Jump to content

Bbc's Sonia Deol Is Forced Off Facebook


Recommended Posts

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1243800/BBCs-Sonia-Deol-forced-Facebook-Sikhs-furious-TV-film.html

BBC's Sonia Deol is forced off Facebook by Sikhs furious over TV film

By Keri Sutherland

Last updated at 11:19 AM on 17th January 2010

A BBC News presenter has been subjected to a deluge of personal abuse after fronting a documentary about one of the most controversial events in recent Indian history.

Sonia Deol was forced to delete her page on the Facebook website amid a barrage of criticism from fellow Sikhs over her film about the Indian army storming the Golden Temple in Amritsar, one of the faith’s most holy shrines, in 1984.

Now protesters are planning a mass boycott of the licence fee in disgust at what they see as a slur on the controversial religious leader Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, who was killed in the raid.

Many Sikhs consider him a saint and are furious that in Ms Deol’s documentary, 1984: A Sikh Story, he was described as a militant.

They also claim he was depicted in the film in a similar way to Osama Bin Laden.

Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi ordered the assault on June 4, 1984, after Bhindranwale and up to 500 armed supporters took refuge in the holy site, apparently fearing arrest amid rising Sikh-Hindu tensions.

Around 500 people died in the ensuing battle, which some Sikhs now refer to as ‘our 9/11’.

As troops moved in, Bhindranwale’s followers fired missiles at Indian tanks.

The BBC has received 52 complaints about the documentary, which attracted 1.3 million viewers and was billed as Ms Deol’s ‘emotional journey back to India in a bid to discover how such an attack could ever have taken place’.

However, community TV station The Sikh Channel says it received more than 8,000 calls to a phone-in about the controversial film.

Channel owner Davinder Singh Bal said: ‘The documentary contained many sweeping statements and didn’t attempt to uncover the truth of what happened.

'Our viewers were not happy. BT said that our exchange was going into overdrive.

‘The BBC is not responding to the Sikh community and we are thinking about organising a campaign to invoke the non-payment of licence fees by the 700,000 Sikhs in Britain.’

Dr Sadhu Singh, chairman of the Council of Sikh Temples, said many viewers were angered that ‘the BBC showed him [bhindranwale] looking like Bin Laden’.

He said: ‘They used pictures of him wearing a turban and holding a gun. To someone who doesn’t know what Sikhism is about, it would be very misleading.

'Sikhs were attacked after September 11, but Sikhs are nothing to do with Bin Laden.

‘Some people are very upset that the documentary also showed Sonia Deol dancing with Hindus as if there is no problem between Hindus and Sikhs.

‘The feeling is still there that people who were responsible for 1984 have not been brought to justice.’

Ms Deol – who hosts BBC Breakfast at weekends and News 24 bulletins – deleted her Facebook profile onWednesday after the row escalated.

She told fans: ‘Time to shut this fan page down guys. Sorry. I know loadsof you have been superb, but a small minority have not understood what I am/am not in control of personally.’

In her introduction to the film, 36-year-old Ms Deol said Bhindranwale was ‘viewed as a militant who had terrorised for long enough’.

And she interviewed General Kuldip Singh Braer, who commanded the Indian forces that stormed the temple in what was known as Operation Blue Star.

The general, who also comes from a Sikh family, said of Bhindranwale: ‘He may have started out as a saint but he didn’t end as a saint.’

Operation Blue Star is believed to have led to the assassination of Mrs Gandhi, who was killed by two of her Sikh bodyguards four months after the attack.

Her death triggered three days of attacks on Sikhs across India, in which 3,000 people were killed.

A BBC source said Ms Deol’s documentary was never intended to be an investigation, saying: ‘It was her personal journey, a look at her reaction to rediscovering her faith as a Sikh.

‘It was for a mainstream channel, BBC1 and there’s only so much you can say in an hour.

'A lot of the attacks on Sonia have been because people think that the documentary reflected her views on Bhindranwale, but she did not give her opinions about him at all.

'She’s also had a lot of supportive comments.’

A BBC spokeswoman said: ‘1984:A Sikh Story was an authored personal journey through the eyes of a young British Sikh and included a range of contributors offering differing points of view.’

