Jump to content

Guru Nanak called a Devil on the BBC


Recommended Posts

what a joke. i think sikhs make themselves look really bad when they make a big deal about something like this because its just bakwaas. the person that made the comment clearly showed she didnt know what she was talking about cause she didnt even know guru nanak's name in the first place. i dont think thats anything to debate about its just a chuckle... also, just because what she had to say was offensive doesnt mean they should regret letting her speak. they should simply say how she's wrong and move to the next person. did anyone else just laugh when they heard guru nanak being compared to satan? i think some sikhs get offended too easily

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

wat setup? why are we making up scenarios and not accepting that its just some messed up girl. nothing more

Stop wasting time, BBC already apoligied and they aint gonna release her address etc, so we need to put our energy to other use.

I so agree with jessica, sometime i get the feeling that when we just start doing these email campgain withought thinking of the outcome, whether someting can be achieved or not form them, just makes us look like fool and people with too much time on their hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did anyone else just laugh when they heard guru nanak being compared to satan? i think some sikhs get offended too easily
yea because that was really funny wasnt it :wub:
just because what she had to say was offensive doesnt mean they should regret letting her speak.

she should regret what she said, so u think its ok to refer to our guru ji as a devil do u!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did anyone else just laugh when they heard guru nanak being compared to satan? i think some sikhs get offended too easily

yea because that was really funny wasnt it :wub:

just because what she had to say was offensive doesnt mean they should regret letting her speak.
she should regret what she said, so u think its ok to refer to our guru ji as a devil do u!

ya it was "<admin-profanity filter activated>" type of funny. just a one second chuckle. no i didnt say it was ok for her to say that just that its quite pointless to debate about it. u dont really need to worry about her regretting what she said because she can learn herself if she's willing to. it was enough to just say how she was wrong

that one time and then move on. worry about urself first

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

why should nothing be done? thats pretty sad when someone calls guru sahib the devil and then our own sikhs go and say no big deal. just laugh it off. sometimes you just gotta put your foot down and let people know that we wont take this kinda garbage. if you dont do anything, they gonna think, oh sikhs dont care lets rip them more.

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sat Sri Akal:

If the BBC staff defended the Sikh position and allowed other callers to defend the Sikh position, if BBC apologized for these comments being made on the air and to not allow that caller to be back on the show again, then I think the objective has been completed. What will added pressure to BBC do? They did seemingly everything possible to respond to that woman as quickly as possible and defended the Sikhs.

More pressure might make the BBC staff there get a bad impression of the Sikhs and perhaps next time, the BBC staff would not defend the Sikhs. And exactly what would this added pressure get us? What more can BBC do? If they can do something more, then fine, keep the pressure on. But if they cannot and have done everything they can, then this will only cause aggravation to both sides concerned.

The Sikhs got what they wanted and should consider this matter wrapped up.

If I am missing something, please add it in. If my comments are not to your liking, I apologize for offending you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

I think that some people here are taking this matter a bit too lightly. I agree with the posters who say that we should keep the pressure up on the BBC. These types of programmes aren't one offs. The BBC as well as Channel 4 in the UK are known well known for going out of their way to promote Islam. There have been countless Islamic propaganda programmes on these channels. The BBC multicultural department is dominated by Muslims. If one were to watch the output of this department you would think that there are only two religions in the UK, Christianity and Islam.

Some Sikhs think that just because the BBC has apologised and stated that they would not allow the person on air again should be the end of the matter. This displays an ignorance of just what is at stake here. The whole episode seems to a set up, not by the BBC but by Muslim organisations. Provocation is a well known trait of Muslims. They want to see how far they can provoke Sikhs before Sikhs react. The recent news item about the Muslim getting slapped up in a Baisakhi mela shows this trend. If Sikhs don't react and follow the advice of people who think that we should 'laugh it off' then we will get more and more Muslim plants making these types of comments.

If all Sikhs had chosen to take no action then there is no doubt that the BBC wouldn't have bothered to apologise. The actions of individual Sikhs as well as Sikh organisations has ensured that we got an apology, that BBC will think twice before allowing these types of comments to be made again and the general media has learnt that Sikhs are not prepared

to take Islamic attacks on their religion.

GurFateh

Bikramjit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use