Jump to content

Vaheguru Mantra


Kalsingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

<br />Pray Truth for all and say Satsriakaal,<br />Dear all and Mohkam Singh Jee,<br /><br />All that flows through the Guru is eternal verity.<br /><br />A preacher's explanation never tallies with truth.<br /><br /><br />Balbir Singh<br />
<br /><br /><br />

Khalsa Ji

What does a preacher's explanation tally with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pray Truth for all and say Satsriakaal,

Dear all and SantLUCIFER Jee,

You wrote "I'm guessing you're a Namdhari or Nirankari....[other cult/sect...] "

The true Guru Arjan Dev Jee is confirming it.

ਨਾਮ ਕੇ ਧਾਰੇ ਸਗਲੇ ਜੰਤ ॥

नाम के धारे सगले जंत ॥

Naam ke dhaare sagle jant. SGGS Ang 284-11

Have you still to realize that you are a Jant (creature) and based on Naam (Naamdhaaree)?

Please listen. Guru Naanak Dev Jee is singing.

ਸਬਦੁ ਬੀਚਾਰਿ ਭਏ ਨਿਰੰਕਾਰੀ ॥

सबदु बीचारि भए निरंकारी ॥

Sabadu beechaari bhae nirankaaree. SGGS Ang 904-3

May I ask? When will you become nirankaaree?

*****

Further you wrote "Satguru is Waheguru. When the Guru Sahibs were here they were the Satgurus . . . Currently Shri Guru Granth Sahib is the Guru . . ."

May I ask where the Guru Sahibs, the Satgurus have gone?

Then you referred the Guru's Vaak "Satguru mera sada sada, na avai na javai. [True Guru is forever and ever, he neither comes, nor goes] this attribute can only be affliated with Waheguru".

Please explain this. Who got birth as the Guru Sahibs and were here as Satgurus?

*****

Mohkam Singh Jee,

A true receiver begins to praise the Naam and the truth.

A preacher remains an imitator. His explanations are borrowed and never experienced. He is a liar and always off the track.

Balbir Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pray Truth for all and say Satsriakaal,

Dear all and SantLUCIFER Jee,

You wrote "I'm guessing you're a Namdhari or Nirankari....[other cult/sect...] "

The true Guru Arjan Dev Jee is confirming it.

ਨਾਮ ਕੇ ਧਾਰੇ ਸਗਲੇ ਜੰਤ ॥

नाम के धारे सगले जंत ॥

Naam ke dhaare sagle jant. SGGS Ang 284-11

Have you still to realize that you are a Jant (creature) and based on Naam (Naamdhaaree)?

Please listen. Guru Naanak Dev Jee is singing.

ਸਬਦੁ ਬੀਚਾਰਿ ਭਏ ਨਿਰੰਕਾਰੀ ॥

सबदु बीचारि भए निरंकारी ॥

Sabadu beechaari bhae nirankaaree. SGGS Ang 904-3

May I ask? When will you become nirankaaree?

*****

Further you wrote "Satguru is Waheguru. When the Guru Sahibs were here they were the Satgurus . . . Currently Shri Guru Granth Sahib is the Guru . . ."

May I ask where the Guru Sahibs, the Satgurus have gone?

Then you referred the Guru's Vaak "Satguru mera sada sada, na avai na javai. [True Guru is forever and ever, he neither comes, nor goes] this attribute can only be affliated with Waheguru".

Please explain this. Who got birth as the Guru Sahibs and were here as Satgurus?

*****

Mohkam Singh Jee,

A true receiver begins to praise the Naam and the truth.

A preacher remains an imitator. His explanations are borrowed and never experienced. He is a liar and always off the track.

Balbir Singh

it appears embedding does not work? please take 27 ish seconds out of your life to watch please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pray Truth for all and say Satsriakaal,

Dear all and SantLUCIFER Jee,

You wrote "I'm guessing you're a Namdhari or Nirankari....[other cult/sect...] "

The true Guru Arjan Dev Jee is confirming it.

ਨਾਮ ਕੇ ਧਾਰੇ ਸਗਲੇ ਜੰਤ ॥

नाम के धारे सगले जंत ॥

Naam ke dhaare sagle jant. SGGS Ang 284-11

Have you still to realize that you are a Jant (creature) and based on Naam (Naamdhaaree)?

Please listen. Guru Naanak Dev Jee is singing.

ਸਬਦੁ ਬੀਚਾਰਿ ਭਏ ਨਿਰੰਕਾਰੀ ॥

सबदु बीचारि भए निरंकारी ॥

Sabadu beechaari bhae nirankaaree. SGGS Ang 904-3

May I ask? When will you become nirankaaree?

