Jump to content

NANAKSAAR 2DAY


S1ngh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Very noble of you, although why you started it is beyond my comprehension. Anyway, well done.

I knew i shud stay away from damn politicks :@ @ ohh well.. Maff karna jee

As predicted, this is growing into a 'Sant bashing' thread, so I can't be bothered anymore, thanks for ruining it people, must say, it wasn't very original.

Woahh take it easy.. nobody said anything paenjee rolleyes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Akaal108

There are lot of sants and mahapursh in nanaksar thats correct.. they all stay in limits ...they dont open their new dera but open same nanak dharamsala but different places to spread guroo nanak sahib atam updesh...all of them have every strange unconditional love towards guroo nanak sahib nirankar and sant baba nand singh maharaj.... ^_^^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still waiting for Sehajleen Kaur to query wheather what I posted in my last thread is correct or not. I was told that by a Singh who went to Nanaksar when he was in his teen years and now he's around 35 and he is still attached to Nanaksar. He was one of the main tabla players who did seva in the 'group' of Baba Kundan Singh Ji. Even though this practise isn't carried out today I'm still curious why it was in the 'chardi kaala' days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why need sants if we have our living 11th guru srigurugranthsahib??

I read/hear/see more "sant" word rather than waheguru or "guru granth sahib je" in this forum and all other forums.. Are we some type of sants brainwashed? (no offense to any sant, just on their followers :@ @ ). And im pretty much sure that no true sant wants this type of fame.. I respect them, but don't go and worship them.. this is not a reply to nanaksar, but to all over sant thing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Akaal108

singh please leave the sants alone...

there huge debate on this already.. search for sant and you will find the debate..

let me ask you.. dont you want peace in your site??? i defo do.... then why bring topics like sant is not needed...just because just minority group of sikhs beleif so they are not needed and rest of majority do...do you wish to change the beleifs???

live and let live..... just follow your sikhi and be happy....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jee one thing we can't deny is 2 much sant pooja, esp at nanaksaar.

but i don't wanna bashhhhhhhhhhh

plz dont' bash a sant unless there is proof!!! then ofcourse that person aint a sant

like the vancouver walla sant, not the current one i think but one of em wuz cought boozin it up in las vegas am i wrong?

it wuz in the news like gorrah news

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Akaal108

but siri guroo granth sahib ji mentions sants/sadhu/bhramgyanis/...but now please dont tell me sant word reffered to guroo sahiban only.. which some of jathabandis beleive...

There is old saying... today sikhs of western countries can beleive in 2 dollar books by scholar but cant beleive in baachan of mahapurkh..

i m not responding anymore whether sant word should be used or not...just follow your sikhi only... that all should matter...

debates are already be done...

if any more information on nanaksar dharamsala you need.. you should go to your local nanaksar gurdwara to sort it out with the jathedar... argue with them.. all you like...

:e:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use