Jump to content

Kirpans A Secruity Risk? Bbc Asian Network


singh1986
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The BBC should be renamed the British Bukwas Service. Even their own report recenty noted that a majority of their employees hold liberal views. So much so that many accuse the BBC of only employing people holding certain political views. The BBC goes out of its way to promote Muslim views and recently used the 60th anniversary of the partition to transmit anti-Sikh propaganda. It has scored some massive blunders in the last few years. In 2005 in transmitted a documentary 'The power of nightmares' which argued as the byline said "the Power of Nightmares explores how the idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organised terrorist network is an illusion" Five months later 4 Muslims blew up tubes on the London underground. A month before 7/7 they made a documentary called Don't panic I'm Islamic" about the supposed backlash against Muslim after 9/11 and how trying to show a variety of Muslims talking about how they are not a threat to Britain. The funny thing is that the documentary featured a Muslim women going on about how she could understand something taking part in a suicide bombing! It also featured a group of Muslims taking part in regular paintballing trips. The irony is that these same Muslims are now in court accused of organising 'terror training'!! :homer

The 'Asians' at the BBC are no better, they're just a bunch of coconuts, trying to please their gora bosses. Any <banned word filter activated> who's willing to tow the BBC line that the experience of most Asians in UK is of young people trying to avoid arranged marriages & honour killings, the elders work in corner shops and are out of touch and the kids are confused between two cultures will get to go on the BBC gravy train. Any 'Asian' character on any BBC soap usually has to go through the above during their stint on the soap.

agree with some but not they're cocunts. they are left wing extreme loonnies.

bbc is government owned, if you want a change dont vote labour simple.

..and kick out nihal of of his bbc studio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woolly liberal organisations like the BBC do minority groups no favours at all. These sanctimonious liberals impose there own ideas, ideals and archetypes upon minority groups and bask in the fake afterglow of their own 'alturism'; however this phenomenon isn't really alturism; because these liberals expect fawning gratitude from the minority masses.

While I all equality and the establishment of a level playing field for all groups; the sponsorship of a state broadcaster does nothing too help a multicultural Britain.

In the preceding centuries, left leaning ideologies have killed more people than lassiez faire ones (Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot et al); whereas with lassiez faire a minority at least has a glimmer of a change to build himself up from nothing to sometime by virtue of his own endevours.

Leftist organisations are also an anathema to Sikh philosophy, as Sikhi is an ideology that demands the individual to be self sufficient and to proceed in their careers with honest undertakings free from the corrupt machinery/beaurocracy of state apparatus.

I also disagree with the BBC from an economic standpoint; why should PAY to watch something as ubiquitous as television? It's just another insipid tax to fund an organisation thats grown fat of a billion pound subsidy and something that i hardly ever watch or listen to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woolly liberal organisations like the BBC do minority groups no favours at all. These sanctimonious liberals impose there own ideas, ideals and archetypes upon minority groups and bask in the fake afterglow of their own 'alturism'; however this phenomenon isn't really alturism; because these liberals expect fawning gratitude from the minority masses.

While I all equality and the establishment of a level playing field for all groups; the sponsorship of a state broadcaster does nothing too help a multicultural Britain.

In the preceding centuries, left leaning ideologies have killed more people than lassiez faire ones (Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot et al); whereas with lassiez faire a minority at least has a glimmer of a change to build himself up from nothing to sometime by virtue of his own endevours.

Leftist organisations are also an anathema to Sikh philosophy, as Sikhi is an ideology that demands the individual to be self sufficient and to proceed in their careers with honest undertakings free from the corrupt machinery/beaurocracy of state apparatus.

I also disagree with the BBC from an economic standpoint; why should PAY to watch something as ubiquitous as television? It's just another insipid tax to fund an organisation thats grown fat of a billion pound subsidy and something that i hardly ever watch or listen to.

After a read through a dictionary! :) Yeah man!! :TH: You studied social sciences? grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woolly liberal organisations like the BBC do minority groups no favours at all. These sanctimonious liberals impose there own ideas, ideals and archetypes upon minority groups and bask in the fake afterglow of their own 'alturism'; however this phenomenon isn't really alturism; because these liberals expect fawning gratitude from the minority masses.

While I all equality and the establishment of a level playing field for all groups; the sponsorship of a state broadcaster does nothing too help a multicultural Britain.

In the preceding centuries, left leaning ideologies have killed more people than lassiez faire ones (Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot et al); whereas with lassiez faire a minority at least has a glimmer of a change to build himself up from nothing to sometime by virtue of his own endevours.

Leftist organisations are also an anathema to Sikh philosophy, as Sikhi is an ideology that demands the individual to be self sufficient and to proceed in their careers with honest undertakings free from the corrupt machinery/beaurocracy of state apparatus.

I also disagree with the BBC from an economic standpoint; why should PAY to watch something as ubiquitous as television? It's just another insipid tax to fund an organisation thats grown fat of a billion pound subsidy and something that i hardly ever watch or listen to.

you wah?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Nihal muppet was on TV a few months ago on The Wright Stuff on Channel 5. He's not really that articulate and couldn't put forward a cogent argument which was pretty embarrassing for the presenter. They probably picked him up because hey wanted to have an 'asian' voice of the yoof! These BBC asian types probably got to where they are throught a quota system rather than through any real talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use