Hypocracy?

[B4ND4]

Many practices have chged over a period of time. Langar is prepared by amritdharis while reciting bani. Amritdharis are supposed to eat food cooked by amritdharis, panj pyaare tell this too. Not many amritdharis are there in the gurughars these days so it seems evrythg has become acceptable. BIBEK isn't a mere word..its has a deeper meaning to it..try it and feel the difference :wub: .

ps: have a discussion like sikhs instead of pointing fingers at jathas.

[Guest Narinder Singh]

So non sikhs are not allowed to do seva in our guru ghars?

Wait..i cant say ours because im not amritdhari, which means im not sikh, which means i cant do seva in gurdwareh...

[singh70]

Banda - i vehamently disagree.

5 pyare did not tell me to practice this interpretation of bibek.

Nowhere in the Guru Granth Sahib ji is this stated. More importantly the Guru Granth Sahib ji

criticises these practices as committed by brahmins and yet we have sikhs doing the same.

It seems that some folks prefer to listen to baba's, saints, and dodgy rehatnamas than the Guru Granth Sahib Ji.

Look around , the flour which makes roti is prepared by non-amritdharis.

The walkers crisp are prepared by non amritdharis.

The biscuits from your local tescos, the cheese, the butter, the sauce, the pasta, the beans, the potatoes, the vegetables grown in farms, everything virtually is prepared by non-amrithdaris

Tell me do the Bibeki's honestly refrain from these?

Do they plant and grown their own vegetables and churn their own butter etc?

Bibek = BI means 2 and ek means 1.

To move from duality to the one Vaheguru.

[Guest Narinder Singh]

Banda - i vehamently ................one Vaheguru.

Youre my new best friend!

[B4ND4]

I am not gonna argue over this issue guys, do what suits you the best :wub:

ps: thats a funny meaning of bibek you gave.

[Tarrandeep Kaur]

hmmm you know what its not even worth debating.

how is it hurting you if someone is blessed with keeping food bibek rehit?

bwdu ibbwdu kwhU isau n kIjY ]

baadh bibaadh kaahoo sio n keejai ||

Do not engage in any arguments or debates with anyone.

rsnw rwm rswienu pIjY ]2]

rasanaa raam rasaaein peejai ||2||

With your tongue, savor the Lord's sublime essence. ||2||

vahiguroooo

[Guest Narinder Singh]

hmmm you know what its not even worth debating.

how is it hurting you if someone is blessed with keeping food bibek rehit?

bwdu ibbwdu kwhU isau n kIjY ]

baadh bibaadh kaahoo sio n keejai ||

Do not engage in any arguments or debates with anyone.

rsnw rwm rswienu pIjY ]2]

rasanaa raam rasaaein peejai ||2||

With your tongue, savor the Lord's sublime essence. ||2||

vahiguroooo

Its offensive when one preaches equality and seeing god in all, but doesnt eat from that person theyre supposed see god in. And In the sangat karra parshad is given to the PANJ PYARE (the guru), yet its not offensive at all when a so called bibeki (means something completely different) doesnt accept that prashad?

Guru Nanak Dev ji criticizes brahmins for indulging in such practices, how can one possibly justify such practices to be ok for sikhs?

Fateh.

[B4ND4]

^^ Narinder bai, things aren't that simple. If we see Waheguru in all then any random person would be eligible to do Panj Pyrre di seva too.

[Guest Narinder Singh]

^^ Narinder bai, things aren't that simple. If we see Waheguru in all then any random person would be eligible to do Panj Pyrre di seva too.

So its ok for someone not to eat the prashad given to the panj pyare because that someone is bibeki?

[Guest Narinder Singh]

Chalo, gurdwarea nu chado, i understand that there is a maryada that needs to be upheld there, but what about elsewhere? When Amritdharis dont accept food from people who are not Amritdhari (particulary from the same jatha)?