Jump to content

Coventry Anti Gurmat Meeting - Dasam Granth, Nanakshahi Calender


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa! Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

They claim there has never been that much sangat at any event in the last 25 years, but there's more almost every weekend at many Gurudwara across the UK.

However, is it a good idea to give them more publicity by regularly bringing up the topic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa! Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

If you can answer the original question / request then please do so, but refrain from personal attacks.

dass wonders why k_z post which has no concrete evidence is allowed?

Isnt his post a personal attacks on others who are not forum users ? hence, unable to reply back to his allegations.

its obvious this is a "taksal" forum and has no place for regular sikhsangat.....any AKJ bashing thread is allowed to prolong.....if a thread related toTaksal's "claims" & idelogy are questioned(even they stand on MERE STORIES)...moderators come running to lock and discard it away!

look like the name of the site needs to be changed from sikhsangat.com to taksalsangat.com

am done with this place......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol. bebiha, i would like to point out that most on the mods on this forum are actually part of the jatha.

K_z only asked for audio and pics so we the sangat know what was said...so if anyone has the audio or pics pm him as requested or post on the net somewhere so all sangat can listen and see otherwise dont post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue is not of jatha or taksal.The issue is anti panthic agenda of some fake organizations.Coventry meeting was part of that.

The following is a proof of that.The agenda was to show support to Ragi Darshan singh. This is anti panthic act.Every sikh should condemn that.Panth is supreme.Organizations come afterwards.

27.01.2010%20-%20UK%20Confrence%2023.01.2010%20-%2003.jpg

27.01.2010%20-%20UK%20Confrence%2023.01.2010%20-%2004.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa! Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

If you can answer the original question / request then please do so, but refrain from personal attacks.

dass wonders why k_z post which has no concrete evidence is allowed?

Isnt his post a personal attacks on others who are not forum users ? hence, unable to reply back to his allegations.

its obvious this is a "taksal" forum and has no place for regular sikhsangat.....any AKJ bashing thread is allowed to prolong.....if a thread related toTaksal's "claims" & idelogy are questioned(even they stand on MERE STORIES)...moderators come running to lock and discard it away!

look like the name of the site needs to be changed from sikhsangat.com to taksalsangat.com

am done with this place......

There is no problem with finding out what happend or requesting for the audio - but why makes statements such as "Nindya of DT & Mahapursh" (as K_Z did to satrt off this topic) when you havent even heard it yet or were not there?

That's the problem - we hear/or see something on the net and we belive it. Lets stick to the facts and not hearsay or other peoples opinions - they become hearsay and chinese whispers....and ultimately nindya, which is anything that is not a fact!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa! Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

If you can answer the original question / request then please do so, but refrain from personal attacks.

dass wonders why k_z post which has no concrete evidence is allowed?

Isnt his post a personal attacks on others who are not forum users ? hence, unable to reply back to his allegations.

its obvious this is a "taksal" forum and has no place for regular sikhsangat.....any AKJ bashing thread is allowed to prolong.....if a thread related toTaksal's "claims" & idelogy are questioned(even they stand on MERE STORIES)...moderators come running to lock and discard it away!

look like the name of the site needs to be changed from sikhsangat.com to taksalsangat.com

am done with this place......

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa! Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

Bebiha Ji, please show me which allegations khalistan_zindabad has made in his post? I actually listened to the meeting and can't believe that anyone would see it as a good thing.

This has nothing to do with Jathas, but with the traditions and very sources of Sikhi.

Please show me an example of an "AKJ bashing thread" being allowed to continue.

Guru Rakha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use