Jump to content

Police Say Sikh Funeral Pyre May Have Broken Cremation Laws


Golee Maro
 Share

Recommended Posts

Police say Sikh funeral pyre may have broken cremation laws

Thursday July 13, 2006 [The Guardian]

Police are investigating what is claimed to be the first British religious funeral pyre in modern times, because they believe the blaze many have broken cremation laws which prohibit the burning of human remains in the open air.

Yesterday's pyre in Stamfordham, Northumberland, was arranged after Rajpal Mehat, a 31-year-old Indian-born Sikh, drowned in a canal in Southall, west London, last December. His family asked Davender Ghai, president of the Newcastle-based Anglo-Asian Friendship Society, to help after authorities refused to allow his remains to be flown back to India.

Mr Ghai, who is a leading campaigner for funeral pyres to be held in Britain, claims that the 1930 Cremation Act does not forbid such ceremonies, and that the legislation is concerned only with the day-to-day running of crematoriums.

He said he had carried out the ceremony with the "blessing" of the Northumbria police, only to be told later that he had broken the law. "The police came down here and at first they stopped the cars," he said. "Then the officer said he had been in touch with the chief constable and said 'Yes, you can go ahead with the funeral pyre, according to your religion'." Mr Ghai added the family had not wanted Mr Mehat's soul to remain "restless" for so long after his death.

Northumbria police said last night that although they had allowed the ceremony to go ahead, they believed offences may have been committed.

"In respecting the values and beliefs of all faiths we did not wish to cause any additional upset to a grieving family," said Superintendent Graham Smith. "This meant all our inquiries were carried out in an extremely sensitive manner before the service got under way. Following further investigation, we believe offences may have been committed under the Cremation Act 1902 in relation to where human remains can legally be cremated."

A spokesman for the Department of Constitutional Affairs said: "The 1930 Cremation Act prohibits the cremation of human remains anywhere except in a crematorium."

Mr Ghai said: "We have got so many supporters, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs and Hindus."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Guest PRITAM SINGH KHALSA

I could see why they dont want open air pyres.

To some they will think somethings going on because it will smell like a BBQ. {It really does smell like a BBQ} Im not Joking this time, it really does

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PRITAM SINGH KHALSA

To some they will think somethings going on because it will smell like a BBQ. {It really does smell like a BBQ} Im not Joking this time, it really does

Didn't need to know that much. no.gif

Well its true, and now you actually know that it really smells like cooking meat unless you throw enough wood and inscence in and on the pyre. Think of this next time you feel like having a BBQ and are going to eat meat. :| mmmmmmmm yummy :wub:

post-5391-1152807416.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the problem here was that the relatives of the family got in touch with the gurudwara and asked them to perform the cremation and sukhmani sahib ji da path but whilst that paath was bein done, they family of the guy guy who died went and told a pandit from a hindu temple to perform the ceromony, so we had a few upset ppl saying whydidnt on religion or person perform the whole thing, why get hindus and sikhs involved, or why did they not tell the gurudwara the change of plans.

its no big deal, its good that we can do cremations like they do in punjab.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use