Jump to content

Chairs


good
 Share

Recommended Posts

Wjkk wjkf ,we need help !

I am a Sikh from Edinburgh and we have 8 red cinema style seats with cup holders in the Darbar Sahib!

What can we do to get them removed. pls Help us!

Its not a laughing matter but when you stated the seats had cup holders, I cracked up!!! Sorry.....

But seriously they could be for disabled people or elderley members of the congregation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good,

you need to get organised. First get as many people who are like minded then set an approach that first asks the committee why the seats are there, any chairs need to be outside the darbar sahib.

First we had chairs, now we have cinema style seats with cup holders, we have also heard of a sofa in the darbar sahib, we fools are on a slippery slope, just like the masands.

Soon the cup holders will have cups of tea, because the person sitting in the chair cannot get up !!!!

People will be slouching in the sofas infront of Akaal Saroop Guru Granth Sahib Ji

These are truly dark times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In colder climates as people age, joint problems that our forefathers never dealt with have now become high number with many health problems where the older person cannot sit on the ground due to knee/osteopathic/hip/joint problems etc. Are they to be shunned from the Gurdwara? If it's 8 seats at the back of the hall it is most likely for such people with these issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Bundha - I suppose its best to get rid of them altogether.

Although I do wonder how disabled people or the elderly can be part of the sangat. Any suggestions? I see some Gurudwara's have TV screens in the langar hall which beam pictures from upstairs. However that's not the same as being part of the actual sangat is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Gurdwara I know has box type seats at the back and disabled and very old people on crutches use them regularly. I see no problem with this.

If aamh people try using them, then pull them up about it if it bothers you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a number of things you can do.

Just have the benches outside the darbar sahib. A gurdwara near us has done this, with cushion benches and heaters blowing warm air, very comfortable.

Why not make a long dug out at the back of the darbar sahib, fit benches and carpet it properly and maybe add heating so that the elderly can sit in darbar sahib but at the same level as the rest of the sangat.

Have them seated in a room next to the darbar sahib but have large windows for full view and speakers for sound.

There are many things that can be done, but we do not think it through, we now have sofas and cinema chairs, what next ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it me or is this becoming more and more of an issue in recent times? I wonder how this situation of people not being able to sit on the floor was dealt with back in the days or even nowadays in India. I haven't seen a Gurdwara in India that have cinema seats in the darbar hall!!! There will be some legit people who have problems sitting on the floor and there will be other who will act/think they have problems, but they are only fooling themselves!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally feel it depends on the persons physical abiltiy. What would our Guru JI's do if someone was incapable of sitting on the floor, reject them from darbar sahib? How about someone in a wheelchair young disabled or old bajurgh? Are they not allowed darshan of maharaj? Even if they had all the sharda and goodwill in the world, proper decent people, as they were incapable of of sitting on the floor or getting out of their wheelchair, we would deny them the right to enter and do darshan (homage) to baba ji's hazoori?

If its a king who has akaar (ego) and feels its his right to sit on a throne then yeah, give um a slap.

But those who can't physically and you deny them or make them feel akward by sitting at the back well think for yourself. By the way alot of people who look healthy but have back problems and can't sit on the floor but on a chair also reject them? Also why are the kirtani jatha allowed to sit at a higher level on a stage than the sangat? Not higher than Maharaj but the incapacitated sangat members are also at a level lower than baba ji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The placement of chairs in Darbar Sahib gives way for manmat people to sit on chairs and disrepect Guru Sahib. Then if the person is approached and questioned, why doesn't he sit on the ground like rest of the sangat. He/she will disregard the person and say i can't, when it's completely visible the person can. This would cause a conflict and escalate into problems. So to avoid dilemmnas like this, the Gurdwaras should not put any chairs in Darbar Sahib. What they should do is put wheelchairs in the back, out of Darbar Sahib and when an old person who is unable to sit on the ground can take one and wheel it in. He/she can take a spot against one of the walls, where he/she is not directly infront of the other sangat.

Fat people complain all the time that they can't sit on the ground. Should they be allowed to sit on the chairs, due to their own selfish behavior of stuffing their faces. What about those that will bring up excuses of I got a bad knee. I can't sit for to long on the ground. I got a bad hip, I got a bad ankle, I got etc, etc. The excuses are not going to end.

The kirtan jatha. Are those that sitting on chairs, educating the sangat about Sikhi? This is a long held tradition that the person that is telling you a about Gurmat or giving you wisdom, sits higher than the learner. It's about giving respect and instilling values.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use