Jump to content

Kirtan


chatanga
 Share

Recommended Posts

"koee gaavai raagee naadhee baedhee bahu bhaath kar nehee har har bheejai raam raajae ||

Some sing of the Lord, through musical Ragas and the sound current of the Naad, through the Vedas, and in so many ways. But the Lord, Har, Har, is not pleased by these, O Lord King."

what this means is that u can have all the gyan of raah vedas and all that but rab will not be pleased if naam is missing. sikhi is all about naam jap thats what will count in mahrajis court. so i dont think theres anything wrong in namdhari kirtan as what i know they specially emphasize naamsimeran.

a lot of mainstream sikhs believe the tuk of neel baster phare as someone mentioned before in sou sakhi so it depends on what your views are i would listern to anyone doing kirtan espicially the puraten way of raag vidya how its ment to be done. bonus when the raagi is ful of naam weather naamdhari , nihang akj without naam and love for waheguru were nothing.

ਨਾਨਕ ਭੀਜੈ ਸਾਚੈ ਨਾਇ ॥੨

naanak bheejai sachai nae ||2||

O Nanak, the Lord is won over only by His Name.

http://www.searchgurbani.com/main.php?book...p;ShabadID=1670

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The first Raagis in Harmandir Sahib court of Guru Arjan Dev Ji were Muslims(we all know what happened to them)

The first Dhadis in the court of Guru Hargobind Sahib Ji were Muslims

It should not be limited to who can Sing Gurbani. But the person doing Kirtan should be doing it according to the Maryada Of Guru Gobind Singh Ji and should atleast understand what they are singing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what this means is that u can have all the gyan of raah vedas and all that but rab will not be pleased if naam is missing. sikhi is all about naam jap thats what will count in mahrajis court. so i dont think theres anything wrong in namdhari kirtan as what i know they specially emphasize naamsimeran.

I still feel there needs to be serious consideration on allowing visible groups from dehdhari following backgrounds from performing keertan or katha within our Guru Ghars. This does not infringe on their right to enjoy Gurbani but as a kaum we need to ensure that our public keertanis and kathavachaks adhere to at least the core fundamental of Sikhi of not accepting any living person as the jagdi jyot.

If we look at Raag, it can be seen as a throne on which Sikhi sits. If that Sikhi is violated or debased then that raag is just a raag and nothing more. I personally fail to see how it adds any benefit to us as a kaum if we accept something because we enjoy a specific performance at the expense of tolerating a false ideology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use