Jump to content

*seris Of Terror Attacks In Mumbai** Bomb Blasts Shootings Indian Sources Say @ Least 80 Dead


SaRpAnCh
 Share

Recommended Posts

The marriot was bombed by pasthun taliban jihadi's who are fighting pakistani rule and army. It seems like rouge elements (hameed gul ? who is a pro-kashmiri jihadi and has haterd for non-muslims http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Xyxjv6iDVlM http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=GuOUVwTM1zM) within ISI has given commando training and resources to pakistani/kashmiri jihadi's to deflect internal problems within pakistan and want to fight the arch enemy India by creating these kind of terorrist attacks. Therefore they achieve their aim of their muslims brothers not fighting their muslim brothers in NWFP but put their resources in fighting the Indian "kafirs". This is the mentality of military intelligence establishment of Pakistan. Thats why Sikhs would be wise not to side with Pakistan in any conflict but rather seek to see its destruction as pakistani military muslim establishment is no friend of the Sikhs.

Hameed gul and his like are the real ideologues who supply military training to jihadi terrorists, while the hate fuelled imaams supply the brainwashed foot soldiers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

not saying it wasn't muslims because it seems that the evidence points to that, but there is something that seems confusing:

The gunmen drank beer? If they were diehard jihadi's then why would they compromise their religious beliefs when there was no need to.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7752625.stm (cafe attack)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The gunmen were probably Hindus. One of the pics they released of one the gunmen, had a saffron colored cloth on his wrist. Muslims color is green. Saffron is either Sikhs or Hindus. It can't be Sikhs, so it is the Hindus.

They also drank beer, which a Jihadi Musulman wouldn't do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont think that Indian Intelligence services are very innocent compare to the ISI of pakistan.....the hotel bombings in pakistan could've been supported by the indian intelligence financially or any other way.....the ISI is pretty smart to figure out who has commited the acts......just like the indians figure out the pakistanis intelligence was involved......but the news is INDIA might even goto war against pakistan if they know for sure with hard evidence that pakistani intelligence services were involved then the sikhs and other separatist groups should take advantage of this war and start their own revolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The gunmen were probably Hindus. One of the pics they released of one the gunmen, had a saffron colored cloth on his wrist. Muslims color is green. Saffron is either Sikhs or Hindus. It can't be Sikhs, so it is the Hindus.

They also drank beer, which a Jihadi Musulman wouldn't do.

You have a point

http://www.kashmirwatch.com/showexclusives...news=value1news

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The gunmen were probably Hindus. One of the pics they released of one the gunmen, had a saffron colored cloth on his wrist. Muslims color is green. Saffron is either Sikhs or Hindus. It can't be Sikhs, so it is the Hindus.

They also drank beer, which a Jihadi Musulman wouldn't do.

You have a point

http://www.kashmirwatch.com/showexclusives...news=value1news

sounds like another conspiracy theory similar to one they had for 9/11 attacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the terrorists posed as Hindus as they set about their killing spree, wearing red dots on their foreheads and red threads around their wrists.

Kasav was one of the first to start shooting, picking off innocent men, women and children at Mumbai railway station, smiling as the body count mounted.

He and another of the gang then stole a Skoda car and drove to a beach popular with Bollywood film stars. His accomplice was shot dead by police. Kasav began revealing details of the plot after seeing the mutilated corpse of another terrorist.

As he was led away from the hospital after four hours of treatment he reportedly told medical staff: "Now I don't want to live."

Indian police have established that he speaks fluent English and is from Faridkot in Pakistan.

He told his interrogators that the gang left the Pakistani port of Karachi in a trawler. They were confronted by Indian coastguards, killing one and taking a second hostage.

Once close to their target they killed their hostage by cutting his throat and boarded three dinghies, landing under cover of darkness at Colaba jetty.

Kasav claims there were just 10 terrorists, who split into three groups and had orders to begin shooting at exactly 9.45pm.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/73571/...n-t-want-to-die

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once the bodies of the alleged terrorist are made public, and the captured terrorist is shown on tv. Sources in pakistan can verify if they do actually belong to pakistan or not. Then there will be no doubt who carried this out. Western intelligence agents are helping interrorgate the suspect so it wont be long before the truth is out.

And I dont think hindu hindutva terrorists would be stupid enough to want to murder people at random their own people, then try to blow up Indian historical buildings like the taj hotel. Their more likely to go for muslim targets and their buildings. This is definately the work of islamic jihadi's who have no care for the lives or property of India. They like publicity for their causes in big dramatic attacks to highlight causes or to "get even" with their enemy.

As much as we might hate the Indian congress party Indian govt and armies action against our people in 1980s and 90s we cant side with those who murder innocents in the name of their cause. No true Sikh nationalist who supports the idea of Khalistan would side with an islamic entity of pakistan or islamic jihadi organisations who needlessly hate all non-muslims rather, he would want to see the day of its destruction sooner so that Sikhs may say "raj kargeh khalsa" in liberating the holy land from non-sikh occuption.

Also killling of the jewish, what reason what hindu's have in killing the israeli's when they are their allies. It's time for Sikhs like you sarpanch and dal khalsa org to stop giving khalistan supporting Sikhs a bad name by siding with jihadi terrorist properganda. Rather than side with any sides version of events (hindu or islamic) Sikh interests and political aspirations should come first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use