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this makes sikhs look so bad. sikh channel is not helpign at all. can we now let this issue go away or are we guna continue looking divided in public.

also i followed the sonia deol fan page and nothing out of the ordinary was s\id on it. it was people giving their opinions. she deleted it she said because she couldnt keep up with it. so clearly shes given the story to the papers and is getting lots of free publicity. why are we falling into her trap? the story has become sonia is a victim, when it should b about what happened 25 yrs ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She has not been forced off Facebook, just the Fan Page she created for herself.

Prior to its termination it had about 2000+ followers.

But seeing as she was constantly explaining herself, many people could have joined just to see what was being said, rather than show support?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats to UK Sikhs !

Congra\ts for what exactly? Have we shown humilty in this by putting a Sikh (Sonia Deol- Jaswinder Sidhu) off Sikhism alltogeter? The feeling getting from this post is that there are a few shouting and screaming like babies . Where is your Sikhism? If we react in anger have we controlled our 5 Chors. What do you think,?

Link to post
Share on other sites

how can you be "forced" off face-book??

She's a semi-pro reporter trying to advance her career, seeking publicity at every given oppertunity.

She was not singulary critisised, the whole of the BBc was. The reason she may have got it worse is because she LIED to the sangat on Sikh Channel.

She reminds me of those half-wit, failing celebs on BigBrother finding any excuse for publicity and attention.

Inevitably she will come up with a book or a documentary about how the whole thing scard her.. so she can make more money

using an 18year old spokesman- showing hindus and sikhs doing bhangra and suggested we have moved on????? SHAMELESS... OUR SCARS HAVE NOT HEALED!!!!

she should go back to bbc asian network and play some songs.. thats all shes good for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sonia deol cant be praised enough for the work she has done! seriously im not surprised its taken bbc 26 years to make an hour documentary on 84 considering the newer generation are so ungrateful and narrow minded. i feel personally feel embarrassed of all who are giving her a hard time! lay off and find a hobby or something *edited*!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest PunjabSingh

Congrats to UK Sikhs !

Congra\ts for what exactly? Have we shown humilty in this by putting a Sikh (Sonia Deol- Jaswinder Sidhu) off Sikhism alltogeter? The feeling getting from this post is that there are a few shouting and screaming like babies . Where is your Sikhism? If we react in anger have we controlled our 5 Chors. What do you think,?

I stand by my statement .

I have seen on the net,Sikhs abroad particularly in UK are very courageous.Others who are supporting Sonia Deol are doing so in the name of liberty,freedom of speech or commercial interests.

Enough is Enough.If some one attacks our house we cant keep quite .We keeping harping on Sikhi as being liberal or "sarbat daa bhalaa" which is the main essential of Sikhism.But if the other side is not reciprocating and is in fact trying to finish you off or is having bad intentions of women in your household .Will you keep quite ?

RSS soch is now not only in our religious institutions but also in our homes.The situation is much worse than you can imagine.

Cant you see Sonia Deol is not regetting what she has done .Instead she's blaming what she calls "a small minority" of people .Soon she will say that the small minority is doing for political reasons or personal reasons.

And as some one has said she's gathering matter for her future book in which again she will again claim that it was a small minority who was opposing here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are always blaming someone else. The RSS, BJP, Badal, Monay, Whitey, Hindus, Pakis, Sullay, BBC and on and on. Now it's Sonia Deol's turn. It's not anyone else...it's us. We are our own worst enemies. For so long we have been reading Bani, doing Simran, wearing Bana,... but what have we learned? All we've learned is to yell, swear, condemn, hurt, critisise, and divide. If an all white clean sheet is hung up infront of us but their is a small, tiny dirty stain on one of it's corners...and someone asks us "what do you see?" 9 out of 10 (me included) will SCREAM "A dirty sheet!" So what if this Sonia Deol doesn't have the same opinion about certain issues as I do...big deal. I'm guessing most people are upset because of the way Sant Baba Jarnail Singh Ji Mahanpurash was portrayed in the BBC piece. So what's new? Instead of hurling abuses at her which probably just reinforces to her and the rest of the world that "yes they are all hot heads" why not repond by calmy and peacefully correcting the misinformation? Maybe we can create our own documentary about The Blessed Jeevan of Santji and try to present it to the mainstream community? We've tried the protesting, screaming, abusing and it's never worked...for anyone! From what I saw, she seemed genuine about her own spiritual journey. But it seems to me, by our own personality faults and character flaws, it may even turn her away from becoming closer to the Panthic community. She may never realize just how great of Saint Babaji is. Instead of reactng so emotionally in the future lets remain calm and SHOW others that we are spiritual people. When a ripe orange is squeezed really hard, all that comes out of it is nothing but sweet nectar. That's just my 2 cents. Sorry for wasting everyone's time. Bhul Chuk Maaf karna

Vahiguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vahiguru Ji Ki Fateh

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are always blaming someone else. The RSS, BJP, Badal, Monay, Whitey, Hindus, Pakis, Sullay, BBC and on and on. Now it's Sonia Deol's turn. It's not anyone else...it's us. We are our own worst enemies. For so long we have been reading Bani, doing Simran, wearing Bana,... but what have we learned? All we've learned is to yell, swear, condemn, hurt, critisise, and divide. If an all white clean sheet is hung up infront of us but their is a small, tiny dirty stain on one of it's corners...and someone asks us "what do you see?" 9 out of 10 (me included) will SCREAM "A dirty sheet!" So what if this Sonia Deol doesn't have the same opinion about certain issues as I do...big deal. I'm guessing most people are upset because of the way Sant Baba Jarnail Singh Ji Mahanpurash was portrayed in the BBC piece. So what's new? Instead of hurling abuses at her which probably just reinforces to her and the rest of the world that "yes they are all hot heads" why not repond by calmy and peacefully correcting the misinformation? Maybe we can create our own documentary about The Blessed Jeevan of Santji and try to present it to the mainstream community? We've tried the protesting, screaming, abusing and it's never worked...for anyone! From what I saw, she seemed genuine about her own spiritual journey. But it seems to me, by our own personality faults and character flaws, it may even turn her away from becoming closer to the Panthic community. She may never realize just how great of Saint Babaji is. Instead of reactng so emotionally in the future lets remain calm and SHOW others that we are spiritual people. When a ripe orange is squeezed really hard, all that comes out of it is nothing but sweet nectar. That's just my 2 cents. Sorry for wasting everyone's time. Bhul Chuk Maaf karna

Vahiguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vahiguru Ji Ki Fateh

Vaheguru. Brilliant reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She was not forced but ran away from criticism. She definitely did not uphold the ideals of her profession by running away and hiding like a coward. Her job is meant for public scrutiny and she is answerable for her research and conduct. The fact that she just ran away means she no longer needs to answer questions to which she probably has no answer. Why go and become a mouthpiece for something if you have no knowledge about it? She went to Damdami taksal to learn about Bhindranwale, what it had to do with her journey as a Sikh i ask you? And by the way how was her childhood? And do you believe she is some kind of Joan of Arc? that we need her? for what? what difference has she made except making people talk! And it is not the people but the govts which decide course of action and they already know what they need to know. Period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's exactly what I'm talking about. We shouldn't react with knee-j erk emotional reactions. There's no need for cursing..it just makes us sound stupid and not dharmic. If we don't agree with someone lets try to understand where that person is coming from. If we treat someone with respect, PERHAPS (maybe, maybe not) they too will take the time to understand where we are coming from. It might sound simple minded but I think it's a very difficult yet a necessary lesson to learn, especially in our Panth today The Golden Rule: "Do unto others what you want them to do to you" which can also imply treat/talk/respond to others how you yourself would like to be treated/talked/responded to. Just like mama use to say, you can catch a lot more flies with honey than you can with vinegar. Peace, Love N' Rock N' Roll, Homies!!!! Actually... just Peace N Love Singho!!!

Gurfateh

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may add that i liked her documentary when i saw it for the first time. But it was clearly biased against Bhindranwale. The people who were giving history lessons on it included a cold blooded mass murderer who got away with crimes bigger than what he accuses Bhindranwale of clearly becoz he was a Govt man and lives to tell his story. Now Sonia showed bitter critic of Bhindranwale who was almost defeated by Bhindranwale had he not Tanks at his disposal, and whenn some critics ,although not that bitter they arnt killing her family members or raping her mother as was done in the streets of Delhi, criticise her she runs away by citing professional limits. She chose to be a mouthpiece of people of commited mass muders of people and got away, shall we take that she is really dumb or rather too smart?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with you. Who Santji is wasn't presented accurately in the documentary. I agree with what you are saying, I just think our methods of expressing our opinions don't need to be so angry or bitter. We can still get our points across firmly yet respectfully. I guarantee you more people from our own community and other communities will actually listen to what we have to say if we aren't yelling, stomping or cursing. Our SatGuruji who is Sada Ang Sang and is Parkash in our Hearts is complete SadChidAnand (Truth, Pure Consciousness, Ultimate Bliss) Svaroop. Let's stay connected to That, even when we are trying to get our views and opinions across to those we don't agree with. That's all I'm saying, Veerji. Sorry if I offened anyone.

