Jump to content

Sant Jarnail Singh Khalsa Bhindranwalee ji


Gupt daasan daas
 Share

Recommended Posts

ok bhol chukke muaff

basically wot ghulam singh sed about wot happened has happened is tru. but u guys want khalistan, but u hav 2 luk @ the political side, dont matter if its a independant sikh state or not, you still need 2 think really carefully. cuz khalistan is gonna b jus punjab (thats wot m hearin so far), how u gonna get 2 hajoor sahib n patna sahib? n hemkunt? it needs 2 b bigger. i no theres all this sikh violations the army has done, but can u not ask leaders like blair n bush 2 say something? HERE IN THE UK THERE R SIKHS THAT SAYIN 2 BLAIR 2 DO SUMMAT, THERE WILL B A MASSIVE MARCH ON 6TH JUNE. CONTACT info@thesikh-times.co.uk 4 MORE DETAILS. n luk how small dat homeland will b 4 150 million ppl. then ghulam singh sez slowley we will start 2 annexe terratories. for a start this is woz nehru feared, he thought the singhs wud b so strong eventually they wud end up running india as well as pakistan, it is sed that b4 independance day nehru n jinnah were worried about this idea, result punjab woz divided in 2 bits. n so nehru wanted 2 make punjab even smaller, thus the punjab we hav 2day. bak 2 khalistan, luk @ how strong india n pakistan r, india is 3rd largest (usa, china then india is powerful) n pakistan is 5th. where will khalistan get? of course it will b strong but luk @ punjab water system, thats in so much debt, all the waters goin 2 other states. 2 fix that the water industry needs RS 300 crore 2 fix that, cuz the water is really bad. anyway as for the khalistani army do u think the india army is gonna run away? they got the famous arjun tanks (even if they r quite old but still powerful), if we start 2 launch an invasion u hav 2 giv alot of money, the iraq war costed 12

bilion dollars, so do you think khalistan cud afford 2 go 2 war? n even if we r winning the war (cuz singhs r brave n stuff) then america n uk will step in n say human rights, invasion is against world law (or UN law, n if we start an invasion the world will step in).

i dont mean 2 say ghulam singh woz stupid 4 sayin it, if thats how u take it ghulam, its gud ure sayin this, but u hav 2 luk on a political matter. its no gud jus sayin all this. u hav 2 think how u will start annexin terratries.

plus 2 make khalistan go far u need sum really really gud politicions not badal n tohra. they jus fite, n that will tear khalistan wacko.gif n also luk @ 2days singhs that r all high, they all get bribed 2 do something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

why by the end of 2004? who said sant ji will be back in 2004? sant ji is in Akal Purkhs Hukam and will return when he is given the order to do so. For those of you who say sant ji would never have run away, you are correct. Sant ji did not run; he was given hukam by 5 singhs that he must leave darbar sahib. Even Sahib Sri Guru Gobind Singh ji Maharaj had to respect the hukam of 5 singhs and leave Chamkaur di gharhi. listen to the katha by bhai daljeet singh on this topic here.

thanks for the link real imfrmative khata

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balwinder Singh @ Feb 24 2004, 09:23 PM)

In BBC documentry on Sikhs, they showed the dead body of Sant ji 

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Where can i watch this documentry?? Or can any1 post a photo??

Fateh

You can watch the video on http://www.saintsoldiers.net I don't think it was his body though someone elses :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest SaintSoldier

Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale was a man of his word, and if he said "Physical death I do not fear" he damn well stuck by that.

Lets just step aside from all this debate, imagine he did come out, as some people suggest, what impact would that have on his legacy?

Mistaken people already suggest he was responsible for bringing much Sikh young to their deaths. If he just appeared what would those people say? Sant Ji was a man of principle, honour, and his word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

um im sure sant jee isnt very worried about his 'legacy'. sant jee didnt run away. sant jee was a man of his word. but 5 singhs told sant jee to go. so taking that as hukam from guru sahib. sant jee left. and now he is awaiting hukam from dhan dhan siri guru gobind singh jee to come back. no official date has been given by sant baba thakur singh jee but the singhs with baba jee predicted this year. whether that prediction comes right or not...we'll just have to wait and see.

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

3 months to go till what? the singhs around baba jee made predictions that sant jee would come back in 2004. khalistani veer jee gave a good reason for why they made these predictions. baba jee never once gave a date as to when sant jee is coming back. the only thing baba jee says is sant jee will come back soon. how many times does someone have to say this before people stop repeating the same stuff over and over again.

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use