl]

read last 2 replies

:|

[manjot]

read last 2 replies

:|

Was that you who wrote, Bad Girl?

[Guest PunjabSingh]

Im sick and tired of these comments all over the forum "A true Sikh cannot do this ,a true Sikh cannot do that ...."

Which Sikhism are you following ? Mohan Das Karamchand Gandhi's Sikhism or Manmohan Kaur's Sikhism ?

Are these some kind of new Sikhisms ?

As Bhai Bittu says in this video 'Mahatma' Gandhi's principles dont hold good in Sikhism.

http://www.shiromanikhalsadal.net/download..._15-11-2005.wmv

Only a bold person can say this and that too just after being released from jail.

Violence and non violence goes hand in hand in Sikhism to get our rights.

For example :if SAD(Amritsar) doesnt give a befitting reply to the goodaism of badal dal then badal dal will engage in more violence.

Some people only understand the language of violence.

In the above jokes' context a reply had to be given from Sikh's side .So long as Madrasis,Sindhis and others are considered they may chose to give or not give their reply if and when they see it.