Jump to content

Facial Hair Removal : Jagir Kaur Continues To Stir Controversy


Guest G.Kaur
 Share

Recommended Posts

If that is the case that A Sikh is someone who follows ALL the commands of Guru Sahib then, the Amritdhari that doesn't wake up at Amritvela is just as bad as her. I personally dont care about this women and the fact that she killed her own daughter is probably my main reason.

What we need to understand that men will never understand the struggle that a women faces when it comes to facial hair, not just the fact that a woman with facial hair is considered abnormal in society but im sure even amongst those men that preach about women should keep hair and ridicule them if they don't is hypocrisy, i doubt anyone of them would want to marry a women with facial hair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is the case that A Sikh is someone who follows ALL the commands of Guru Sahib then, the Amritdhari that doesn't wake up at Amritvela is just as bad as her. I personally dont care about this women and the fact that she killed her own daughter is probably my main reason.

What we need to understand that men will never understand the struggle that a women faces when it comes to facial hair, not just the fact that a woman with facial hair is considered abnormal in society but im sure even amongst those men that preach about women should keep hair and ridicule them if they don't is hypocrisy, i doubt anyone of them would want to marry a women with facial hair.

Good points, and may I add that there are Singhs out there who do understand the struggle a Bibi has to face. In fact, at one point in the past I had read about certain Singhs who had decided to marry Bibis with facial hair. So yes, there are still such Singhs out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my thoughts on this may not be valued but i feel jagir kaur should not have got rid of the tache. I mean she's like a middle aged women who had a position of authority in the community. I don't understand why she did it as its not like no one would have noticed.

Obviously all who take amrit should adhere to the rehit. But for some if it makes sense, it is easier to not be affected by mainstream culture. Jagir Kaur lived in Sikh majority society all her life, middle aged women who's amritdhari so no one really is going to make her feel uncomfortable about the tache. I mean she's married and had kids.

But compare her to a young women / late teenager in UK or anywhere in west. In a society obsessed with looks it would be SO hard for a girl to have the high personal esteem and confidence in oneself if she had a lot of facial hair. I can imagine the difficulties involved. The remarks or thoughts would be the same amongst people of all denominations and sexes. She would feel like an outsider. Lets be honest in western society actually even eastern women with facial hair are not the norm.

Basically guys who have partners will know. Women are naturally hairy like all humans i.e. man. Less so than men but still not like you see in the media. Asian especailly Punjabi women are fair and have black hair so it shows up more so. It is very normal for women to have sideburns, upper lip hair and thick eyebrows (obvoiusly all have hairy legs and arm pits). But apart from amritdhari women most try to not show those hairs. Either by removing or using jolen etc.

Im not amritdhari, actually im the complete opposite - mona ex- smoker never had interest in religion up until a couple years ago - but am in baby steps going towards my guru, but sorry to sound like a hypocrite but honestly i have no ill will to women with visable facial hair, but this sounds so nasty sisters please forgive me but its HONEST, maybe when im an old man but at the moment if my missus didn't wax and thread i'd not find her attractive (BTW she is not born sikh). SORRY if that makes me sound so wrong but it is true. I mean lads on here who are amritdhari would you prefer too marry or even want to marry a female with a moustache and large side burns, mono brow or even a few on the chin? HONEST answers only. Also if you are married in this situation, did you prefer not too or were you happy with it, or did you not have a choice in saying no?

Look im not trying to put our sisters down im just being honest from my point off view. Please don't give me a lesson on Sikhi. I know cutting / removing hair is wrong.

But i'm just asking a question and want honest replies.

T his might be going slightly off topic but it is justifiably related so im just asking for HONEST opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ gurdssingh - You make some very honest points, and whilst they may not be to everyone's liking, they are representative of the reality facing people today.

But I always return to the central issue that if one is serious about Sikhi (and adhering to its tenets 100%), then societal pressures, Western perceptions, etc., are all secondary. I know how very easy it is to say this - and I'm not stating I'm perfect - but a true Sikh (which I am not at the moment, but DO hope to be eventually) would say that if our ancestors gave their heads for Sikhi, a few stray hairs here and there are not that important in the long-run. But again, as I said previously its much more difficult to adhere to certain practices when the world is always judging you for one thing or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geo, *

look at maryada and then maybe you will understand no removing or dying kesh anywhere on your body. What is the point of taking amrit if your gonna do stuff like this.

People like you are the problem, and thats why bibiya do stuff like this as they feel men judge them too much for having kesh. If guys were more supportive it may not be such a problem. Also if people didnt take amrit for a joke.

Whatever guru ji says we must accept not question and then think upon it and then maybe accept it.

Also to add we have far to much to worry about in the panth, than how a bibi looks with or without kesh. Maharaj blessed us with kesh so get over it and lets make a jeevan for ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Umm, that's totally irrational, bro. There are plenty of prakash-dara Singhs in Punjab (less than we'd like, but still plenty). No one cares that you are sabat soorat. It isn't 1986. You can walk around in chola, kurta-pajama, or jeans. Whatever. If you want the look @dallysingh101 is referring to, just go into a cheap clothing shop (not a Western-style mall) and buy some shirts for 250 rupees or a track suit for 2000 rupees. You'll get the cheap stuff made in some sweatshop in Bombay.
    • The Mind is Jyot Saroop (Waheguru), but the mind is under the influence of five evils… Through Naam Simran( Rememberance), the mind will begin to detach from evil, and get back to its original form ( MANN TU JYOT SAROOP HEH)… Until the mind breaks free from the five evils, one will go through the cycle of paap and punn….which leads to Karma… Naam Simran destroys past karma, and prevents new karma coming into fruition… I did this, I did that… This non realisation of the Jyot Saroop gives rise to paap and Punn, which in turn gives birth to suffering and misery…
    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use