Jump to content

Dalai Lama was against our Movement Of 80s


S1ngh
 Share

Recommended Posts

I heard that he was giving full details of whatever information he had regarding the sikh movement of 80s. He was indebt to indian govt as they gave him the uncoditional support to stay in India as refugee. Not that we expecte anything from him and his people but at least they should not strongly opposed us by leaking/giving information about singhs.

Can anyone confirm this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well what goes around comes around. he believes in "karma" i believe.

now his people are being executed by Chinese forces and the world doesn't know how many and how they are being tortured. he says the Tibetan culture is in danger of being destroyed by China's efforts. hmmmm, sounds familiar.

regardless of whether he supported the sikhs or not, if our actions are just, they are approved by Akaal Purakh. If we are wrong, then no support by any human being can undo God's justice.

peace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how he could have any information to give the government.

That was my initial response when i heard this from one person long time ago.. i actually shrug it off.. yesterday, i was having convo about tibet and china and then this one guy said the same thing regarding lama being in same bed with indian govt. etc during late 80's and early 90s.

I am not sure whether its correct or not but i do know that there were singhs who in quite few numbers were fleeing punjab to tibet/nepal after late 80's.. So maybe its true and maybe its not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the dalai lama is a guest of the indian government and is in no position to support a insurgency against the people he is a guest of. the indian government is even very uneasy about him supporting his own people in tibet because of close ties with china.

also the dalai lama is commited to non-violence

as far as giving information to the government i don't know but i don't think the dalai lama would have any information about the khalistan movement

but regardless of what his views were we should still support the tibetians on their quest for religious freedom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol its easy for us to criticise people if we had that amount of power/cash im sure we'd have a nice big jet and wouldnt like people having a snide comment about us. as for the dalai lama being in bed with the indian govt i doubt it, as for saying its something to do with "karma" thats bull, was it something to do with "karma" that 1984 happened?!

bhul chuk maf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use