Jump to content

Shaheed Bhai Harminder Singh Sandhu Zindabad


B.S.S.F
 Share

Recommended Posts

thats the same thing they said about sodhi and all the other top singhs that were killed.......it was the agents that got them killed because they knew how dangerous they were!!

harminder singh sandhu was a true shaheed

you clearly don't know what your talking about.

from what i know harminder singh sandhu was very close with sant jarnail singh and bhai amrik singh and was openily known to demand khalistan when he was leader of aissf, he also spent time in jail....my thinking is......if he was a traitor they why would indian gov put him behind bars!!

regardless of where we get our info from.....the truth is that niether of us will ever know the truth and be able the entangle everything about 1984 and after....who was an agent and who wasnt.....we wernt there and we'll only hear info from others....and never anything with any solid foundation....because there was never any untiy for the cause then and there isnt now...thats why theres so many conflicting stories!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Bhai Sodhi, Bhai Amrik singh, Sandhu, Sant Bhinderanwale were in present in mostly all of meetings and it was sandhu who was leaking out mostly everything. For example, in one meeting : sant ji, amrik singh and sandhu was told of a plan to send some singhs to particular place at particular time to do some job and before the singhs reached the spot.. police were waiting for them to come (trap) and singhs were killed. That event made sant jee and other sure who was the snitch but was too late to do anything as govt' attacked darbar sahib.

what a load of rubbish! sandhu was always wiv sant ji. if sant ji knew sandhu had committed treason, he would have had him dealt with starightaway.

what you have posted is something that youhave just made up yourself. particluar this, particular that, sounds like bull$hit !

you should know better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what S1ngh has said is tru, the plan was to sen a jeep of singhs from Harmandhir sahib to mehta, the only people who knew about this were Shaheed Baba Jarnails singh, Shaheed Bhai Amrik singh, and Harminder Singh Sandhu. en route to mehta the jeep was ambushed and Bhai Swaran Singh Rode, who was in the jeep became shaheed and the other singhs were badly injured. some singhs said, lets finish sandhu of but baba jarnail singh ji said no, as this would cause friction amongs the kharkoo's as many singhs had 100% faith in harminder singh sandhu. its not jus made up, like i said in the other thread, theres many ex-kharkoos u can ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what a load of rubbish!

killing bhatia and trying to kill gurcharan singh of the akali dal would mean there was open war between Sant Ji and Akali Dal but did Sant ji say "dont say anything to these 2 becos it will cause friction?"

If this Swarn Singh is the same one who was the relative of Sant Ji and the one who killed lala, then he became shaheed in operation bluestar not in this particluar incident.

sounds like these ex-kharkoos still have a lot of jealousy if they still peddling this rubbish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my bad i meant Hardev singh rode, not Swaran Singh, sorry about that. bhatia and gurcharan singh had no kharkoo following, sandhu had alot. and this would have caused a divide in the federation and the movement as a whole, if Baba Jarnail singh ji orderded him to be killed. the murder of DIG atwall, which is blamed on Baba Jarnail SIngh ji, was done by harminder singh sandhu, atwal used to get info from sandhu, but when sandhu feared he would get found out he had atwal killed outside Harmandhir Sahib. this is not all, sandhu also revealed the details of 45 pending cases agains General Labh singh to the cops. it was General Labh singhs order to kill him once he became public. Labh Singh said "if he comes out in public whilt im alive, he wont lasy a week" sandhu did not come out in public untill after General Labh Singh became shaheed. Sandhu's dream was to be CM of punjab, in anyway possible. Rajinder singh mehta's was to be jathedar of Akaal Takhat or head of SGPC, and Amarjit singh chawala's was to be cabinet minister, which he has achived now. and mehta is an executive member of SGPC now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sandhu's dream was to be CM of punjab, in anyway possible.

lol. and the way to go about being that was to support a complete seperation from India? come off it geezer!

the atwal incident hapened in april 83, a whole 14 months before bluestar. if Sant Ji wanted to deal with sandhu he could have. EASILY!

the fact is that up to the end Sant Ji never said anything about him. that tells me more than any jealousy-minded people can. no matter what their conttribution to the panth. If waht General Labh Singh said was correct, why did Bittu, who was very close to Labh Singh, say that the murder was wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KH4L1$T4N1 you got your info mixed up in parts, it wasnt Sandhu that General Labh Singh was referring to, it was a police tout, who was in their own organization.

However, its widely accepted with Jujharoo's circles that Sandhu was an agent, whether its true or not is for sangat to research and decide. Keep in mind that Sandhus wife was Shaheed in bluestar, family protection is a priority for traitors, why wasn't this the case here? There was a large element of doubt placed on Sandhu, which is why they had him killed. Gurjit Singh Kaka (SSF) & many other Singh's where also suspected of being agents. The govt played us well.

PS: Bhai Gurmukh Singh Nagoke (KCF) completed the hit on Sandhu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a tout, everyone excepts it apart from bssf - is this another publicity stunt? if so its not going as well as the gold medal support of babbu mann.

Wasnt it agreed by sarbat khalsa and 5 member panthic commitee that he was a tout to do not have any affiliations with him?

There was problems between him and general labh singh - one of the older singhs confirmed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a tout, everyone excepts it apart from bssf - is this another publicity stunt? if so its not going as well as the gold medal support of babbu mann.

Wasnt it agreed by sarbat khalsa and 5 member panthic commitee that he was a tout to do not have any affiliations with him?

There was problems between him and general labh singh - one of the older singhs confirmed it.

Thats not the first time I seen you take a shot at BSSF....wisen up bro. There where a lot of Singh's who had problems with other Singh's and Jathebandis in movement, now you wouldn't like it if we talked about how Taksal called Baba Manochahal a sarkari agent would you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use