*****

Further you wrote "Satguru is Waheguru. When the Guru Sahibs were here they were the Satgurus . . . Currently Shri Guru Granth Sahib is the Guru . . ."

May I ask where the Guru Sahibs, the Satgurus have gone?

Then you referred the Guru's Vaak "Satguru mera sada sada, na avai na javai. [True Guru is forever and ever, he neither comes, nor goes] this attribute can only be affliated with Waheguru".

Please explain this. Who got birth as the Guru Sahibs and were here as Satgurus?

*****

Mohkam Singh Jee,

A true receiver begins to praise the Naam and the truth.

A preacher remains an imitator. His explanations are borrowed and never experienced. He is a liar and always off the track.

Balbir Singh

Khalsa Ji

Who is the true receiver?

Is the true reciever not a preacher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pray Truth for all and say Satsriakaal,

Dear all and Mohkam Singh Jee,

A true receiver is the person who has received true Naam exactly as the Gurus have suggested in Sri Guru Granth Saahib Jee. True Gurus have not once suggested that Vaheguru is the Gurmantra.

A true receiver sings the results of Naam.

Preaching is a fake business (dhandhaa).

A preacher may also become a true receiver of Naam with God's Grace.

Balbir Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mohkam Singh Jee,

Thanks for your efforts. Please provide one Vaak from the true Gurus confirming that Satigur is Sri Guru Granth Saahib Jee.

Balbir Singh

ਸਬਦੁ ਗੁਰੂ ਸੁਰਤਿ ਧੁਨਿ ਚੇਲਾ ॥

Sabadh Guroo Surath Dhhun Chaelaa ||

सबदु गुरू सुरति धुनि चेला ॥

The Shabad is the Guru, upon whom I lovingly focus my consciousness; I am the chaylaa, the disciple.

1 ਰਾਮਕਲੀ ਗੋਸਟਿ (ਮ: ੧) ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ : ਅੰਗ ੯੪੩ ਪੰ. ੧

Raag Raamkali Guru Nanak Dev

Khalsa Ji

Shabad is the Guru , surat {the act of remembering} is the chela {Sikh}.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pray Truth for all and say Satsriakaal,

Dear all and Mohkam Singh Jee,

Thanks for referring the wonderful Vaak from Guru Naanak Dev Jee.

ਸਬਦੁ ਗੁਰੂ ਸੁਰਤਿ ਧੁਨਿ ਚੇਲਾ ॥

सबदु गुरू सुरति धुनि चेला ॥

Sabadu Guroo Surati Dhuni Chelaa. SGGS Ang 943

I know many people who have Gutkaas, Pothees and Sanchiaan at home. Some have the printed Sri Guru Granth Sahib Jee also. Many others have electronic copies of Sri Guru Granth Saahib Jee in computers. Do you feel the consciousness of these family members has started following the Sabad Guru?

May I ask if the Sabad is a printed book or the collection of all words of a book?

Please seek to receive true Naam Simran. You may also come to know the reality of jooniaa preachers.

Balbir Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<br />Pray Truth for all and say Satsriakaal,<br />Dear all and Mohkam Singh Jee,<br /><br />Thanks for referring the wonderful Vaak from Guru Naanak Dev Jee.<br />ਸਬਦੁ ਗੁਰੂ ਸੁਰਤਿ ਧੁਨਿ ਚੇਲਾ ॥<br />सबदु गुरू सुरति धुनि चेला ॥<br />Sabadu Guroo Surati Dhuni Chelaa. SGGS Ang 943<br /><br />I know many people who have Gutkaas, Pothees and Sanchiaan at home. Some have the printed Sri Guru Granth Sahib Jee also. Many others have electronic copies of Sri Guru Granth Saahib Jee in computers. Do you feel the consciousness of these family members has started following the Sabad Guru?<br />May I ask if the Sabad is a printed book or the collection of all words of a book?<br /><br />Please seek to receive true Naam Simran. You may also come to know the reality of jooniaa preachers.<br /><br /><br />Balbir Singh<br />
<br /><br /><br />

Khalsa Ji

I do not have the knowledge about whether certain people follow shabad Guru or not. You would have to ask them directly. Khalsa Ji what is your definition of "true Naam Simran?"

Khalsa Ji what are "jooniaa preachers?

Khalsa Ji shabad is Guru. Shabad can be in the form of text written in a Granth. Shabad can be in the form of digital encoding on electronic devices. Shabad can be in the form of the written word in pothis etc.

