Images Of Shiva

[BaBa.G]

SARPANCH, WHY DO YOU FEEL THE NEED TO BADMOUTH HINDU'S EVERY CHANCE YOU GET? DO YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING BETTER TO DO THEN RUIN A THREAD WITH YOUR ANTI-HINDU COMMENTS? IF YOU HAVE NOTHING POSITIVE TO SAY THEN DON'T SAY IT AT ALL. YOU BRING SO MUCH NEGATIVITY TO MANY THREADS THAT YOU POST IN. YOUR CONTINUED RACIST AND HATRED REMARKS WILL NOT GET YOU FAR IN LIFE, OR SIKHI.

[sunny_love_kirtan]

I THINK THIS THREAD IS A TRICK AND CREATED TO MAKE CONTROVERSIES HERE AND FREED AND SHIVAJI ARE BOTH RESPONCIBLE.

SEE HOW SOME ONE CREATED ONE ID SHIVAJI

Group: Members

Posts: 7

Joined: 29-September 07

Member No.: 13409

JUST 2 DAYS BEFORE THIS TOPIC.....?????

AND WHEN U TYPE SHIVJI THERE ARE MANY IMAGES OF SHIV IN GOOGLE BUT THE IMAGES POSTED BY FREED ARE JUST MEANING LESS TO POST AND ONE HAVE KHANDA BEIND IT AND ITS ALL ABOUT CREATING CONTROVERSY.

THERE IS REALLY SOMETHING WRONG.

[Mutheeaa]

^^^ From what i remeber Freed posted many kewl gurji's pics before also.

[sunny_love_kirtan]

i am so sorry but i just shared what my mind thought.

i dnt know history of FREED but i am sorry if i am wrong.

FREED JI PLZ DNT MIND. PLEASE CORRECT ME.

[SaRpAnCh]

SARPANCH, WHY DO YOU FEEL THE NEED TO BADMOUTH HINDU'S EVERY CHANCE YOU GET? DO YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING BETTER TO DO THEN RUIN A THREAD WITH YOUR ANTI-HINDU COMMENTS? IF YOU HAVE NOTHING POSITIVE TO SAY THEN DON'T SAY IT AT ALL. YOU BRING SO MUCH NEGATIVITY TO MANY THREADS THAT YOU POST IN. YOUR CONTINUED RACIST AND HATRED REMARKS WILL NOT GET YOU FAR IN LIFE, OR SIKHI.

You lot all make me laugh,I AM SIMPLY TELLING YOU THE TRUTH,HINDUISM= BRAHMINISM,NO DIFFERENCE

READ

Manusmriti – Law book of Hinduisum

I – 93. As the Brahmana sprang from (Prajapati’s i.e. God’s) mouth, as he was first-born, and as he possesses the veda, he is by right the lord of this whole creation.

XI – 261-62. A Brahmana who has killed even the peoples of the three worlds, is completely freed from all sins on reciting three times the Rig, Yajur or Sama- Veda with the Upanishad.

II – 100. Whatever exists in the world is the property of the Brahmana; on account of the excellence of his origin the Brahmana is indeed, entitled to it all. Including all kind of wealth, foods, he can have every woman in the world including his own mother, sister or daughter.

Hinduism on shudras

Jatt ,tarkhan, chamar and dalits are all modern time factions of sudars

IV – 99. He (Braman) must never read (the vedas) ----- in the presence of the shudras.

X – 129. No collection of wealth must be made by a shudra even though he is able to do it; for a shudra who has acquired wealth gives pain to Brahmana.

VIII – 270. A shudra who insults a Braman man with gross invective, shall have his tongue cut out; for he is of low origin.

VIII – 271. If he mentions names and castes of the (Braman) with contumely, an iron nail, ten fingers long red hot, shall be thrusted into his mouth.

XII. 4. If the shudra intentionally listens for committing to memory the veda, then his ears should be filled with (molten) lead and lac; if he utters the veda, then his tongue should be cut off; if he has mastered the veda his body should be cut to pieces.

The status of women in Hinduism

Women is a slave of the bramana and she must live her life according to his wishes

IX – 317. A Brahmin, whether learned or ignorant, is a powerful divinity.

IX – 3 . Her father protects (her) in childhood, her husband protects (her) in youth and her sons protect (her) in old age; a woman is never fit for independence.

IX – 18. Women have no business with the text of the veda.

IX – 189. The property of a Brahmana must never be taken by the king, that is a settled rule; but (the property of men) of other castes the king may take on failure of all (heirs).

NOW ARE YOU LOT ALSO GOING TO DENY THAT THIS IS HINDUISM?!??!?

[GABROO KHALISTAN DAH]

I understand where sarpanch is comming from, but we should not bad mouth some1 elses religion, no matter what.

that said, This thread feels like something created by rss, look the Sikhs are intrusted in Shiva ji.

[chatanga]

sarpanch, sure that is hinduism but hindusim is more than just what you've posted. But dont assume that if hindus are bad, then hinduism is bad. jus like there are many stupid sikhs, (some even in bana) who give the impression that sikhi is bad, but WE know that aint true, dont we?

You have a point tho that the Hindus rarely have sympathised wiv the suffering of the Sikh people. Indivudually they have but as a community or nation, they never have. One only has to read an account of Sardar Kapur Singh's life to find out.

However the depiction of ShivJee on this site means nothing, unless you wanna make an issue of it.

[kam1825]

Sarpanch since your knowledge of sikhism is in black and white and seems to have no grey. according to sikhism where are the khashatris, vais and shudras mentined. they are not brahmans. are they not hindus???

if they are then brahmanism is not hinduism but a small part of a large sanatan faith

[Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib]

Waheguru ji ka khalsa

Waheguru ji ki fateh,

:lol:

gurfateh

I know how u feel :cry: _oh_OLD:

[singhfromthehood]

:lol: