Jump to content

Coventry Anti Gurmat Meeting - Dasam Granth, Nanakshahi Calender


Recommended Posts

Matheen Jee,

This is my last post on Sikh Sangat. The fact is he does he has done it for years whether hear or on other forums, he used to do it on tapoban too. I am actually suprised you or another admin member deleted my post. It was no personal attack on him. I did not slander him, just the fact of what I have been seeing for years. I am not a child or a teenager who dis-respect other gursiklh whether they be DDT, Nanaksar, Nihung I agree to live with amongst other who have a different school of thought. Over the last couple of months. I have come to a conclusion (from what I have witness here) that Sikh sangat forum is NOT for all of the sangat. I have seen K_Z adding masalla to topics everytime and he gets away with it. There was no need to keep adding 'doing nindia of DT or maha pursh' he could have just stated has anybody got the audio from sat cross roads meeting. Its quite clear that little bit is to cause or put more petrol on the fire. K_Z stated himself that they would rather not try to resolve the matter in a previous post (I dont see piaar here or attempting to make things better). You keep his post, however deleted mine. Tell me what was wrong in my post?

I stated about building birdges, both sides doing vichaar together, attempting to get out of this circles of both sides fighting as it would be the downfall of us I stated their is an old rehit that a Sikh should not sleep without resloving his dispute with another Sikh. Is that so bad? or maybe Sikhsangat does not want this to happen. It is clear you allow his or other post that slander Jatha on for longer however questioning, taksaali members, or their beliefs or anything that someone from taksaal getting upset, you delete straight away. Posts disrespecting any gursikh despit whatever jathebandi is from should be deleted immediately.

The fact is, Sikhsangat is pro taksaal and anti Akhand Keertani Jatha, yet you have to keep stating 'no, rest of AKJ is ok just AKJ UK'. Just an excuse ! So called singhs belonging to Taksaal put up posts making lies about Bhai Sahib and allowed on, that is more proof of what moderators or Sikhsangat is by allowing it.

SIkhsangat has lost its respect it used to have. All I see everysingle day people slandering gursikhs. This should be called nindia.com. There is no piaar here. This forum has caused a bigger rift between gursikhs.

I will not use this forum again, and Im sure many others will stop too. There seem to be much better forums that teach about Sikh history, paath etc.

You have become a dissapointment.

Apologies if I have offended

VaahegurooJeeKaaKhalsaa VaahegurooJeeKeeFatehh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa! Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

Veer Ji, sorry you feel that way, let me try to respond to your post.

Matheen Jee,

This is my last post on Sikh Sangat. The fact is he does he has done it for years whether hear or on other forums, he used to do it on tapoban too. I am actually suprised you or another admin member deleted my post.

Your post had no relevance to the topic. He asked for a audio recording or for photos. No jatha was mentioned. In fact, as far as I know, the meeting wasn't an AKJ event, so how can any criticism of it be seen as criticism of the AKJ?

It was no personal attack on him. I did not slander him, just the fact of what I have been seeing for years.

That may be so, but how is it relevant to this topic? Your comments were of a personal nature and directed to him - you should use the PM feature for that. If you can point out recent threads where attacks on any Jathebandi have been allowed, please do so. We keep a log of all reports that reach us - not one, (since I've has access to them) has been a complaint about jatha bashing.

There was no need to keep adding 'doing nindia of DT or maha pursh' he could have just stated has anybody got the audio from sat cross roads meeting.

That is your opinion, and I would probably have left that line out too, however it is a factual statement so don't see what the problem is. The nindya was done by a person, not by a jatha.

The fact is, Sikhsangat is pro taksaal and anti Akhand Keertani Jatha, yet you have to keep stating 'no, rest of AKJ is ok just AKJ UK'. Just an excuse ! So called singhs belonging to Taksaal put up posts making lies about Bhai Sahib and allowed on,.....

Veer Ji, please show me a single post where any moderator has made that statement, or where lies about Bhai Sahib have been allowed? Those are pretty serious allegations, so it is only fair that the proof is provided.

Have you ever reported the posts you find objectionable?

Guru Rakha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use