Gurfateh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I miss my best pal. I was desolate when he passed away for quite a while (a few years!). Time (I found) does heal and attenuate the intensity of pain.  The busier you keep yourself, and thus from thinking about it, the better. You can't be stuck in constant grieving mode. The grief is heavily psychological, and you have to use a variety of tricks to focus elsewhere. Training helps. Keeping busy (as mentioned previously) helps. Hobbies help. Supportive friends who don't indulge you in excessive emotionality help. If you're going to mope about it for years, then you're not doing yourself any favours. You have to want to get over it, and not indulge in excessive emotionality after a while.  Even then, something will happen that brings them back to mind. But you have to keep moving. When the sun's out I always remember him, and what we'd get up to. I go past a place we used to go to (like a restaurant) and up he pops in my mind. But he's gone somewhere else now, and I'm here, and I have to deal with my own issues now. You have to be tough minded.  Try CBD btw.  
    • that sau sakhi tale is based on Guru Gobind Sigh's bachan after Singh was carried off battlefield unconcious and  injured by Musley and they cut his kesh and tried to convert him: bytrying to feed him  Halal Meat (please note those who think nothing of eating meat in 'halal friendly' eateries ) , doing sunat (circumcision) , reading shahada and even marrying/offering a muslim woman to him. Because he did not take the last option up Guru ji said he was NOT a muslim and could do pesh and rejoin his sikh bretheren.
    • https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/oct/18/pm-urged-to-enact-davids-law-against-social-media-abuse-after-amesss-death   Potentially an attack on our online freedoms. IF, this includes forums such as these, I will be very reluctant to post again   PM urged to enact ‘David’s law’ against social media abuse after Amess’s death Calls for crackdown on threats to public figures and an end to online anonymity   A notice keeps David Amess’s seat in the Commons free. Photograph: Jessica Taylor/AP   Jessica Elgot Chief political correspondent @jessicaelgot Mon 18 Oct 2021 19.59 BST             Boris Johnson is facing calls to enact “David’s law” to crack down on social media abuse of public figures and end online anonymity in the wake of the killing of Sir David Amess. Dozens of MPs paid tribute in the House of Commons on Monday to the veteran Conservative backbencher who was stabbed to death on Friday, shedding tears, sharing uproarious anecdotes and venting anger over his death.   While police are investigating whether there are any links to Islamist extremism and have not connected the killing to the targeting of MPs online, allies of Amess said he had voiced growing concern about threats and toxicity within public discourse as they demanded a crackdown. Campaigners have warned, however, that ending online anonymity could put whistleblowers and pro-democracy campaigners in authoritarian regimes at risk. Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, told the Commons that “civility in politics matters” but “we must not lose sight of the fact that David’s killing was an [alleged] act of terror on the streets of our country”. Mark Francois, who described Amess as one of his closest friends and his political mentor, vowed he would dedicate his time in parliament to overhauling the rules governing social media. Francois told the Commons he was “minded to drag Mark Zuckerberg [CEO of Facebook] and Jack Dorsey [CEO of Twitter] to the bar of the house … if necessary kicking and screaming so they can look us all in the eye and account for their actions or rather their inactions that make them even richer than they already are”. He said MPs should radically toughen up the pending online harms bill to prevent trolls and other abusers hiding behind pseudonyms. “In the last few years David had become increasingly concerned about what he called the toxic environment in which MPs, particularly female MPs, were having to operate in,” Francois said. “He was appalled by what he called the vile misogynistic abuse which female MPs had to endure online and he told me very recently that he wanted something done about it.”   A man understood to be Ali Harbi Ali is filmed on CCTV walking down a north London street last Friday. Photograph: Sky News Francois, the MP for Rayleigh and Wickford, which neighbours Amess’s Southend West constituency, added: “I suggest that if we want to ensure that our colleague didn’t die in vain, we collectively all of us pick up the baton, regardless of our party and take the forthcoming online harms bill and toughen it up markedly. “Let’s put, if I may be so presumptuous, David’s law on to the statute book, the essence of which would be that while people in public life must remain open to legitimate criticism, they can no longer be vilified or their families subject to the most horrendous abuse, especially from people who hide behind a cloak of anonymity with the connivance of the social media companies for profit.” Bernard Jenkin said MPs should also examine themselves when discussing civility in politics, a nod to some of the disturbing language used during Brexit debates. “Which of us has never felt fallen prey to feelings of contempt or lack of respect or unkindness towards those who oppose us? Which of us can honestly say we cannot do better?” He said kindness should be added to the seven principles of public life. “Henceforth, let kindness be known as the David Amess principle of public life.” Amess, an MP for 38 of his 69 years, was stabbed to death while holding his constituency surgery in an Essex church. Ali Harbi Ali, 25, was arrested at the scene and continues to be detained under terrorism laws. The government intends to pass an online safety bill introducing new obligations on social media companies to regulate illegal and harmful material – though there has been significant controversy over how that can be defined. Compliance will be monitored by Ofcom and the bill is expected to start its passage after pre-legislative scrutiny set to report back in early December. Paying tribute to “one of the nicest, kindest and most gentle individuals ever to grace these benches”, Johnson said Amess’s killing struck at the heart of the ordinary democratic work of MPs. “That Sir David spent almost 40 years in this house but not one day in ministerial office tells everything about where his priorities lay,” he said. “He was not a man in awe of this chamber, nor a man who sought patronage or advancement. He simply wanted to serve the people of Essex, first in Basildon, then in Southend. And it was in the act of serving his constituents that he was so cruelly killed.” Starmer said: “Even as a political opponent he was a man and a politician we could all learn much from. I use that phrase – ‘political opponent’ – very deliberately. Because David held his beliefs passionately but gently. I believe that not only can we learn from that but that we have a duty to do so. Civility in politics matters.” Starmer spoke to the parents of Jo Cox, the Labour MP murdered by a far-right terrorist in 2016, on Friday, he said. “I knew they would be reliving that terrible day. They said to me they were thinking of David’s family and how their lives would be changed forever,” he said. Cox’s widower, Brendan Cox, also said it was a moment to reflect on political discourse and a “day-to-day brutality with which our political debate is conducted, from increasingly regular death threats to online abuse”. The police team convened after his wife’s murder to investigate threats against MPs found 582 reports of malicious communications and handled 46 cases of harassment between 2016 and 2020, he said. Nine cases were classified as terrorism-related.
    • I have lost people in my life close to me. The feeling you have is emptiness.  The person filled a gap in your life which is missing.  In the modern world, we think of death of being separate from life, but it is in fact part of life. As you get older and you attend more funerals this is something you begin to accept. What death has taught me is that it is "finite" in this particular life that I am currently in now and I should be living it and live it better. If I live this life better and more fulfilled then I will either merge with the Akaal or live the next life at a better level.  Whatever Maharaj in his hukam has accepted for me is good. If I can leave this world accomplishing what I set out to prior to entering this life then I can leave this life with some level of Santhoki.  Your wife came into this world and set out to achieve whatever Maharaj in his hukam chose for her. She has achieved what she was set out to do and has moved to the next level. Cherish the moments you had with your wife. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use