Jump to content

Sikh Channel Requires Support!


Singh@
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I totally agree with AK47 transparency is the key.

But I think the most important aspect of this is responsibility, we already have many organisations acting to undermine Sikhi, the worst aspect of this is that these organisations are posing as Sikh institutions.

The undermining of Sikhi is overt and covert, open and secret. It could be a continuous attack on a small point or a onetime hit on a big level.

Example of continuous small attacks:

names on the bottom of Sikh Channel with cast distinctions (such an such Gill, Grewall ect) this makes it seem like its ok to believe in these things when it clearly is not.

Example of big attack:

Not acknowledging Shaheeds, distorting our history.

Every Sikh institution, organisation and person has a responsibility to Sikhi and its preservation. We must not misinform, distort or confuse we have a duty to the Panth.

Sikh channel have such an amazing opportunity to unite the Panth and the various Sikh Gurdwaras in the UK, Europe and even the world!!

Sikh channel needs to concentrate on unifying the message, history and philosophy of Sikhi in a way that is acceptable to all Sikhs, we don’t really have a lot of unity at the moment maybe Sikh channel can change this.

(also instead of trying to do everything in English it is important that we push the importance of Punjabi!!! Its ok that we give translations and speeches in English but we have to underline the importance of our MAH BOLI)

http://www.sikhstudentsfederation.com/video/damdama-sahib.html

Theres nothing wrong with names being run on the screen thats just acknowledgement of those who have helped,just like in ardass names are said,there is no caste issue there I have seen Jatt surnames Tharkhan Surnames and surnames from all so called Castes - this shows one thing at least that all SIKHS are commited to this channel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SIKH channel should attened the Mahan Shaheedi Smagam down the Midlands on July 5th just TWO POUNDS from each Sikh - and the target will be reached within a day,a similar event is being held in London Guru Nanak Sikh School later on in the month they could do the same there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sarpanch,

Firstly you are breaking the forum rules by quoting my whole post, max quote six lines.

Secondly you need to relax take some time out and really THINK about what you are saying before you post it for all the Sangat to see.

Let me make it clear:

I am NOT against Sikh Channel

I don't care if you give money and want to see your name (even though thats egomania)

THE CASTE SYSTEM HAS BEEN DEBUNKED AND OUTLAWED BY OUR GURUS

Khalsa meri jaat aur paat

oupmah khalsa jaat nah kehe

mehva eh paar nah lehi

"there is no caste issue there I have seen Jatt surnames Tharkhan Surnames and surnames from all so called Castes - this shows one thing at least that all SIKHS are commited to this channel"

How can you say there is no caste issue then say you have seen caste surnames that is the issue!!!!! why cant the Sikh Channel accept their responsibility when some manmukh calls in and says i wanna give 50 and see my name 'such an such Gill' or wateva why cant SIKH CHANNEL say:

We have no problem showing your name if thats what you want; but we cannot and will not show any jaat paat distinctions because it is against the very fundamentals of SIKHI.

Education and prevention in one sentence, Simples!

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the "surname" issue the biggest issue some people have with the Sikh Channel? Are you kidding me.

Does this over ride any potentional that a Sikh Channel has to offer? Right now I can say than many of my non-Gursikh family members and friends watch/listen to more Sikhi parchaar then they ever have in their whole lives. And that's thanks to a Sikh Channel. I will go as far as my brother-in-law has started keeping his kes since the end of May and he watches the Sikh Channel kathas most evenings. There's a massive intangible benefit here, those being nit-picky just because they think they have perfect Sikhi in their lives, need to understand that others will benefit from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main issues are:

Transparency of accounts (because money is coming from Sangat)

Clear up the whole 'Who owns what' scenario (because it could create something know as a conflict of interests, also we dont want anti Panthic forces becoming the mouth piece of the Sikh community)

Responsibility of Sikh Channel to portray PURE SIKHI (because ...well thats just obvious)

Unity of the Panth (because its very important!!)

Its not about nit picking although if you had nits in your hair i am 100% positive you would not leave them alone...

As i have said before Sikh Channel is in a very important position to help unify the Panth and

Sikh channel needs to concentrate on unifying the message, history and philosophy of Sikhi in a way that is acceptable to all Sikhs, we don’t really have a lot of unity at the moment maybe Sikh channel can change this.

Instead of selling out for a few donations and living month to month and always worrying about funds if the Sikh Channel worked to create UNITY and established a network of support from Gurdwareh they would run forever.

Also people should really read and try to understand other peoples posts before they start "nit picking"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main issues are:

Transparency of accounts (because money is coming from Sangat)

Clear up the whole 'Who owns what' scenario (because it could create something know as a conflict of interests, also we dont want anti Panthic forces becoming the mouth piece of the Sikh community)

Responsibility of Sikh Channel to portray PURE SIKHI (because ...well thats just obvious)

Unity of the Panth (because its very important!!)

To be honest my dear brother, the above points can be raised in reference to every Sikh Institute out there. Whilst I fully agree with above issues, I also believe that at this stage even mahan institutes like Sri Akal Takht Sahib has the above issues.

Sometimes we just need to move in a direction which will give some benefit to others. It may not meet the perfect criteria but it's one smaller step in the right direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Veer Ji

We agree yet disagree :)

You are absolutely right these problems are in all our major institutions, in some institutions these problems have been there from day one! In fact I would go as far as saying some institutions were created to cause divisions and keep the general population under control and misinformed!

we all know what (maf karna Sangat Ji) dirty badal is up to.

With Sikh Channel we have the opportunity to make a fresh start so why not do it properly. At least we can have one institution that is portraying the message of Sikhi in a way that is pure.

Sikh Channel is a major platform for us to mobilise and raise awareness about so many issues, that maybe one day we can exorcise all these demons dressed as Sikhs from the ranks of our leadership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surnames are not banned in Sikhism and I don't have a problem with people having surnames,we are meant to have Singh/Kuar i know and I agree that is what breaks the caste barrier downIf no one used Surnames it would be impossible to diffrentiate between Sikhs and it would be confusing.People just look for little things to cry about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use