Report This New User Look At The Filth He Has Posted

[SaRpAnCh]

Look at this new user openly insulting the Gurus and Sikhi

''

It could be because she realised that Sikhs are no different from Hindus or Muslims. Sikhism theology is a fusion of Hinduism and Islam. Nanak, the "so called" founder of Sikhism never called himself a sikh but considered himself a hindu; rejecting certain rituals of Hinduism doesn't mean he rejected Hinduism. Nine of the gurus never had the five "Ks" which only becamee a sikh identity after tenth guru decided to make it so! As for Amitabh's mother being a sikh only in name - what a joke! That should make 99% of the Sikhs being "Sikh" only in name. Using Nanak's phrase "Na koi Hindu, na koi Musalmaan", it could be said - na koi Sikh either!!! One only has to visit any Gurdwara to see what a farce Sikhism as a religion has become. Worshipping a book is not different than praying to an idol! Depicting pictures of gurus who proabably never had long hair or wore turbun is ridiculous. So, get your own house in order first before making allegations!!!''

REPORT HIM

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showto...st&p=361617

[satpalahuja]

Look at this new user openly insulting the Gurus and Sikhi

''

It could be because she realised that Sikhs are no different from Hindus or Muslims. Sikhism theology is a fusion of Hinduism and Islam. Nanak, the "so called" founder of Sikhism never called himself a sikh but considered himself a hindu; rejecting certain rituals of Hinduism doesn't mean he rejected Hinduism. Nine of the gurus never had the five "Ks" which only becamee a sikh identity after tenth guru decided to make it so! As for Amitabh's mother being a sikh only in name - what a joke! That should make 99% of the Sikhs being "Sikh" only in name. Using Nanak's phrase "Na koi Hindu, na koi Musalmaan", it could be said - na koi Sikh either!!! One only has to visit any Gurdwara to see what a farce Sikhism as a religion has become. Worshipping a book is not different than praying to an idol! Depicting pictures of gurus who proabably never had long hair or wore turbun is ridiculous. So, get your own house in order first before making allegations!!!''

REPORT HIM

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showto...st&p=361617

I am amused that you want to report people you cannot argue with. It shows how insecure you are, and how mentally bankrupt you are. This is a shame, because though there are so many examples of sikh success stories, but there are too many santas and bantas are like you amongst us - Intolerant and useless people who would and will ruin any sikh run political establishment ( including your khalistan )

Today india is a success because level minded hindus from south india & bengal, also intelligent gujaratis and marwaris are balancing silly bhaiyyas from the cow belt, silly tribals from the centre and north east, and we over excitable Punjabis and Sikhs cannot have our own way.

coming back to your main post complaint - its not all that wrong.

Worshipping a book is not different than praying to an idol! - is that not true ?

Depicting pictures of gurus who probably never had long hair or wore turbun is ridiculous. - is that not true ?

Let me add something. I have read that Aarti means ( gagan mein thal - raag chand deepak bane ) that Guru Nanak Devji was criticizing ostentatious pretensions in religion. Then we silly sardarjis come along and cover Harmandir Sahib with gold.

So, get your own house in order first before making allegations!!!'' - ………………….now – is that not true as well ?

And about our Guru Nanak Dev ji being a Hindu - well .......... i dont believe at all that he considered himself to be a hindu, but i dont believe either that he wanted something very different. Guruji only wanted to rid Hinduism of brahmanical evils which he did not believe in.

Whatever i say, is open to debate. In brief, History means 'to dig the ground, find something, explain half of it, and add your own views to the other half not explained'. That is why we idolize Maharaja Ranjit Singh whereas the Pakistanis consider him to be an intolerant fanatic. And vice versa about Aurangzeb.

[SaRpAnCh]

I can't be bothered going over for the millionth time about why we are a unique nation Guru has said don;t bother arguing with idiots .

and what are you trying to say by the following:

''Depicting pictures of gurus who probably never had long hair or wore turbun is ridiculous. - is that not true ?''

All our Gurus had long hair and turbans

Can't be bothered with pathetic people like you and that fool who posted that bull

[satpalahuja]

"All our Gurus had long hair and turbans "

sarpaanch - who told you this, who said so ? The tandoori chicken you ate last night told you so ?

[SaRpAnCh]

Common sense does

[satpalahuja]

Common sense does

Guru Gobind Singhji created the Khalsa, and then urged the faithfuls to keep their kesh. Does your common sense not tell you that our other 9 Gurus who were born before 1699 did not keep their Kesh ?

Kukdu koooo !!!!

[SaRpAnCh]

No it does not tell me ,as far as I am concerned all our Gurus wore turbans and kept their hair and also Guru Granth Sahib is not like worshipping an idol nor is it a book Bani Hai Guru Guru Hai Bani we do not blindly worship

[singhunit]

Common sense does

Worshipping a book is not different than praying to an idol! - is that not true ?

We bow before the 'book' - not the paper its printed on but the teachings which have been written by all, will you ever find a hindu 'book' with writings of any muslim saints?

As for hindus and idol worship - bowing before clay? Guru's had kept their kesh...for arguments sake even if they hadnt the pics arent as important as we do not before before them...thats what hindus do with idol worship.

Finally....pictures of hindu gods with many heads/elephant heads etc? However we still have respect for them....they just havent got space for us to listen to their teachings as its all superstition.

[buddasingh]

"All our Gurus had long hair and turbans "

sarpaanch - who told you this, who said so ? The tandoori chicken you ate last night told you so ?

Being glib is nice, but it’s half the story. Are you expressing your “own views” or ones “dug from the ground”

...In brief, History means 'to dig the ground, find something, explain half of it, and add your own views to the other half not explained'.....

Don’t leave us hanging. Tell us what you ate last night and what it told you so.

[Sewadar]

Gizza and Satpalahuja - Id disabled for 60 days

From Rules & Guidelines Page:

Insulting Sikhi, Shabad Guru, Khalsa Panth, Akal Takhat, Sikh identity and calling Sikhi a sect of any other religion will result in the user's ID being disabled for 60 days.