Khalsa Ji neither Guru nor Sikh are physical entities. Guru is shabad and Sikh is surti ( focus). Shabad can also be memorised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ik i'm a few (13) years late but basically: Get a single Mal-mal dastar (around 3-5 metres) and starch it. You just whisk 2 ladles of starch (Kershaw's, cornstarch or maida) with around 5 cups of water until it's completely smooth and mix it on low heat flame for around 20 mins until it goes clear and think like water. When this cools off, take a clean but damp turban and soak it into the starch and make sure you coat the whole dastar evenly You leave it out to hang dry in the sun/air. Once dry u can store it in a cool, dry place until you wanna tie it (for about 4 months) Take the dastar, sprinkle some water all throughout the turban to make it slightly wet and just soft enough to tie. Then you and another person hold the dastar at each end to make a stretched rectangle (two people holding one corner in each of their hands). Fold it in half width-wise 3 times. Tie the turban like this quite loosely. The starch will make it tighter as it dries BUT TIE IT STAIGHT ONTO YOUR HEAD. NO MINi-TURBAN BENEATH IT. JUST TIE YOUR FLATTENED JOORA ON TOP OF YOUR HEAD AND THE DASTAR DIRECTLY ON TOP Secure it with pins and wear it on your head until it has dried from the water you sprinkled before the pooni. After it has completely dried (give it around 3-4 hours just to make sure) you take it off your head DO NOT UNWRAP IT TAKE IT OFF IN IT'S SHAPE and the next time you need to wear you can just place it on your head over your flattened joora instead of tying this. You can do this for around 5 months after you first tied it until you have to ever tie it again.
    • I tie a Punjabi style dastar with starch. Why do people hate this so much? Once when I was tying my dastar my neck seized up and the apna doctor said staying in that position daily for more than 5 mins is dangerous. He recommended a starched pagg like his dad. And I respect my pagg more than my life. I put it on the top shelf of my cupboard whenever it isn't on my head, recite Waheguruji da naam whenever I am tying my joora, fifty and when i place the Dastar on my head and I mata thek and kiss  it before I do. And when I do tie it (every 4 months when the starch starts to weaken) I make sure that I pooni and tie it with much love and whilst reciting paath. I get that if someone treats their turban like a hat (eg: throwing it on the floor, cramping it or just disrespecting it) then this is unacceptable but just cos one puts their pagg on their head rather than tying it each time doesn't mean they treat it as such. (and let's be honest, starched or not we've all put our dad's pagg on our head like a hat when we were kids as a joke and meant no disrespect. Intention is everything). Ik Singhs who get angry tying their pagg and start doing maa/phen di gaaliyan, and when they take it off they just throw to the side and wait to tie it again next time. (Also, I'm from a Jat Sikh family so pls don't try to make this about "starched paggs are tarkhan/caste based" or anything stupid like that). PS: I do remember that stupidness in the 90s/early 2000s UK when Sikh men used to have a tiny starched paggs and were completely clean shaven or had a little goatee like Herbie Sahara/ Vijay from achanak. Now THAT was stupid and deserves all the hate but I just mean the concept of a starched dastar whether it's Punjabi Style, Kenyan style or whatever
    • Anyone know how to tie this turban? My Nani's dad tied it, it was starched but i can't work out whether the pooni was kenyan orpunjabi (like folded or an actual pooni). This was very common before partition, and uses a single dastar (not double stitched). Is it js Kenyan pagg with a higher larr?
    • It doesn't matter. What the nihangs did 100 years ago has no relevance today. Because people fight differently now. As a karate black belt, 90% of what we learn is useless, cos it revolves around how people fought 100 years ago. Today, most teenage boys likely to cause fights (at least in the uk) do boxing. But when boxing was really popular, people used to throw punches, hence why the "man to man fist fight" image was there. But now that UFC is popular, people do all sorts like grappling, knees and all (even with no training).  And also, I highly doubt anyone ever attacked a nihang Singh unarmed back then, just by seeing their saroop with shastaraan. What they did do, however, was Loh Mushti but that was more of a sport than a combat system. They definitely would have trained in basic fighting like wrestling and strikes but not a system. Because any good fighter knows that trying to find a "code" to fight by is stupid. But in terms of unarmed fighting, it was rare and probably revolved around disarming an armed attacker (do NOT even attemp to learn that, you will get killed and there's no point even trying to learn).   If you're interested for historical/ preservation purposed then great, but if you want to learn it for self defense or fighting tactics then pls don't, because what worked then won't work now and Nihangs were probably quite limited in hand to hand combat training cos they're armed to the teeth, deterring any unarmed attacker and killing one if they tried to fight
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use